8000 Implement Naming Rule to Check if Classes Implementing a Specific Int… by mnhock · Pull Request #136 · enofex/taikai · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Implement Naming Rule to Check if Classes Implementing a Specific Int… #136

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 12, 2025
Merged

Implement Naming Rule to Check if Classes Implementing a Specific Int… #136

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 12, 2025

Conversation

mnhock
Copy link
Member
@mnhock mnhock commented Jan 12, 2025

…erface Match Naming Convention

Closes gh-131

@mnhock
Implement Naming Rule to Check if Classes Implementing a Specific Int…
0967d0b 
…erface Match Naming Convention

Closes gh-131
@mnhock mnhock added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 12, 2025
@mnhock mnhock added this to the 1.7.0 milestone Jan 12, 2025
@mnhock mnhock self-assigned this Jan 12, 2025
@mnhock mnhock merged commit e7f9bc1 into main Jan 12, 2025
2 checks passed
@mnhock mnhock deleted the 131-implement-naming-rule-to-check-if-classes-implementing-a-specific-interface-match-naming-convention branch January 12, 2025 18:59
@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@mnhock mnhock

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.7.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@mnhock
0