8000 Add TLS support to Java reactor by MattVonVielen · Pull Request #471 · eventmachine/eventmachine · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Add TLS support to Java reactor #471

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 27 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Ma
8000
ttVonVielen
Copy link

This branch adds SSL/TLS support to the Java reactor. All ssl-related tests pass against JRuby (though there are still many unrelated test failures on JRuby which exist on master).

Addresses issues #34, #180, #379, and one line-item of #117

@swistaczek
Copy link

👍

@gregors
Copy link
gregors commented Jan 23, 2014

I'd love to see feedback on this. I'm assuming that failing test needs fixing before any discussion takes place?

@kennym
Copy link
kennym commented Feb 25, 2014

@gregors if you look at the details of the CI build you'll see that it rather timed out... Travis CI configuration needs to be fixed.

@ibc
Copy link
Contributor
ibc commented Feb 26, 2014

It is sad that pull requests like this one will be just ignored by EM developers.

@kennym
Copy link
kennym commented Feb 26, 2014

@ibc your effort with this fork https://github.com/ibc/EventMachine-LE is admirable. Kudos

@ps2
Copy link
Contributor
ps2 commented May 1, 2014

Anyone know why this isn't merged yet? I could take a swing at resolving any remaining issues if I knew what they were.

@kennym
Copy link
kennym commented May 1, 2014

EventMachine maintai 8000 ners do not accept any pull requests anymore. You will
have better luck with an actively maintained fork.

On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Pete Schwamb notifications@github.comwrote:

Anyone know why this isn't merged yet? I could take a swing at resolving
any remaining issues if I knew what they were.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/471#issuecomment-41943064
.

@portertech
Copy link
Contributor

Considering giving this a go. Could even live w/ a fork w/ "experimental" JRuby support.

@sodabrew sodabrew added this to the v1.2.0 milestone Feb 2, 2015
@sodabrew
Copy link
Member
sodabrew commented Feb 2, 2015

@xenolinguist Could I ask you to rebase this against current master?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants
0