8000 Fixed tags on tests. by AlexSkrypnyk · Pull Request #385 · drevops/behat-steps · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Fixed tags on tests. #385

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2025
Merged

Fixed tags on tests. #385

merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2025

Conversation

AlexSkrypnyk
Copy link
Member
@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk commented May 4, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Updated Behat test files to move or adjust the @api tag from feature-level to specific scenarios, and aligned tag ordering for consistency. No changes were made to test steps or logic.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
coderabbitai bot commented May 4, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This update standardizes the use and placement of the @api tag within several Behat feature files. The @api tag is moved from the feature declaration to individual scenarios in multiple files, and in some cases, it is added alongside existing trait tags. In the user feature file, the order of the @api and @trait:UserTrait tags is swapped for consistency. No changes are made to the actual test logic, steps, or exported entities; all modifications pertain solely to scenario metadata.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
tests/behat/features/draggableviews.feature Moved @api tag from feature to scenario level for "Assert save order of the Draggable Order items."
tests/behat/features/paragraphs.feature Moved @api tag from feature to scenario level; added @api to two scenarios alongside @trait:ParagraphsTrait.
tests/behat/features/path.feature Removed @api tag from feature; added it to five specific scenarios.
tests/behat/features/taxonomy.feature Removed global @api tag; added it to multiple scenarios, sometimes with @trait:TaxonomyTrait.
tests/behat/features/user.feature Swapped order of @api and @trait:UserTrait tags on all affected scenarios.

Poem

In fields of features, tags rearrange,
The @api hops to scenarios—how strange!
Traits and tags now march in line,
Each annotation placed just fine.
No logic changed, just order anew,
A tidy warren for tests to pursue.
🐇✨

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Lite

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 66a8b1d and ff0886f.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • tests/behat/features/draggableviews.feature (1 hunks)
  • tests/behat/features/paragraphs.feature (3 hunks)
  • tests/behat/features/path.feature (2 hunks)
  • tests/behat/features/taxonomy.feature (13 hunks)
  • tests/behat/features/user.feature (22 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
tests/behat/features/draggableviews.feature (1)

6-6: Scenario-level tagging: @api moved to specific scenario
The @api tag is correctly added to the "Assert save order of the Draggable Order items" scenario, replacing the feature-level tag and improving metadata granularity.

tests/behat/features/paragraphs.feature (1)

15-15: Scenario-level tagging: @api added
The @api tag has been correctly applied to the first scenario to replace the feature-level annotation.

tests/behat/features/user.feature (1)

42-42: Scenario-level tagging: @api precedes @trait:UserTrait
The @api tag is now correctly placed before @trait:UserTrait on the non-existing user password failure scenario.

tests/behat/features/taxonomy.feature (1)

13-13: Scenario-level tagging: @api added
The @api tag has been correctly applied to the first vocabulary existence scenario.

tests/behat/features/path.feature (1)

6-6: Scenario-level tagging: @api added
The @api tag has been correctly applied to the first path-check scenario.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov Codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented May 4, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.28%. Comparing base (6852df3) to head (ff0886f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on 3.x.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              3.x     #385   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.28%   81.28%           
=======================================
  Files          32       32           
  Lines 
8E0B
       1881     1881           
=======================================
  Hits         1529     1529           
  Misses        352      352

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk merged commit 0392ac6 into 3.x May 4, 2025
5 checks passed
@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk deleted the feature/fix-tags branch May 4, 2025 09:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@AlexSkrypnyk
0