8000 [#368] Updated BlockContentTrait. by skipper-vp · Pull Request #374 · drevops/behat-steps · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

[#368] Updated BlockContentTrait. #374

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 1, 2025
Merged

[#368] Updated BlockContentTrait. #374

merged 2 commits into from
May 1, 2025

Conversation

skipper-vp
Copy link
Contributor
@skipper-vp skipper-vp commented Apr 30, 2025 •
edited by AlexSkrypnyk
Loading

Closes #368

Updated BlockContentTrait.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated documentation to use "content block" terminology instead of "block content" for improved clarity and consistency.
    • Reorganized and expanded step definitions, removed the ElementTrait section, and updated examples and trait ordering.
  • Tests
    • Replaced the old block content feature tests with new content block feature tests to match the updated terminology and workflows.
  • Refactor
    • Renamed all code references from "BlockContent" to "ContentBlock" for traits, methods, and variables, ensuring consistent naming throughout.
    • Adjusted trait imports and usage order in the test context for consistency.
  • Chores
    • Sorted trait processing order in documentation generation for consistency.

8000 @coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
coderabbitai bot commented Apr 30, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The changes implement a comprehensive renaming of the "BlockContent" terminology to "ContentBlock" across code, documentation, and tests. The trait formerly known as BlockContentTrait is now ContentBlockTrait, with all related methods, properties, and step definitions updated accordingly. Documentation is reorganized and clarified, with deprecated sections removed and new step definitions added. The migration guide is updated to reflect these mapping changes. Feature test files are swapped: the old block content feature is removed, and a new one for content blocks is added. Trait usage in the Behat context is updated, and trait processing in documentation generation is now sorted for consistency.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/ContentBlockTrait.php Renamed trait and all related methods, properties, and documentation from "BlockContent" to "ContentBlock"; updated method and variable names, exception messages, and comments for consistency.
tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php Updated trait import and usage from BlockContentTrait to ContentBlockTrait; reordered trait usages within the class.
MIGRATION.md Added new step definition mappings for ContentBlockTrait; updated regex in JsTrait step definition to make the "I" prefix optional.
steps.md Renamed and reorganized documentation: "BlockContentTrait" → "ContentBlockTrait", updated all related step definitions, removed ElementTrait section, reordered trait sections.
docs.php Added sorting to trait array before processing for consistent documentation ordering.
tests/behat/features/block_content.feature Removed the old Behat feature file for block content functionality.
tests/behat/features/content_block.feature Added a new Behat feature file to test the lifecycle and functionality of content blocks, aligned with the new naming and step definitions.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Admin as Administrator
    participant UI as Content Block Admin UI
    participant System as ContentBlockTrait

    Admin->>UI: Log in and navigate to Content Blocks
    UI->>System: Check if content block type exists
    System-->>UI: Return existence status

    Admin->>UI: Create new content block with fields
    UI->>System: Create content block entity
    System-->>UI: Confirm creation

    Admin->>UI: Edit content block description/body
    UI->>System: Update content block entity
    System-->>UI: Confirm update

    Admin->>UI: Remove content block(s)
    UI->>System: Delete content block entity
    System-->>UI: Confirm removal

    Admin->>UI: Verify content block presence/absence on page
    UI->>System: Query content blocks
    System-->>UI: Return query results
Loading

Poem

In fields anew, the blocks now hop,
Content blocks, not block content, atop!
Traits renamed and docs aligned,
Feature tests with bunnies signed.
Old blocks gone, new ones cheer—
🐇 Code rabbits leap, the path is clear!
Content blocks, we celebrate you here!

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Lite

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8dce949 and e666861.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • MIGRATION.md (2 hunks)
  • docs.php (1 hunks)
  • src/ContentBlockTrait.php (5 hunks)
  • steps.md (5 hunks)
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php (2 hunks)
  • tests/behat/features/block_content.feature (0 hunks)
  • tests/behat/features/content_block.feature (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • tests/behat/features/block_content.feature
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • steps.md
  • MIGRATION.md
🔇 Additional comments (14)
docs.php (1)

63-63: Good improvement for consistent output generation.

Adding sorting to the traits array ensures consistent processing order, which is important for documentation generation. This is particularly valuable as the codebase grows and more traits are added.

tests/behat/features/content_block.feature (3)

1-90: Well-structured test scenarios covering comprehensive functionality.

The feature file provides thorough test coverage for the ContentBlockTrait with multiple scenarios that test creation, editing, verification, placement, and removal of content blocks. The structured approach with clear steps makes the tests easy to understand and maintain.

4-20: Comprehensive initial scenario.

This first scenario effectively tests multiple aspects of content block functionality in a single flow, providing good baseline verification of the trait's capabilities.

78-90: Verify behavior in removal scenario.

The removal scenario appropriately tests both the existence and subsequent non-existence of a content block, but includes a potentially confusing flow. You delete the block and then check that it doesn't exist in the same scenario.

Consider if this scenario would be clearer by either:

  1. First verifying the block exists, then removing it using a specific step definition that performs the removal action, or
  2. Clarifying in comments that the trait's "do not exist" step handles removal of matching blocks
src/ContentBlockTrait.php (10)

13-19: Consistent terminology update in trait documentation.

The documentation has been properly updated to reflect the new "content block" terminology, maintaining clarity in the trait's purpose description.

26-26: Property renamed to match new terminology.

The static property has been correctly renamed from $blockContentEntities to $contentBlockEntities to match the new terminology.

33-34: Tag name updated in documentation.

The @behat-steps-skip tag has been properly updated to reference the renamed method.

38-49: Cleanup method renamed appropriately.

The after scenario method has been renamed from blockContentAfterScenario to contentBlockAfterScenario while maintaining the same cleanup functionality.

55-66: Step definition annotation updated correctly.

Both the method name and step annotation have been updated to use the new terminology while maintaining the same functionality.

85-97: Content block deletion implementation is consistent.

The method has been renamed while maintaining the same deletion logic and error handling.

112-126: Edit method updated with proper naming.

The method for editing content blocks has been renamed appropriately, including updating the internal call to the renamed contentBlockLoadMultiple method.

157-161: Creation method follows new naming convention.

The creation method and its internal helper method call have been consistently renamed to follow the new terminology.

186-199: Internal helper method renamed with consistent implementation.

The helper method for creating a single content block entity has been properly renamed while maintaining the same logic for entity creation and storage.

201-224: Load multiple method implementation matches original logic.

The implementation of the renamed contentBlockLoadMultiple method properly maintains the same query logic and return type as the original method.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov Codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Apr 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.54%. Comparing base (11f906a) to head (8dce949).

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              3.x     #374   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.54%   81.54%           
=======================================
  Files          31       31           
  Lines        1680     1680           
=======================================
  Hits         1370     1370           
  Misses        310      310

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@skipper-vp skipper-vp requested a review from AlexSkrypnyk April 30, 2025 10:53
@skipper-vp
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AlexSkrypnyk Please check that the wording is correct.

@AlexSkrypnyk
Copy link
Member

@coderabbitai full review

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
coderabbitai bot commented Apr 30, 2025
✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk enabled auto-merge (squash) May 1, 2025 02:16
@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk merged commit 80a4dd1 into 3.x May 1, 2025
2 checks passed
@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk deleted the feature/368-update-BlockContentTrait branch May 1, 2025 02:20
This was referenced May 2, 2025
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk AlexSkrypnyk approved these changes

Assignees

@skipper-vp skipper-vp

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@skipper-vp @AlexSkrypnyk
0