Added CheckboxTrait. #400
Added CheckboxTrait. #400
Conversation
|
""" WalkthroughCheckbox interaction support was added to the FieldTrait, including new Behat step definitions and implementation for checking and unchecking checkboxes by selector or label. Documentation and example usage were updated, and a new scenario was added to the field.feature file to test these steps. Minor HTML and import statement adjustments were also made. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Tester as Behat Tester
participant FieldTrait as FieldTrait
participant Page as Mink Page
Tester->>FieldTrait: When I check the checkbox "Label"
FieldTrait->>FieldTrait: fieldFixStepArgument("Label")
FieldTrait->>Page: checkField("Label")
Page-->>FieldTrait: Checkbox checked
Tester->>FieldTrait: When I uncheck the checkbox "Label"
FieldTrait->>FieldTrait: fieldFixStepArgument("Label")
FieldTrait->>Page: uncheckField("Label")
Page-->>FieldTrait: Checkbox unchecked
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
README.md(4 hunks)STEPS.md(2 hunks)src/CheckboxTrait.php(1 hunks)tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php(2 hunks)tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature(1 hunks)tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md
98-98: Inline HTML
Element: details
(MD033, no-inline-html)
STEPS.md
49-49: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol
null
(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)
50-50: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
50-50: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol
null
(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)
50-50: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
51-51: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
51-51: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol
null
(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)
53-53: Multiple consecutive blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 2
(MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
54-54: Inline HTML
Element: details
(MD033, no-inline-html)
55-55: Inline HTML
Element: summary
(MD033, no-inline-html)
55-55: Inline HTML
Element: code
(MD033, no-inline-html)
57-57: Inline HTML
Element: br
(MD033, no-inline-html)
59-59: Inline HTML
Element: br
(MD033, no-inline-html)
59-59: Inline HTML
Element: br
(MD033, no-inline-html)
68-68: Inline HTML
Element: details
(MD033, no-inline-html)
69-69: Inline HTML
Element: summary
(MD033, no-inline-html)
69-69: Inline HTML
Element: code
(MD033, no-inline-html)
71-71: Inline HTML
Element: br
(MD033, no-inline-html)
73-73: Inline HTML
Element: br
(MD033, no-inline-html)
73-73: Inline HTML
Element:
8000
br
(MD033, no-inline-html)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php (2)
12-12: LGTM - New trait import is properly added.The import statement for the new CheckboxTrait is correctly added and follows the alphabetical ordering of imports.
48-48: LGTM - Trait use statement added correctly.The CheckboxTrait is properly integrated into the FeatureContext class.
README.md (1)
46-46: LGTM - Documentation properly updated.The CheckboxTrait is correctly added to the "Index of Generic steps" table with an appropriate description. The entry maintains the table's alphabetical order and formatting.
tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature (1)
1-48: LGTM - Well-structured test coverage for the new CheckboxTrait.The feature file provides excellent test coverage for the new CheckboxTrait:
- Tests both checking and unchecking actions
- Verifies idempotent behavior (ensuring an already checked box is checked doesn't change state)
- Includes negative test cases (marked as skipped) to verify proper error handling
The scenarios are clear, well-organized, and adequately test the functionality.
STEPS.md (4)
7-7: Good index addition consistent with other traits!The CheckboxTrait is properly added to the index table with a clear and concise description matching the style of other traits.
45-52: Well structured trait documentation with clear purposeThe documentation header for the CheckboxTrait follows the established format with source link, example reference, and a clear description of the trait's purpose and benefits.
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
49-49: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol
null(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)
50-50: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1(MD007, ul-indent)
50-50: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol
null(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)
50-50: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
51-51: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1(MD007, ul-indent)
51-51: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol
null(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)
54-66: First step definition is well documentedThe documentation for the "ensure the box is checked" step provides clear usage instructions with a good example that follows the pattern of other traits in this file.
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
54-54: Inline HTML
Element: details(MD033, no-inline-html)
55-55: Inline HTML
Element: summary(MD033, no-inline-html)
55-55: Inline HTML
Element: code(MD033, no-inline-html)
57-57: Inline HTML
Element: br(MD033, no-inline-html)
59-59: Inline HTML
Element: br(MD033, no-inline-html)
59-59: Inline HTML
Element: br(MD033, no-inline-html)
68-80: Second step definition is well documentedThe documentation for the "ensure the box is unchecked" step provides clear usage instructions with a good example that follows the pattern of other traits in this file.
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
68-68: Inline HTML
Element: details(MD033, no-inline-html)
69-69: Inline HTML
Element: summary(MD033, no-inline-html)
69-69: Inline HTML
Element: code(MD033, no-inline-html)
71-71: Inline HTML
Element: br(MD033, no-inline-html)
73-73: Inline HTML
Element: br(MD033, no-inline-html)
73-73: Inline HTML
Element: br(MD033, no-inline-html)
src/CheckboxTrait.php (5)
1-12: Proper structure and documentationThe trait follows best practices with appropriate declarations:
- Strict types enabled
- Proper namespace
- Comprehensive class-level documentation that explains the trait's purpose
The code adheres to the project's coding standards.
13-27: Well documented method with clear Behat annotationThe first method has excellent documentation:
- Clear description of what the method does
- Explanation of when to use it
- Code example with proper formatting
- Behat annotation for step definition
28-39: First method implementation is clean and handles errors properlyThe implementation:
- Finds the checkbox by label
- Includes proper error handling when the checkbox isn't found
- Efficiently only checks the checkbox if it's not already checked
This is a good implementation of conditional checkbox toggling.
41-53: Well documented second methodSimilar to the first method, this has excellent documentation that clearly explains the purpose and usage.
54-65: Second method implementation is clean and handles errors properlyThe implementation follows the same pattern as the first method with appropriate error handling and conditional logic.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #400 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.29% 80.35% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 29 30 +1
Lines 1959 1970 +11
==========================================
+ Hits 1573 1583 +10
- Misses 386 387 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
31a73dc to
b01615b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
README.md (1)
98-214: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Optional: Consider relocating the AI migration prompt.
This<details>block adds extensive AI-driven migration instructions that may clutter the primary README. Consider moving it toMIGRATION.mdor another dedicated document and linking to it for cleaner top-level documentation.
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/CheckboxTrait.php (1)
29-36: Good implementation of the helper method to reduce duplication.The
findCheckboxByLabelhelper method effectively addresses the previous review comment about code duplication. This improves maintainability by centralizing the checkbox lookup logic.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Lite
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
README.md(4 hunks)STEPS.md(2 hunks)src/CheckboxTrait.php(1 hunks)tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php(2 hunks)tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature(1 hunks)tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html (1)
382-383: Fixture update is correct.
The new checkbox markup has matchingnameandidand a corresponding<label>for accessibility.tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php (2)
10-13: Correct import ofCheckboxTrait.
The trait is imported and placed in alphabetical order with other traits.
45-49: Correct use ofCheckboxTraitin the class.
The trait is added and alphabetically sorted among the other trait inclusions.README.md (1)
46-46: AddedCheckboxTraitto the steps index.
The new entry correctly links toSTEPS.md#checkboxtraitand follows the table format.STEPS.md (1)
7-7: AddedCheckboxTraitto the generic steps index.
The new table entry correctly follows the existing format and links to the checkbox documentation anchor.tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature (4)
1-5: Feature description is clear.
The feature summary and intent are well-defined.
21-34: Negative scenario for checking a non-existent checkbox is appropriate.
The skipped scenario correctly tests the failure message when the checkbox label is not found.
35-48: Negative scenario for unchecking a non-existent checkbox is appropriate.
The skipped scenario correctly tests the failure message when the checkbox label is not found.
6-20:❓ Verification inconclusive
Inconsistent tagging and verify assertion step definitions.
The positive scenario uses@checkboxtraitinstead of the@trait:CheckboxTraitconvention used in the negative scenarios—consider unifying tags for consistency. Also ensure that the assertion stepsThen the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should not be checkedare implemented in the trait.
Run the following script to verify the assertion step definitions exist in
src/CheckboxTrait.php:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that assertion steps for checkbox state exist in the trait implementation. rg -n "@Then.*checkbox" src/CheckboxTrait.phpLength of output: 47
#!/bin/bash # Locate CheckboxTrait.php and verify assertion step annotations echo "Locating CheckboxTrait.php..." find . -type f -iname 'CheckboxTrait.php' | while read -r file; do echo "→ Found: $file" echo "Checking for @Then annotations in $file..." rg -n '@Then' "$file" || echo "✗ No @Then annotations found in $file" done
#!/bin/bash # Locate the CheckboxTrait file file=$(find . -type f -iname 'CheckboxTrait.php' | head -n1) if [ -z "$file" ]; then echo "✗ CheckboxTrait.php not found" else echo "→ Found $file" echo "Searching for @Then annotations in $file" rg -n "@Then" "$file" || echo "✗ No @Then annotations found in $file" fi
Unify tagging and verify checkbox assertion steps
Please update the feature and ensure your trait implements the necessary step definitions:
- In tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature, replace every
@checkboxtraittag with@trait:CheckboxTraitfor consistency.- Confirm that your
CheckboxTrait.php(e.g. in src/ or features/bootstrap/) defines these steps, for example:
@Then /^the "(.*)" checkbox should be checked$/@Then /^the "(.*)" checkbox should not be checked$/If those methods or annotations are missing, please add them to the trait so the assertions will work.
src/CheckboxTrait.php (1)
1-80: Well-implemented trait with clean, reusable code.This trait is well-structured with proper documentation, good error handling, and follows best practices. I especially like the conditional logic that only toggles checkbox state when necessary, improving test efficiency.
src/CheckboxTrait.php
Outdated
| if (!$checkbox) { | ||
| throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label)); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider enhancing error message with more context.
While the error message is clear, it could be more helpful for debugging by including the current page URL or title.
if (!$checkbox) {
- throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label));
+ throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page "%s".', $label, $this->getSession()->getCurrentUrl()));
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (!$checkbox) { | |
| throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label)); | |
| } | |
| if (!$checkbox) { | |
| throw new \Exception(sprintf( | |
| 'The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page "%s".', | |
| $label, | |
| $this->getSession()->getCurrentUrl() | |
| )); | |
| } |
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
README.md (1)
98-216: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider relocating the AI migration prompt
The large<details>block for the AI-guided migration prompt may clutter the main README. You could move it to a dedicated MIGRATION.md or append it to CONTRIBUTING.md for better separation of concerns.
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
STEPS.md (1)
45-52: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Standardize bullet phrasing for consistency
The bullets under theCheckboxTraitsection mix imperative (Ensure) and descriptive (Provides). Consider using parallel phrasing, e.g.:- > - Provides intuitive steps for conditional checkbox manipulation. + > - Provide intuitive steps for conditional checkbox manipulation.tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature (1)
35-48: Duplicate of previous tagging suggestion
Please see the comment on lines 21–34 regarding consistent tag usage between positive and negative scenarios.src/CheckboxTrait.php (1)
32-34: Consider enhancing error message with more context.While the error message is clear, it could be more helpful for debugging by including the current page URL or title.
if (!$checkbox) { - throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label)); + throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page "%s".', $label, $this->getSession()->getCurrentUrl())); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Lite
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
README.md(4 hunks)STEPS.md(2 hunks)src/CheckboxTrait.php(1 hunks)tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php(2 hunks)tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature(1 hunks)tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html (1)
382-383: Fixture updated correctly
The new checkbox input and its<label>are properly added within the container, with matchingidandnameattributes and a correctforreference.tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php (2)
12-12: Import ofCheckboxTraitis correct
The newuse DrevOps\BehatSteps\CheckboxTrait;import aligns with the namespace conventions of other traits.
48-48: Trait inclusion in context class is correct
UsingCheckboxTraitwithinFeatureContextenables the new step definitions as expected.README.md (1)
46-46: DocumentedCheckboxTraitin index
The README now listsCheckboxTraitwith a description and correct link toSTEPS.md.STEPS.md (1)
7-7: Added index entry forCheckboxTrait
The generic steps index now correctly references the newCheckboxTrait.tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature (1)
1-20: Main scenario covers state toggling thoroughly
The “Assert ensure checkbox is checked/unchecked” scenario exercises both initial and idempotent state changes. Gherkin syntax and tags align with conventions.src/CheckboxTrait.php (4)
29-36: Great job extracting the common checkbox lookup into a helper method!The helper method effectively reduces duplication between the two public methods and follows good software engineering practices. The method signature, documentation, and implementation are clear and appropriate.
38-57: Well-documented method with clear purpose and example usageThe
checkboxEnsureIsCheckedmethod has comprehensive documentation that clearly explains its purpose, when to use it, and includes a practical usage example. The implementation correctly only checks the box if it's not already checked, preventing unnecessary actions.
59-78: Well-documented method with clear purpose and example usageThe
checkboxEnsureIsUncheckedmethod is similarly well-documented with a clear explanation and example. The implementation correctly only unchecks the box if it's already checked, preventing unnecessary actions.
1-80: Overall excellent implementation of the CheckboxTraitThe trait is well-structured, follows PHP best practices, and provides useful functionality for Behat tests. The code is clean, well-documented, and the methods have a single, clear responsibility. The trait will be valuable for creating more readable and maintainable Behat step definitions.
| @trait:CheckboxTrait @skipped | ||
| Scenario: Negative assertion for "Given I ensure the box :label is checked" fails as expected when the checkbox does not exist | ||
| Given some behat configuration | ||
| And scenario steps tagged with "@api @javascript @phpserver": | ||
| """ | ||
| Given I am on the phpserver test page | ||
| When I ensure the box "Non-existent checkbox" is checked | ||
| """ | ||
| When I run "behat --no-colors" | ||
| Then it should fail with an error: | ||
| """ | ||
| The checkbox with label "Non-existent checkbox" was not found on the page. | ||
| """ | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Use consistent scenario tagging
Negative scenarios use @trait:CheckboxTrait, while the positive scenario is tagged @checkboxtrait. For filtering or test runs by tag, consider unifying on one convention (e.g., always use @checkboxtrait).
b01615b to
d73a1b0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
README.md (1)
98-215: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Reevaluate large AI migration prompt block
This extensive<details>section may overwhelm the README. Consider moving the AI migration prompt to a dedicatedMIGRATION.mdor external guide to keep the primary README concise, linking to full instructions instead.
♻️ Duplicate comments (4)
STEPS.md (1)
45-52: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Align bullet tense for uniformity
The second bullet uses “Provides intuitive steps…”, while other trait docs use imperative verbs. Consider changing it to “Provide intuitive steps…” for consistency.tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature (2)
35-48: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Use consistent scenario tagging
Apply the same tag consistency to this second negative scenario. Consider unifying tags to match the positive and first negative scenarios.
21-34: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Use consistent scenario tagging
This negative scenario uses@trait:CheckboxTrait, but the positive scenario does not. Consider adopting a uniform tag convention (e.g., always@checkboxtrait) across all related scenarios.src/CheckboxTrait.php (1)
32-34: Consider enhancing error message with more context.While the error message is clear, it could be more helpful for debugging by including the current page URL or title.
if (!$checkbox) { - throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label)); + throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page "%s".', $label, $this->getSession()->getCurrentUrl())); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Lite
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
README.md(4 hunks)STEPS.md(2 hunks)src/CheckboxTrait.php(1 hunks)tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php(2 hunks)tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature(1 hunks)tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html (1)
382-383: Approve fixture addition for checkbox
The new checkbox input and its corresponding label are correctly added with matchingnameandidattributes, enabling theCheckboxTraittests to locate the element.tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php (2)
12-12: Integrate CheckboxTrait import
Correctly imports the genericCheckboxTraitalongside other traits.
48-48: Include CheckboxTrait in FeatureContext
The trait is properly applied to enable the new checkbox step definitions.README.md (1)
46-46: Document CheckboxTrait in README index
The entr 8000 y forCheckboxTraitis clear and aligns with other generic traits.STEPS.md (1)
7-7: Add CheckboxTrait to generic steps index
The index entry correctly links to the new trait documentation.src/CheckboxTrait.php (3)
1-80: Overall well-organized and functional trait for checkbox handlingThis new trait is well-structured with clear documentation and a good separation of concerns. I appreciate the conditional toggle that only changes state when needed and the extracted helper method that reduces duplication.
38-57: Excellent conditional checkbox handling implementationThe method correctly ensures a checkbox is checked without changing its state if it's already checked. The documentation is clear with a good example and the Gherkin annotation is properly formatted.
59-78: Well-implemented checkbox unchecking functionalityThis method mirrors the checking method with consistent documentation style and implementation. Good job ensuring symmetry between the two methods.
| Feature: Check that CheckboxTrait works | ||
| As Behat Steps library developer | ||
| I want to provide tools to handle checkbox form elements | ||
| So that users can efficiently manage checkbox state in their tests | ||
|
|
||
| @javascript @phpserver | ||
| Scenario: Assert ensure checkbox is checked/unchecked functionality | ||
| Given I am on the phpserver test page | ||
| When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is checked | ||
| Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked | ||
| When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is unchecked | ||
| Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should not be checked | ||
| # Test that it works when checkbox is already in desired state | ||
| When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is unchecked | ||
| Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should not be checked | ||
| When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is checked | ||
| Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked | ||
| When I ensure the box "Test checkbox" is checked | ||
| Then the "Test checkbox" checkbox should be checked | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Refine scenario name and tagging
The scenario title “Assert ensure checkbox is checked/unchecked functionality” is redundant. Consider renaming to “Ensure checkbox can be checked and unchecked”. Also, tag this scenario with @trait:CheckboxTrait or @checkboxtrait to align with the negative scenarios for consistent filtering.
src/CheckboxTrait.php
Outdated
| * @param string $label | ||
| * The checkbox label. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Remove trailing period for consistency in docblock
The parameter docblock ends with a period while other docblocks in this file don't have trailing periods. Consider removing it for consistency.
* @param string $label
- * The checkbox label.
+ * The checkbox label📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| * @param string $label | |
| * The checkbox label. | |
| * @param string $label | |
| * The checkbox label |
d73a1b0 to
3db943f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature (1)
52-79: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Refine negative scenario names and setup
The two negative scenarios are very verbose and use a placeholder step (Given some behat configuration). Consider:
- Shortening the scenario titles to something like
Fail when ensuring non-existent checkbox is checkedandFail when ensuring non-existent checkbox is unchecked.- Replacing the generic
Given some behat configurationwith the actual initial context steps (e.g.,Given I am on the phpserver test page) to make the scenario self-contained.
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
STEPS.md (1)
45-52: Align bullet tense for consistency
In theCheckboxTraitsection, the bullets use mixed imperative and descriptive forms:- > - Provides intuitive steps for conditional checkbox manipulation. + > - Provide intuitive steps for conditional checkbox manipulation.Updating this will match the imperative style used elsewhere.
src/CheckboxTrait.php (2)
17-28: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Remove trailing period for consistency in docblock
The parameter docblock ends with a period while other docblocks in this file don't have trailing periods. Consider removing it for consistency.
* @param string $label - * The checkbox label. + * The checkbox label
29-36: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider enhancing error message with more context.
While the error message is clear, it could be more helpful for debugging by including the current page URL or title.
if (!$checkbox) { - throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page.', $label)); + throw new \Exception(sprintf('The checkbox with label "%s" was not found on the page "%s".', $label, $this->getSession()->getCurrentUrl())); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Lite
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
README.md(4 hunks)STEPS.md(2 hunks)src/CheckboxTrait.php(1 hunks)tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php(2 hunks)tests/behat/features/checkbox.feature(1 hunks)tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html(1 hunks)
9E88
🔇 Additional comments (9)
tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html (1)
382-383: Fixture update – checkbox input added
The new<input type="checkbox">and corresponding<label>are correctly inserted with matchingidandforattributes, ensuring accessibility and aligning with the trait’s test scenarios.tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php (2)
12-12: ImportCheckboxTraitin the proper namespace
The importuse DrevOps\BehatSteps\CheckboxTrait;correctly matches the trait’s location insrc/.
48-48: EnableCheckboxTraitinFeatureContext
Addinguse CheckboxTrait;integrates the new steps into the Behat context, allowing the trait’s methods to be available.README.md (1)
46-46: Document newCheckboxTraitindex entry
The README now listsCheckboxTraitin the generic steps table with a clear description.STEPS.md (1)
7-7: Index entry forCheckboxTrait
The generic steps index now correctly references the new trait.src/CheckboxTrait.php (4)
1-15: Well-structured trait declaration and documentation.The trait is properly declared with namespace, imports, and comprehensive PHPDoc that clearly explains its purpose and functionality.
38-57: Well-implemented checkbox checking functionality with clear documentation.The method is well documented with helpful examples and properly implements the logic to only check the box if it's currently unchecked. Good use of the extracted helper method.
59-79: Well-implemented checkbox unchecking functionality with clear documentation.The method is well documented with helpful examples and properly implements the logic to only uncheck the box if it's currently checked. Good use of the extracted helper method.
80-81: The trait implementation is complete and well-structured.The trait provides a cohesive set of methods for checkbox interaction in Behat tests, following good practices for code organization and documentation.
README.md
Outdated
| @@ -94,7 +95,7 @@ composer require --dev drevops/behat-steps:^3 | |||
| > and clarity. Please refer to the [migration map](MIGRATION.md) to see the | |||
| > changes. An automated migration script is not included, but an AI-guided migration prompt is provided below. | |||
|
|
|||
| <details> | |||
| <details> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider relocating the AI migration details
The inserted <details> block containing the AI-guided migration prompt is comprehensive but may bloat the main README. Consider moving it to MIGRATION.md or a separate guide to keep the primary README focused.
3db943f to
8214639
Compare
|
@CodeRabbit full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Lite
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
STEPS.md(1 hunks)src/FieldTrait.php(1 hunks)tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php(1 hunks)tests/behat/features/field.feature(1 hunks)tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
tests/behat/fixtures/relative.html (2)
342-342: Expanded hex color code for consistency.The CSS background color for the
#logelement was changed from shorthand#cccto the full hexadecimal#cccccc, providing more consistent formatting across the codebase.
380-387: Added checkbox inputs and labels for testing the new checkbox trait functionality.A form element with text inputs and labeled checkboxes was added to support the new checkbox-related Behat steps. One checkbox is initially unchecked and one is checked, providing test cases for both states.
STEPS.md (1)
514-542: Well-documented checkbox interaction steps.The new step definitions for checking and unchecking checkboxes are clearly documented with proper formatting and examples. These steps align with the newly implemented checkbox functionality in the FieldTrait.
tests/behat/bootstrap/FeatureContext.php (1)
10-12: Reorganized trait imports for better structure.The import statements were reorganized to group related traits together.
CookieTraitandDateTraitimports were moved earlier, while several other traits were moved afterWatchdogTrait. This improves code organization while maintaining all necessary functionality.Also applies to: 30-37
tests/behat/features/field.feature (1)
323-336: Added comprehensive test scenario for checkbox functionality.A new scenario was added to test the checkbox interaction functionality, verifying:
- Existence of checkboxes
- Initial checked/unchecked state verification
- Checking a checkbox and confirming the state change
- Re-checking an already checked checkbox to ensure idempotent behavior
This provides good test coverage for the new checkbox-related steps.
src/FieldTrait.php (1)
313-349: Note about PR title vs. implementationThe PR is titled "Added CheckboxTrait" but the functionality has been added to the existing
FieldTraitinstead. This seems appropriate since the methods are related to field manipulation, but you might want to update the PR title to reflect the actual changes.
Added CheckboxTrait.
Summary by CodeRabbit