8000 docs: add comprehensive integration documentation for various services by lorenzejay · Pull Request #2999 · crewAIInc/crewAI · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

docs: add comprehensive integration documentation for various services #2999

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

docs: add comprehensive integration documentation for various services #2999

wants to merge 3 commits into from
+6,116 −0

Conversation

lorenzejay
Copy link
Collaborator
  • Introduced detailed documentation for integrations including Asana, Box, ClickUp, GitHub, Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Sheets, HubSpot, Jira, Linear, Notion, Salesforce, Shopify, Slack, Stripe, and Zendesk.
  • Updated main docs.json to include a new "Integration Docs" section, organizing the documentation for easy access.
  • Each integration includes setup instructions, available actions, and example tasks to streamline user onboarding and usage.
Screenshot 2025-06-11 at 3 09 24 PM

@lorenzejay
docs: add comprehensive integration documentation for various services
7d7afb9 
- Introduced detailed documentation for integrations including Asana, Box, ClickUp, GitHub, Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Sheets, HubSpot, Jira, Linear, Notion, Salesforce, Shopify, Slack, Stripe, and Zendesk.
- Updated main docs.json to include a new "Integration Docs" section, organizing the documentation for easy access.
- Each integration includes setup instructions, available actions, and example tasks to streamline user onboarding and usage.
@joaomdmoura
Copy link
Collaborator

Disclaimer: This review was made by a crew of AI Agents.

Code Review Comment

Overview

This pull request introduces comprehensive integration documentation for 16 services, significantly enhancing our documentation’s clarity and utility. However, several areas must be addressed to ensure consistency and completeness.

Strengths

  1. Consistent Layout: The uniform structure across all integration documents greatly aids readability and usability.
  2. Clear Prerequisites: Each integration clearly outlines necessary setups, which is crucial for user readiness.
  3. AccordionGroup Components: Well-organized references improve navigation within the documentation.
  4. Practical Examples: The use of real code snippets allows users to connect theory with practical application effectively.

Areas for Improvement

  1. Standardize Parameter Documentation: The parameter documentation format is inconsistent, particularly evident in gmail.mdx. Implement the following standard format throughout all documents:

    **Parameters:**
- `parameter` (type, required/optional): Description
  - Default: [if applicable]
  - Example: "example value"
  - Options: [if applicable]

  2. Error Handling Documentation: Introducing a standardized section for error handling will significantly improve user experience. Suggested template:

    ## Error Handling

### Common Errors
- `ERROR_CODE`: Description and resolution steps
- `AUTHENTICATION_ERROR`: How to resolve authentication issues
- `RATE_LIMIT_ERROR`: Rate limiting considerations and handling

### Best Practices
- Include try-catch blocks in code examples
- Implement proper error logging
- Handle rate limiting gracefully

  3. Code Example Consistency: To further enhance clarity, standardize the structure of code examples across documents. Proposed format:

    # 1. Import statements
from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew
from crewai_tools import CrewaiEnterpriseTools

# 2. Configuration
enterprise_tools = CrewaiEnterpriseTools(
    enterprise_token="your_enterprise_token",
    actions_list=["specific_actions"] # Optional: filtered actions
)

  4. Version Compatibility Matrix: Including a matrix for version compatibility will help users manage expectations regarding functionality. Format it as follows:

    ## Version Compatibility
| CrewAI Version | Integration Version | Notes |
|----------------|---------------------|-------|
| 1.x            | 2.x                 | Full support |
| 0.9.x          | 1.x                 | Limited features |

  5. Rate Limiting Information: This is critical information that should clearly state limits associated with different user tiers. It aids in preventing unexpected service interruptions. Basic structure:

    ## Rate Limiting
- **Basic tier**: 100 requests/minute
- **Enterprise tier**: 1000 requests/minute

### Handling Rate Limits
```python
from time import sleep
def handle_rate_limit(func):
    ...

  6. Security Best Practices: Enhancing the documentation with security guidelines will help users safeguard sensitive information effectively. Suggested format:

    ## Security Best Practices

### Token Management
- Store enterprise_token in environment variables

  7. Integration Testing Examples: Providing examples of how to test integrations is imperative for maintaining code quality. Include unit testing frameworks like pytest with mock configurations.

  8. Structured Troubleshooting Guides: Create decision trees for troubleshooting common issues which will significantly enhance user autonomy in solving problems.

Historical Context & Insights

From related PRs (#1001, #1502, #1750), it is clear that a consistent format and good error handling have been ongoing concerns. The lessons learned emphasize the need for maintaining uniformity across documents, which not only boosts usability but also leads to fewer user errors.

Conclusion

The improvements outlined above not only aim at enhancing consistency and clarity across integration documents but will also fundamentally improve the developer experience. Implementing these suggestions systematically across all 16 files will ensure a cohesive, user-friendly documentation set that meets both current and future needs.

@lorenzejay lorenzejay requested a review from tonykipkemboi June 13, 2025 22:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@tonykipkemboi tonykipkemboi Awaiting requested review from tonykipkemboi

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@lorenzejay @joaomdmoura
0