8000 feat: load Tool from Agent repository by their own module by lucasgomide · Pull Request #2940 · crewAIInc/crewAI · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

feat: load Tool from Agent repository by their own module #2940

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 4, 2025

Conversation

lucasgomide
Copy link
Contributor

Previously, we only supported tools from the crewai-tools open-source repository. Now, we're introducing improved support for private tool repositories.

Previously, we only supported tools from the crewai-tools open-source repository. Now, we're introducing improved support for private tool repositories.
@joaomdmoura
Copy link
Collaborator

Disclaimer: This review was made by a crew of AI Agents.

Code Review Comment for PR #2940

Overview

This pull request enhances the system's ability to load tools from various custom repositories, vastly improving utility beyond the previous restriction to crewai-tools. This extension is crucial for expanding the application’s capabilities and promoting broader flexibility.

Code Quality Findings

agent_utils.py Improvements

  1. Error Handling Enhancements

    • The implementation currently raises a generic exception on failure, making it difficult to understand the nature of an error.
    • Improvement Suggestion: Introduce specific exceptions like ImportError and AttributeError to provide clearer logging and handling:
      except ImportError as e:
          logger.error(f"Failed to import module {tool['module']}: {e}")
  2. Input Validation

    • The absence of validation for the tool configuration may lead to runtime errors.
    • Improvement Suggestion: Implement a validate_tool_config function to check for required keys like module and name ensuring configuration integrity before processing.

agent_test.py Improvements

  1. Test Structure Optimization

    • While tests cover successful and error cases adequately, a more organized structure utilizing pytest.mark.parametrize can enhance readability and maintainability.
    @pytest.mark.parametrize("tool_config,expected_tools", [...])
  2. Edge Cases

    • Currently, several edge cases are untested, including handling empty tool inputs and invalid configurations.
    • Improvement Suggestion: Introduce additional tests to cover scenarios such as an empty tool list or a missing configuration key.

Historical Context and Related Findings

Due to access limitations, I could not fetch related pull requests for context. However, I recommend reviewing prior related PRs that interacted with agent_utils.py or similar functionality to glean insights on decisions made concerning structure and error handling. Understanding how previous contributions approached dynamic tool loading can inform best practices.

General Recommendations

  1. Documentation Updates

    • Ensure that the new configuration format is well-documented in both the code and the README for ease of understanding by new contributors.
  2. Type Hints

    • Consider incorporating type hints to improve code clarity and maintainability:
    def load_agent_from_repository(from_repository: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
  3. Constants Usage

    • Define constants for keys used within the tool configuration to avoid hardcoding values throughout the code.
  4. Security Practices

    • Given the dynamic nature of the imports, implementing a module allowlist can help prevent potential security vulnerabilities related to arbitrary code execution.

Conclusion

The proposed changes effectively extend the flexibility of tool loading, but additional work on error handling, input validation, and testing is essential for robustness. By implementing the suggested improvements, we can ensure that the functionality is not only flexible but also resilient and secure against potential issues.

I look forward to seeing the next iteration of this implementation, which aims for high-quality and maintainable code!

@lucasgomide lucasgomide requested a review from lorenzejay June 4, 2025 12:43
@lucasgomide lucasgomide merged commit 552921c into main Jun 4, 2025
10 checks passed
joaomdmoura pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2025
Previously, we only supported tools from the crewai-tools open-source repository. Now, we're introducing improved support for private tool repositories.
didier-durand pushed a commit to didier-durand/crewAI that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
…2940)

Previously, we only supported tools from the crewai-tools open-source repository. Now, we're introducing improved support for private tool repositories.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0