8000 cleaning up some typos in scripts by didier-durand · Pull Request #2860 · crewAIInc/crewAI · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

cleaning up some typos in scripts #2860

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

cleaning up some typos in scripts #2860

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

didier-durand
Copy link

Hi,

As per title, cleaning some typos in Python scripts. See commit diffs for details.

Didier

@joaomdmoura
Copy link
Collaborator

Disclaimer: This review was made by a crew of AI Agents.

Code Review Summary for PR #2860 - Cleaning Up Typos in Scripts

Overview

This pull request successfully addresses various typographical and grammatical issues scattered across five different files in the crewAI codebase. Improving documentation clarity and variable name consistency contributes to better maintainability and usability of the codebase.

File-by-File Insights

1. base_agent_executor_mixin.py

  • Change: Corrected the grammar in the docstring: "a external-term" changed to "an external-term".
  • Impact: This change enhances the documentation's accuracy and readability without affecting functionality.

2. cli.py

  • Change: Fixed the typo in the documentation, correcting "latest_crew_kickoff_ouputs" to "latest_crew_kickoff_outputs".
  • Impact: This fix increases clarity for any future users or maintainers referencing the documentation, ensuring they understand the intended outputs clearly.

3. update_crew.py

  • Changes: Improved variable naming consistency by correcting "addtional_lib_version" to "additional_lib_version" across three occurrences.
  • Impact: Such corrections promote uniformity in the codebase, aiding readability and reducing the potential for confusion.

Suggested Improvement:

To further enhance the parse_version function's clarity and reliability:

def parse_version(version: str) -> str:
    """
    Parse and convert version specifiers.
    
    Args:
        version (str): Version string starting with '^'
    
    Returns:
        str: Formatted version string
    """
    if not isinstance(version, str):
        raise TypeError("Version must be a string")
    if not version:
        raise ValueError("Version cannot be empty")
    # Return formatted version remains unchanged.

4. utils.py

  • Change: Fixed the grammar in the docstring, changing "from the a file" to "from a file".
  • Impact: Improved clarity helps maintain consistency in understanding utility functions.

5. conditional_task.py

  • Change: Corrected the grammar from "since its needs" to "since it needs".
  • Impact: The documentation is now clearer and more professional, enhancing collaboration.

General Recommendations

  1. Docstring Enhancements: It would be beneficial to add comprehensive docstrings for critical functions, including:

    • Describing parameters and return values.
    • Providing example usages where appropriate.

  2. Input Validation: For function robustness, ensure that inputs, such as in parse_version, are validated to prevent errors during runtime.

  3. Enum for Memory Types: In cli.py, using an enum for memory type definitions could prevent future typos, enhancing code safety and readability:

from enum import Enum

class MemoryType(Enum):
    LONG = "long"
    SHORT = "short"
    ENTITIES = "entities"
    KNOWLEDGE = "knowledge"
    AGENT_KNOWLEDGE = "agent_knowledge"
    KICKOFF_OUTPUTS = "kickoff_outputs"

Summary

The pull request primarily consists of grammatical corrections and typographical fixes that significantly improve documentation clarity and variable name consistency. These changes bolster the overall quality and maintainability of the codebase without introducing functional alterations.

Overall Assessment

✅ LGTM (Looks Good To Merge)
The updates align well with the best coding practices and positively influence the documentation's quality within the codebase. Therefore, this PR can be merged confidently.

@didier-durand
Copy link
Author

I updated the branch

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@didier-durand @joaomdmoura @lucasgomide
0