Refactor list components and fix lints #1162
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in Changes
Suggested labels
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🧬 Code Definitions (1)pkg/list/list_components_test.go (2)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pkg/list/list_components.go (1)
62-73: Consider adding error logging in processAllStacks.The function silently skips invalid stacks, which might hide underlying issues. Consider logging these errors or adding a debug option to surface these errors.
func processAllStacks(stacksMap map[string]any) []string { var components []string for stackName, stackData := range stacksMap { stackComponents, err := getStackComponents(stackData) if err != nil { - continue // Skip invalid stacks. + // Log error and continue + fmt.Printf("Warning: Skipping invalid stack %s: %v\n", stackName, err) + continue } components = append(components, stackComponents...) } return components }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pkg/list/list_components.go(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (8)
pkg/list/list_components.go (8)
11-23: Good improvement in error handling with specific error variables.The introduction of these specific error variables makes error handling more robust and explicit throughout the code. Following Go's conventions with "Err" prefix and providing clear documentation for each error type is a solid approach.
28-30: Clean error return using predefined error variable.Using the new predefined error variable improves consistency. Good job simplifying from generic error messages.
33-35: Consistent error handling with predefined variable.Updating to use the predefined error enhances maintainability and consistency with the rest of the code.
38-40: Consistent use of predefined error.Same good improvement as previous error handling changes.
45-60: Well-structured new helper function with appropriate error wrapping.The new helper function
getComponentsForSpecificStackproperly encapsulates the logic for extracting components from a specific stack. Good use of error wrapping to provide context.
80-86: Good delegation to helper function.Extracting the specific stack handling to a dedicated function makes the code more modular and readable.
87-89: Clean delegation to processAllStacks.Using the new helper function makes the code more modular and easier to maintain. The comment is slightly redundant given the function name but doesn't hurt readability.
91-94: Good organization of component post-processing.Marking the section as component post-processing with a comment improves readability. The deduplication and sorting steps are clear.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1162 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 27.72% 27.84% +0.12%
==========================================
Files 182 182
Lines 21132 21145 +13
==========================================
+ Hits 5858 5888 +30
+ Misses 14324 14312 -12
+ Partials 950 945 -5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
…nto feat/refactor-list-components
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pkg/list/list_components.go (1)
64-75: Consider adding error feedback for skipped stacks.The function silently skips invalid stacks without any indication to the caller. Consider adding some form of logging or aggregating errors to inform callers about skipped stacks.
// processAllStacks collects components from all valid stacks. -func processAllStacks(stacksMap map[string]any) []string { +func processAllStacks(stacksMap map[string]any) ([]string, []error) { var components []string + var skippedErrors []error for _, stackData := range stacksMap { stackComponents, err := getStackComponents(stackData) if err != nil { + skippedErrors = append(skippedErrors, err) continue // Skip invalid stacks. } components = append(components, stackComponents...) } - return components + return components, skippedErrors }Then update the caller in FilterAndListComponents:
} else { // Process all stacks. - components = processAllStacks(stacksMap) + components, _ = processAllStacks(stacksMap) + // Optionally log or handle the errors }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pkg/list/list_components.go(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Build (windows-latest, windows)
- GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (4)
pkg/list/list_components.go (4)
11-25: Well-structured error definitions.The error definitions are clean and follow Go best practices with descriptive messages and proper documentation. Grouping them in a var block improves readability.
27-45: Improved error handling with dedicated error variables.The function now returns specific error types instead of generic error messages, making it easier for callers to handle different error cases.
47-62: Good extraction of component retrieval logic.This function effectively encapsulates the logic for stack component retrieval with proper error handling and context. The error wrapping with fmt.Errorf and %w preserves the original error while adding useful context.
77-94: Good refactoring to improve code organization.The updated function properly delegates to helper functions and adds nil checking for stacksMap. This makes the code more modular and prevents potential nil pointer dereferences.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
pkg/list/list_components.go (2)
62-73: Consider logging skipped errorsThe function correctly implements a "best effort" approach by skipping invalid stacks. Consider adding logging when skipping invalid stacks to avoid silently hiding issues that might need attention.
func processAllStacks(stacksMap map[string]any) []string { var components []string for _, stackData := range stacksMap { stackComponents, err := getStackComponents(stackData) if err != nil { + // Consider logging the error here continue // Skip invalid stacks. } components = append(components, stackComponents...) } return components }
78-80: Consider a more specific error for nil stacksMapUsing
ErrStackNotFoundwhenstacksMapis nil is somewhat misleading as no specific stack is being referenced. Consider adding a dedicated error likeErrNilStacksMapfor this specific case.+// ErrNilStacksMap is returned when the stacks map is nil. +var ErrNilStacksMap = errors.New("stacks map is nil") func FilterAndListComponents(stackFlag string, stacksMap map[string]any) ([]string, error) { var components []string if stacksMap == nil { - return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: %s", ErrStackNotFound, stackFlag) + return nil, ErrNilStacksMap }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pkg/list/list_components.go(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: Acceptance Tests (macos-latest, macos)
- GitHub Check: Acceptance Tests (windows-latest, windows)
- GitHub Check: Acceptance Tests (ubuntu-latest, linux)
- GitHub Check: [localstack] demo-localstack
- GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (5)
pkg/list/list_components.go (5)
11-23: Strong error handling approach!The introduction of specific error variables is a solid improvement. It makes error handling clearer and more consistent throughout the codebase and for consumers of this package. Each error has a descriptive message and clear documentation comments.
26-43: Good refactoring of error returnsReplacing generic error messages with the standardized error variables improves consistency and makes error handling more structured.
45-60: Well-structured helper functionThis helper function effectively encapsulates the logic for retrieving components from a specific stack. The error wrapping adds context while preserving the original error types, making debugging easier.
83-92: Clean logic separationGood job refactoring this function to use the new helper functions. The code is now more readable with clearer separation of concerns between handling specific stacks and processing all stacks.
94-102: Solid component processingThe deduplication and sorting of components is maintained properly. The function handles the empty components case correctly.
|
💥 This pull request now has conflicts. Could you fix it @Cerebrovinny? 🙏 |
|
These changes were released in v1.168.0. |
what
Refactor list components for new lint standards
why
I will use this component in furter list components filter development and need to clean this up in order to reduce PR changes
references
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests