8000 Add ProofRule::CHAIN_M_RESOLUTION, disabled by default by ajreynol · Pull Request #11984 · cvc5/cvc5 · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Add ProofRule::CHAIN_M_RESOLUTION, disabled by default #11984

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ajreynol
Copy link
Member

This adds the definition of a proposed addition to CPC which mimics the behavior of what is currently called MACRO_RESOLTUION.

In my initial tests, the use of this rule is significantly faster than an elaboration to chain resolution.

In a followup, we should eliminate MACRO_RESOLUTION / MACRO_RESOLUTION_TRUST in favor of this rule to avoid redundant work in the post processor.

@ajreynol ajreynol requested review from HanielB and abdoo8080 June 16, 2025 14:50
@ajreynol ajreynol added normal Priority moderate Complexity labels Jun 16, 2025
@ajreynol
Copy link
Member Author

This makes proof generation 9% faster on SMT-LIB logics minus BV,FP.

* This rule combines Resolution + Factoring + Reordering.
*
* .. math::
* \inferrule{C_1 \dots C_n \mid C, (pol_1 \dots pol_{n-1}), (L_1 \dots L_{n-1})}{C}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

$$\frac{C_1 \dots C_n \mid C, (pol_1 \dots pol_{n-1}), (L_1 \dots L_{n-1})}{C}$$

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this a suggestion? Or just a comment?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a comment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
moderate Complexity normal Priority
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0