fix: indicate upstream packages for sbom cataloger #3849
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Hu <victorhu493@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Hu <victorhu493@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
To include the GENERATED_FROM relationships is a good way to resolve the issue, (
but there might be better solutions to it,or maybe it's up to Grype not to make the upstream package false positive)Proposal: we can preserve the name&version pair of the upstream packages in the comment field of the relationship like evidence/ownership-by-file-overlap or and strip the upstream packages out.This proposal will introduce huge amounts of updates ,so the first option is preferred. Keep the packages as they were.
Type of change
Checklist: