-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Log offending websocket client address when no protocols overlap #10564
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #10564 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #10564 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.69% 98.70%
=======================================
Files 122 124 +2
Lines 37246 37335 +89
Branches 2065 2063 -2
=======================================
+ Hits 36761 36850 +89
Misses 338 338
Partials 147 147
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Backport to 3.11: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #10575 🤖 @patchback |
) <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? Logs the remote address of a WebSocket client that has no overlapping protocols ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? Which client has the problem should be a bit more discoverable ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? no ## Related issue number closes #10563 (cherry picked from commit a59e74b)
Backport to 3.12: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #10576 🤖 @patchback |
) <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? Logs the remote address of a WebSocket client that has no overlapping protocols ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? Which client has the problem should be a bit more discoverable ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? no ## Related issue number closes #10563 (cherry picked from commit a59e74b)
…dress when no protocols overlap (#10575) **This is a backport of PR #10564 as merged into master (a59e74b).** <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? Logs the remote address of a WebSocket client that has no overlapping protocols ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? Which client has the problem should be a bit more discoverable ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? no ## Related issue number closes #10563 Co-authored-by: J. Nick Koston <nick@koston.org>
…dress when no protocols overlap (#10576) **This is a backport of PR #10564 as merged into master (a59e74b).** <!-- Thank you for your contribution! --> ## What do these changes do? Logs the remote address of a WebSocket client that has no overlapping protocols ## Are there changes in behavior for the user? Which client has the problem should be a bit more discoverable ## Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this? no ## Related issue number closes #10563 Co-authored-by: J. Nick Koston <nick@koston.org>
What do these changes do?
Logs the remote address of a WebSocket client that has no overlapping protocols
Are there changes in behavior for the user?
Which client has the problem should be a bit more discoverable
Is it a substantial burden for the maintainers to support this?
no
Related issue number
closes #10563