#6958: Clarify documentation #6982
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@plt-amy : You are assigned, do you want to merge it yourself? |
|
Thanks! |
JobPetrovcic
pushed a commit
to JobPetrovcic/agda
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Marking a primitive opaque did not have an effect before, and Agda will now warn if you try it, so I removed the sentence from the docs per @nad's suggestion. However I have not yet excised the opacity field from primitives, since I believe the
IsAbstractfield should be removed too, and I'd prefer to do that in one PR.