-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
Remove refs to InfrahubServices
for git ops
#6406
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #6406 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
|
||
return self.service.client | ||
return self.client |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It could perhaps be a follow up PR but I think we should get rid of the sdk
property.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
9da3379
to
dbf453a
Compare
fa36fe1
to
0a68cd2
Compare
0a68cd2
to
2ee0889
Compare
This change tries to remove the need for a `InfrahubServices` object when it comes to operations to be performed on a git repository. This work is a stepping stone to be able to run user flagged workflows inside a dedicated prefect worker for isolation purpose as we won't be able to inject a `InfrahubServices` object into, also we don't want to for security reasons.
2ee0889
to
71ab8ad
Compare
This change tries to remove the need for a
InfrahubServices
object when it comes to operations to be performed on a git repository.This work is a stepping stone to be able to run user flagged workflows inside a dedicated prefect worker for isolation purpose as we won't be able to inject a
InfrahubServices
object into, also we don't want to for security reasons.