-
-
You must be signed in to change notification settings -
test: fix user field filter test #8521
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Raju Udava <86527202+dstala@users.noreply.github.com>
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent changes focus on enhancing user selection handling in the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
const selectUser = () => | ||
this.rootPage | ||
.locator(`.nc-dropdown-user-select-cell`) | ||
.getByTestId('select-option-User-filter') | ||
.getByText(v[i]) | ||
.click({ force: true }); | ||
await this.waitForResponse({ | ||
uiAction: selectUser, | ||
httpMethodsToMatch: ['GET'], | ||
requestUrlPathToMatch: `/api/v1/db/data/noco/`, | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Refactor the user selection logic to improve maintainability.
The selectUser
method has been introduced to encapsulate user selection logic. However, the current implementation within the add
method still contains complex logic for user selection. Consider refactoring this to use the new selectUser
method more effectively, which will improve code maintainability and readability.
- const selectUser = () =>
- this.rootPage
- .locator(`.nc-dropdown-user-select-cell`)
- .getByTestId('select-option-User-filter')
- .getByText(v[i])
- .click({ force: true });
- await this.waitForResponse({
- uiAction: selectUser,
- httpMethodsToMatch: ['GET'],
- requestUrlPathToMatch: `/api/v1/db/data/noco/`,
- });
+ await this.selectUser(v[i]);
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
const selectUser = () => | |
this.rootPage | |
.locator(`.nc-dropdown-user-select-cell`) | |
.getByTestId('select-option-User-filter') | |
.getByText(v[i]) | |
.click({ force: true }); | |
await this.waitForResponse({ | |
uiAction: selectUser, | |
httpMethodsToMatch: ['GET'], | |
requestUrlPathToMatch: `/api/v1/db/data/noco/`, | |
}); | |
await this.selectUser(v[i]); |
Signed-off-by: Raju Udava <86527202+dstala@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- tests/playwright/pages/Account/Users.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/playwright/pages/Base.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/playwright/tests/db/usersAccounts/accountUserManagement.spec.ts (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- tests/playwright/pages/Base.ts
Additional comments not posted (4)
tests/playwright/tests/db/usersAccounts/accountUserManagement.spec.ts (3)
69-69
: LGTM! Ensure this change improves test stability as expected.
81-81
: LGTM! Ensure this change improves test stability as expected.
91-91
: LGTM! Ensure this change improves test stability as expected.tests/playwright/pages/Account/Users.ts (1)
49-54
: Refactored invite action to includewaitForResponse
. Ensure this change enhances reliability by properly handling server responses.Verification successful
Verification of
waitForResponse
Method ImplementationThe
waitForResponse
method inBase.ts
is implemented to wait for a server response based on specified criteria, ensuring that the UI action is completed successfully before proceeding. This method is designed to enhance the reliability of tests by confirming the action's success.Key Points of the Implementation:
Parameters:
uiAction
: The Playwright action that triggers the request.httpMethodsToMatch
: HTTP methods to match (default is an empty array).requestUrlPathToMatch
: URL path to match.responseJsonMatcher
: Optional function to match the response JSON.timeout
: Optional timeout for the response.responseStatusCodeToMatch
: Status code to match (default is 200).Functionality:
- Waits for the response that matches the specified URL path, status code, and HTTP method.
- Executes the UI action.
- Optionally matches the response JSON if a matcher function is provided.
Conclusion:
The implementation of the
waitForResponse
method appears to be robust and should enhance the reliability of the invite functionality by ensuring that the server response is correctly handled.Actionable Directive:
- Ensure that the
waitForResponse
method is correctly integrated and tested within the invite functionality to confirm its effectiveness.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the change on the invite functionality. # Test: Trigger the invite action and check if it waits for the server response as expected. echo "Trigger the invite action and observe if it properly waits for the server response."Length of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of the waitForResponse method in the codebase ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'waitForResponse({ uiAction: $_, httpMethodsToMatch: $_, requestUrlPathToMatch: $_ })' # Search for the usage of the waitForResponse method in the codebase to verify its usage rg 'waitForResponse'Length of output: 11756
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of the waitForResponse method from Base.ts ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'async waitForResponse({ uiAction: $_, httpMethodsToMatch: $_, requestUrlPathToMatch: $_ })' tests/playwright/pages/Base.tsLength of output: 162
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of the waitForResponse method in Base.ts rg 'async waitForResponse' tests/playwright/pages/Base.tsLength of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full implementation of the waitForResponse method from Base.ts sed -n '/async waitForResponse/,/}/p' tests/playwright/pages/Base.tsLength of output: 438
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full implementation of the waitForResponse method from Base.ts sed -n '/async waitForResponse/,/^}/p' tests/playwright/pages/Base.tsLength of output: 4633
Change Summary
Provide summary of changes with issue number if any.
Change type
Test/ Verification
Provide summary of changes.
Additional information / screenshots (optional)
Anything for maintainers to be made aware of