8000 test: fix user field filter test by dstala · Pull Request #8521 · nocodb/nocodb · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

test: fix user field filter test #8521

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 18, 2024
Merged

test: fix user field filter test #8521

merged 2 commits into from
May 18, 2024

Conversation

dstala
Copy link
Member
@dstala dstala commented May 18, 2024

Change Summary

Provide summary of changes with issue number if any.

Change type

  • feat: (new feature for the user, not a new feature for build script)
  • fix: (bug fix for the user, not a fix to a build script)
  • docs: (changes to the documentation)
  • style: (formatting, missing semi colons, etc; no production code change)
  • refactor: (refactoring production code, eg. renaming a variable)
  • test: (adding missing tests, refactoring tests; no production code change)
  • chore: (updating grunt tasks etc; no production code change)

Test/ Verification

Provide summary of changes.

Additional information / screenshots (optional)

Anything for maintainers to be made aware of

Signed-off-by: Raju Udava <86527202+dstala@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented May 18, 2024
Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent changes focus on enhancing user selection handling in the ToolbarFilterPage class within Filter.ts, introducing a new method selectUser and refining the logic for user selection. Additionally, improvements include the addition of waitForResponse calls with specific parameters for UI action, HTTP methods, and request URL path matching.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
tests/playwright/pages/Dashboard/common/Toolbar/Filter.ts Refactored ToolbarFilterPage class by adding selectUser method and updating user selection logic with waitForResponse call.
tests/playwright/pages/Account/Users.ts Modified AccountUsersPage class by adjusting inviteUserModal click action and introducing waitForResponse method with specific parameters.
tests/playwright/tests/db/usersAccounts/accountUserManagement.spec.ts Updated waitForResponse parameter in goto method calls for accountUsersPage to impact user invitation, role update, and user deletion behavior.
tests/playwright/pages/Base.ts No changes in this file.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 86a55ed and 951a0de.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/playwright/pages/Dashboard/common/Toolbar/Filter.ts (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +331 to +341
const selectUser = () =>
this.rootPage
.locator(`.nc-dropdown-user-select-cell`)
.getByTestId('select-option-User-filter')
.getByText(v[i])
.click({ force: true });
await this.waitForResponse({
uiAction: selectUser,
httpMethodsToMatch: ['GET'],
requestUrlPathToMatch: `/api/v1/db/data/noco/`,
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactor the user selection logic to improve maintainability.

The selectUser method has been introduced to encapsulate user selection logic. However, the current implementation within the add method still contains complex logic for user selection. Consider refactoring this to use the new selectUser method more effectively, which will improve code maintainability and readability.

- const selectUser = () =>
-   this.rootPage
-     .locator(`.nc-dropdown-user-select-cell`)
-     .getByTestId('select-option-User-filter')
-     .getByText(v[i])
-     .click({ force: true });
- await this.waitForResponse({
-   uiAction: selectUser,
-   httpMethodsToMatch: ['GET'],
-   requestUrlPathToMatch: `/api/v1/db/data/noco/`,
- });
+ await this.selectUser(v[i]);

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
const selectUser = () =>
this.rootPage
.locator(`.nc-dropdown-user-select-cell`)
.getByTestId('select-option-User-filter')
.getByText(v[i])
.click({ force: true });
await this.waitForResponse({
uiAction: selectUser,
httpMethodsToMatch: ['GET'],
requestUrlPathToMatch: `/api/v1/db/data/noco/`,
});
await this.selectUser(v[i]);

Signed-off-by: Raju Udava <86527202+dstala@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 951a0de and 2266159.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • tests/playwright/pages/Account/Users.ts (1 hunks)
  • tests/playwright/pages/Base.ts (1 hunks)
  • tests/playwright/tests/db/usersAccounts/accountUserManagement.spec.ts (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • tests/playwright/pages/Base.ts
Additional comments not posted (4)
tests/playwright/tests/db/usersAccounts/accountUserManagement.spec.ts (3)

69-69: LGTM! Ensure this change improves test stability as expected.


81-81: LGTM! Ensure this change improves test stability as expected.


91-91: LGTM! Ensure this change improves test stability as expected.

tests/playwright/pages/Account/Users.ts (1)

49-54: Refactored invite action to include waitForResponse. Ensure this change enhances reliability by properly handling server responses.

Verification successful

Verification of waitForResponse Method Implementation

The waitForResponse method in Base.ts is implemented to wait for a server response based on specified criteria, ensuring that the UI action is completed successfully before proceeding. This method is designed to enhance the reliability of tests by confirming the action's success.

Key Points of the Implementation:

  • Parameters:

    • uiAction: The Playwright action that triggers the request.
    • httpMethodsToMatch: HTTP methods to match (default is an empty array).
    • requestUrlPathToMatch: URL path to match.
    • responseJsonMatcher: Optional function to match the response JSON.
    • timeout: Optional timeout for the response.
    • responseStatusCodeToMatch: Status code to match (default is 200).
  • Functionality:

    • Waits for the response that matches the specified URL path, status code, and HTTP method.
    • Executes the UI action.
    • Optionally matches the response JSON if a matcher function is provided.

Conclusion:

The implementation of the waitForResponse method appears to be robust and should enhance the reliability of the invite functionality by ensuring that the server response is correctly handled.

Actionable Directive:

  • Ensure that the waitForResponse method is correctly integrated and tested within the invite functionality to confirm its effectiveness.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the change on the invite functionality.

# Test: Trigger the invite action and check if it waits for the server response as expected.
echo "Trigger the invite action and observe if it properly waits for the server response."

Length of output: 176



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the implementation of the waitForResponse method in the codebase
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'waitForResponse({ uiAction: $_, httpMethodsToMatch: $_, requestUrlPathToMatch: $_ })' 

# Search for the usage of the waitForResponse method in the codebase to verify its usage
rg 'waitForResponse'

Length of output: 11756



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the implementation of the waitForResponse method from Base.ts
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'async waitForResponse({ uiAction: $_, httpMethodsToMatch: $_, requestUrlPathToMatch: $_ })' tests/playwright/pages/Base.ts

Length of output: 162



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition of the waitForResponse method in Base.ts
rg 'async waitForResponse' tests/playwright/pages/Base.ts

Length of output: 85



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the full implementation of the waitForResponse method from Base.ts
sed -n '/async waitForResponse/,/}/p' tests/playwright/pages/Base.ts

Length of output: 438



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the full implementation of the waitForResponse method from Base.ts
sed -n '/async waitForResponse/,/^}/p' tests/playwright/pages/Base.ts

Length of output: 4633

@dstala dstala requested a review from pranavxc May 18, 2024 13:06
@pranavxc pranavxc merged commit aaffd2e into develop May 18, 2024
17 checks passed
@pranavxc pranavxc deleted the test/fix-user-field-test branch May 18, 2024 13:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0