-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
[UHxIZ8JO] Add CodeQL #186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
dd6146f
to
8c1c00a
Compare
2780cdb
to
24ca169
Compare
We want to ignore PRs from this security researcher because they do not follow our private disclosure process. These PRs highlight that our code is exploitable before we've had the opportunity to fix it. However, we will take JLLeitschuh up on his suggestion to add https://github.com/github/codeql-action to run checks in the background.
The file was removed because it contained some vulnerabilities, and also because it was not used. It's also not used in APOC Extended.
46f1d98
to
afcf584
Compare
* @author mh | ||
* @since 17.01.14 | ||
*/ | ||
public class ElementCounter { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this used in extended?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Daniel has confirmed this was not used in extended
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with the exception of the small comment I left
The CodeQL job is not decoupled from the main CI job. This is because CodeQL requires the artefacts to be built, and I didn't think it was worth to build the project twice.