8000 LCOW: (Experimental) Require RS5+ builds by lowenna · Pull Request #39108 · moby/moby · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

LCOW: (Experimental) Require RS5+ builds #39108

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 19, 2019

Conversation

lowenna
Copy link
Member
@lowenna lowenna commented Apr 18, 2019

Signed-off-by: John Howard jhoward@microsoft.com

This moves the requirement for the experimental LCOW feature to at least RS5 builds of Windows, as per #33850 (comment).

The current LCOW solution uses the HCS "v1" schema. With the move to a containerd runtime, we are no longer planning on supporting LCOW support in the v1 schema in opengcs, and have been investing heavily in LCOW support through the v2 schema (driven via containerd, through hcsshim, and onto HCS; called from CRI, Kube, Docker,....).

Phase 2 of this will be to move the graphdriver remote filesystem access away from v1 as well.
Phase 3 will be the deprecation of the "local" libcontainerd runtime in favour of containerd which will only use the "v2" HCS schema.

@dmcgowan @crosbymichael @thaJeztah @jterry75 FYI.

Signed-off-by: John Howard <jhoward@microsoft.com>
Copy link
Member
@thaJeztah thaJeztah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SGTM

@jterry75
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM! (not a maintainer)

Signed-off-by: John Howard <jhoward@microsoft.com>
Copy link
Member
@thaJeztah thaJeztah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member
@dmcgowan dmcgowan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Apr 19, 2019

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@92a6266). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #39108   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ? 
8000
  37.01%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      612           
  Lines             ?    45390           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    16799           
  Misses            ?    26307           
  Partials          ?     2284

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants
0