8000 Updated Readthedocs documentation in line with current practices. by Kat-90 · Pull Request #2048 · metoppv/improver · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Updated Readthedocs documentation in line with current practices. #2048

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

Kat-90
Copy link
Contributor
@Kat-90 Kat-90 commented Nov 6, 2024

Addresses https://github.com/metoppv/mo-blue-team/issues/795

This PR updates the best practices sections on the Readthedocs site in line with our current ways of working.
To build the webpages locally attempt the following:

  • Activate the conda environment
  • Navigate to the improver top directory and enter: bin/improver-tests doc
  • Then: firefox doc/build/html/index.html

@Kat-90 Kat-90 self-assigned this Nov 6, 2024
@Kat-90 Kat-90 marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2024 15:57
Copy link
codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.38%. Comparing base (84a8944) to head (0e5098d).
Report is 42 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2048      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.39%   98.38%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         124      133       +9     
  Lines       12212    13063     +851     
==========================================
+ Hits        12016    12852     +836     
- Misses        196      211      +15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link
Contributor
@brhooper brhooper left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @Kat-90. I've made some suggestions, mostly for rephrasing sentences to aid readability. Feel free to ignore them if you don't think they represent improvements.

1. Issues should be assigned to a main reviewer. Adding multiple
reviewers to the pull request is encouraged to help share expertise.
Please ask for help assigning reviewers if you need it.
1. All reviewers are encouraged to add comments to the pull request.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The numbering in this section needs updating.

Comment on lines 164 to 165
bin/improver-tests unit # runs unit tests
bin/improver-tests --help # Prints out the help information
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These lines are also on 133-134. I think they can be removed here to avoid duplication.

Comment on lines 540 to 541
As mentioned above, it is important to ensure that no other functionality
than passing inputs into the plugin is done within the CLI layer.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
As mentioned above, it is important to ensure that no other functionality
than passing inputs into the plugin is done within the CLI layer.
As mentioned above, it is important to ensure that no functionality
other than calling the plugin exists within the CLI layer.

Comment on lines 542 to 543
So any checks on the data or requirements of inputs should be done in
the plugin itself.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
So any checks on the data or requirements of inputs should be done in
the plugin itself.
Any checks on the data or input requirements should be done in the plugin itself.

Comment on lines 40 to 42
* Avoid putting any functionality within the CLI at all other than
passing in arguments to the plugin, all functionality should be
done within the plugin layer itself.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* Avoid putting any functionality within the CLI at all other than
passing in arguments to the plugin, all functionality should be
done within the plugin layer itself.
* Avoid adding functionality to CLIs beyond calling the relevant plugin, all other functionality should be added to the plugin itself.

@@ -80,6 +75,7 @@ As a Reviewer:

* Does the code do what is supposed to?
* Are errors handled appropriately?
* Is the code written to be run efficiently?
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* Is the code written to be run efficiently?
* Is the code efficient with respect to processing time and memory requirements?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is also a typo under 5.d which could be corrected here:

Does the code do what is supposed to? -> Does the code do what it is supposed to?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I've changed both.

brhooper
brhooper previously approved these changes Nov 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor
@brhooper brhooper left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for these changes @Kat-90. I'm happy to approve this now.

Katie-Howard
Katie-Howard previously approved these changes Nov 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor
@Katie-Howard Katie-Howard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This all looks fine now, so I'm happy to approve the changes 👍

Copy link
Contributor
@Katie-Howard Katie-Howard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like the tests all pass now so I'm happy with these changes 👍

@Katie-Howard Katie-Howard merged commit 6e4a898 into metoppv:master Nov 21, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0