-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
Issues: matrix-org/matrix-spec
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
Data type of An idea/future MSC for the spec
url
field within Application Service registration file is confusing
improvement
#2155
opened May 29, 2025 by
anoadragon453
MSC's should always use their unstable prefix when describing event properties or schema.
#2152
opened May 27, 2025 by
Gnuxie
Recommend clients avoid including any invitations in the top level of the client.
improvement
An idea/future MSC for the spec
#2146
opened May 23, 2025 by
Gnuxie
Recommend clients avoid notifying for invitations and showing any room information in notifications
improvement
An idea/future MSC for the spec
#2145
opened May 23, 2025 by
Gnuxie
How should m.room.canonical_alias be handled on room upgrade
clarification
An area where the expected behaviour is understood, but the spec could do with being more explicit
#2142
opened May 17, 2025 by
olivia-fl
Clarify Behavior When Inviting Non-Existent Users
clarification
An area where the expected behaviour is understood, but the spec could do with being more explicit
#2139
opened May 1, 2025 by
Jeff92316046
A users own invite event should not be stripped in sync
spec-bug
Something which is in the spec, but is wrong
#2138
opened Apr 27, 2025 by
olivia-fl
Client-side display aliases for rooma/users
improvement
An idea/future MSC for the spec
#2134
opened Apr 21, 2025 by
saihaze
$CHANACS / Assigning power levels to room IDs rather than user IDs
improvement
An idea/future MSC for the spec
#2129
opened Apr 9, 2025 by
Mikaela
What are the set(s) of core-events that are covered by the protocol.
clarification
An area where the expected behaviour is understood, but the spec could do with being more explicit
#2127
opened Mar 31, 2025 by
taqtiqa-mark
spec idea: roles
improvement
An idea/future MSC for the spec
#2126
opened Mar 31, 2025 by
mageOfstructs
Replace unmaintained klakegg/hugo container with hugomods/hugo
#2119
opened Mar 28, 2025 by
HarHarLinks
spaces: Is An area where the expected behaviour is understood, but the spec could do with being more explicit
{"via":[]}
considered valid?
clarification
#2118
opened Mar 28, 2025 by
VAWVAW
Chosen nickname/alias of a user should be respected (imported) when inviting them to a new space/room
improvement
An idea/future MSC for the spec
#2117
opened Mar 28, 2025 by
heyakyra
Should ignored users be dropped from m.typing and m.receipt events in sync?
clarification
An area where the expected behaviour is understood, but the spec could do with being more explicit
#2112
opened Mar 23, 2025 by
olivia-fl
Case insensitive behaviour is defined as server-side implementation detail
A-Push
clarification
An area where the expected behaviour is understood, but the spec could do with being more explicit
#2111
opened Mar 21, 2025 by
t3chguy
Signed messages in unencrypted rooms
improvement
An idea/future MSC for the spec
#2103
opened Mar 19, 2025 by
Saiv46
850C
GET /initialSync
's response mentions a limit
parameter which is not documented for the request
clarification
#2099
opened Mar 17, 2025 by
zecakeh
room_id
should be required in GET /events
for peeking
spec-bug
#2098
opened Mar 17, 2025 by
zecakeh
Spec says that room directory is not authed. But in practice, synapse auths it by default.
spec-bug
Something which is in the spec, but is wrong
#2097
opened Mar 17, 2025 by
ara4n
Specifying x-addedInMatrixVersion & friends prior to a release
#2096
opened Mar 14, 2025 by
Johennes
GET /_matrix/client/v3/directory/room/{roomAlias} is badly designed and leads clients into unsafe behaviour
#2092
opened Mar 8, 2025 by
Gnuxie
Unclear IP address syntax requirements
clarification
An area where the expected behaviour is understood, but the spec could do with being more explicit
#2090
opened Mar 5, 2025 by
CobaltCause
Previous Next
ProTip!
Type g i on any issue or pull request to go back to the issue listing page.