8000 Added Bhilai and Prague block for mainnet by pratikspatil024 · Pull Request #1581 · maticnetwork/bor · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Added Bhilai and Prague block for mainnet #1581

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2025

Conversation

pratikspatil024
Copy link
Member

Description

Bhilai Block for Mainnet is 73440256
Estimated Time is July-1-2025 9:11:25 AM +UTC

Changes

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change that solves an issue)
  • Hotfix (change that solves an urgent issue, and requires immediate attention)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (change that is not backwards-compatible and/or changes current functionality)
  • Changes only for a subset of nodes

Breaking changes

Please complete this section if any breaking changes have been made, otherwise delete it

Nodes audience

In case this PR includes changes that must be applied only to a subset of nodes, please specify how you handled it (e.g. by adding a flag with a default value...)

Checklist

  • I have added at least 2 reviewer or the whole pos-v1 team
  • I have added sufficient documentation in code
  • I will be resolving comments - if any - by pushing each fix in a separate commit and linking the commit hash in the comment reply
  • Created a task in Jira and informed the team for implementation in Erigon client (if applicable)
  • Includes RPC methods changes, and the Notion documentation has been updated

Cross repository changes

  • This PR requires changes to heimdall
    • In case link the PR here:
  • This PR requires changes to matic-cli
    • In case link the PR here:

Testing

  • I have added unit tests
  • I have added tests to CI
  • I have tested this code manually on local environment
  • I have tested this code manually on remote devnet using express-cli
  • I have tested this code manually on amoy
  • I have created new e2e tests into express-cli

Manual tests

Please complete this section with the steps you performed if you ran manual tests for this functionality, otherwise delete it

Additional comments

Please post additional comments in this section if you have them, otherwise delete it

Copy link
codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (v2.1.1-candidate@97c0728). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##             v2.1.1-candidate    #1581   +/-   ##
===================================================
  Coverage                    ?   50.47%           
===================================================
  Files                       ?      809           
  Lines                       ?   131291           
  Branches                    ?        0           
===================================================
  Hits                        ?    66269           
  Misses                      ?    60670           
  Partials                    ?     4352           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pratikspatil024 pratikspatil024 merged commit 1ad23ec into v2.1.1-candidate Jun 17, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
pratikspatil024 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
* added Bhilai and Prague block for mainnet (#1581)

* params: version bump to v2.1.1
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0