-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Batch (XLS-56) #5060
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Batch (XLS-56) #5060
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #5060 +/- ##
=========================================
+ Coverage 78.5% 78.6% +0.1%
=========================================
Files 813 816 +3
Lines 70084 70505 +421
Branches 8283 8291 +8
=========================================
+ Hits 55031 55439 +408
- Misses 15053 15066 +13
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
@dangell7 can you please update your branch? |
@XRPLF/rpc-reviewers can you please check and approve the RPC-related changes? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
All the comments from the requested changes have been resolved
adb41ee
to
afa63ca
Compare
## High Level Overview of Change <!-- Please include a summary/list of the changes. If too broad, please consider splitting into multiple PRs. --> Add support for Batch. ### Context of Change <!-- Please include the context of a change. If a bug fix, when was the bug introduced? What was the behavior? If a new feature, why was this architecture chosen? What were the alternatives? If a refactor, how is this better than the previous implementation? If there is a design document for this feature, please link it here. --> XRPLF/rippled#5060 ### Type of Change <!-- Please check relevant options, delete irrelevant ones. --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - [ ] Refactor (non-breaking change that only restructures code) - [ ] Tests (You added tests for code that already exists, or your new feature included in this PR) - [ ] Documentation Updates - [ ] Translation Updates - [ ] Release ## Before / After <!-- If just refactoring / back-end changes, this can be just an in-English description of the change at a technical level. If a UI change, screenshots should be included. --> ### Simple  ### Details tab (Description)  ### TableDetail 
High Level Overview of Change
XLS spec: https://github.com/XRPLF/XRPL-Standards/blob/master/XLS-0056d-batch/README.md
Context of Change
Type of Change
.gitignore
, formatting, dropping support for older tooling)API Impact
libxrpl
change (any change that may affectlibxrpl
or dependents oflibxrpl
)Test Plan
https://gist.github.com/dangell7/3afbe8c4597a58dc2b02be598f9b7d54