8000 Decrease anomaly rate in CI testing to avoid GPT4TS outputting NaNs by WenjieDu · Pull Request #723 · WenjieDu/PyPOTS · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Decrease anomaly rate in CI testing to avoid GPT4TS outputting NaNs #723

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2025

Conversation

WenjieDu
Copy link
Owner
@WenjieDu WenjieDu commented Apr 9, 2025

What does this PR do?

  1. fixing GPT4TS fails on time series imputation #710;

Before submitting

  • Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? Please add a link to it if that's the case.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have written necessary tests and already run them locally.

@WenjieDu WenjieDu merged commit 4899bac into dev Apr 9, 2025
8 checks passed
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 14353650845

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 1 unchanged line in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.006%) to 80.319%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
pypots/nn/modules/moment/backbone.py 1 13.54%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 14353566006: -0.006%
Covered Lines: 13827
Relevant Lines: 17215

💛 - Coveralls

@WenjieDu WenjieDu deleted the (test)decrease_anomaly_rate branch April 9, 2025 09:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0