8000 [Enhancement] supply attribute context for custom mark by kkxxkk2019 · Pull Request #1195 · VisActor/VChart · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

[Enhancement] supply attribute context for custom mark #1195

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2023

Conversation

kkxxkk2019
Copy link
Collaborator

🤔 This is a ...

  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • TypeScript definition update
  • Bundle size optimization
  • Performance optimization
  • Enhancement feature
  • Refactoring
  • Update dependency
  • Code style optimization
  • Test Case
  • Branch merge
  • Release
  • Site / documentation update
  • Demo update
  • Workflow
  • Other (about what?)

🔗 Related issue link

🔗 Related PR link

🐞 Bugserver case id

💡 Background and solution

📝 Changelog

Language Changelog
🇺🇸 English
🇨🇳 Chinese

☑️ Self-Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before requesting a reviewing. ⚠️

  • Doc is updated/provided or not needed
  • Demo is updated/provided or not needed
  • TypeScript definition is updated/provided or not needed
  • Changelog is provided or not needed

🚀 Summary

copilot:summary

🔍 Walkthrough

copilot:walkthrough

@kkxxkk2019 kkxxkk2019 requested a review from xuefei1313 October 10, 2023 08:56
@kkxxkk2019 kkxxkk2019 added this to the v1.5.1 milestone Oct 10, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs label Oct 10, 2023
@kkxxkk2019 kkxxkk2019 merged commit 838707d into dev/1.5.0 Oct 10, 2023
@kkxxkk2019 kkxxkk2019 deleted the feat/supply-attributeContext-for-customMark branch October 10, 2023 09:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0