8000 Improved parsing of Router Certificates by ties · Pull Request #95 · RIPE-NCC/rpki-commons · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Improved parsing of Router Certificates #95

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ties
Copy link
Member
@ties ties commented Oct 12, 2021

Partial implementation of the checks for router certificates in 0.
TO DO: check that AS resources are not inherited.

(Was reviewing code while reading part of the spec and while looking at objects)

@ties
Copy link
Member Author
ties commented Nov 3, 2021

Tests also need to be revisited. Part of the cases appear to be copied from resource certificates.

ties added 3 commits July 4, 2022 11:40
Partial implementation of the checks for router certificates in [0].
TO DO: check that AS resources are not inherited.

[0]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8209
@ties ties force-pushed the feature/improved-parsing-of-bgpsec-certificates branch from 252f8ea to c0f7709 Compare July 4, 2022 09:40
@ties ties changed the title WIP: Improved parsing of Router Certificates Improved parsing of Router Certificates Jul 5, 2022
@ties ties requested a review from erikrozendaal July 5, 2022 10:28
@ties ties force-pushed the feature/improved-parsing-of-bgpsec-certificates branch from ddccaeb to 4f4c298 Compare July 5, 2022 12:21
@ties
Copy link
Member Author
ties commented Jul 6, 2022

@erikrozendaal the public key validation should now be there. It is a bit more detail than I wanted, but it is in spec, and can not be validated through the java api.

The adjustments to the test harness (probably best to look at just the final two commits) feel a bit clumsy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0