8000 feat: Don't explicitly state the repository to test by typotter · Pull Request #184 · Eppo-exp/android-sdk · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

feat: Don't explicitly state the repository to test #184

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8000
Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 16, 2025
Merged

Conversation

typotter
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor
@aarsilv aarsilv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving although I think this is a duplicate of #182

@aarsilv aarsilv assigned typotter and unassigned leoromanovsky May 16, 2025
@typotter typotter changed the title feat: Allow ConfigurationStore to be overidden feat: Don't explicitly state the repository to test May 16, 2025
@@ -50,8 +54,8 @@ jobs:
- name: Check out Java SDK
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
repository: Eppo-exp/android-sdk
ref: ${{ env.SDK_BRANCH}}
repository: ${{ inputs.base_repo || github.repository }}
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When we re-use this workflow in the sdk-test-data repository, github.repository refers to the sdk-test-data repository instead of android-sdk, so we explicitly defined which repo to test. This prevents the test from running on a fork of the repo

@typotter typotter merged commit 727af6d into main May 16, 2025
3 checks passed
@typotter typotter deleted the tp/pub-cfg-store branch May 16, 2025 03:50
@aarsilv aarsilv removed their assignment May 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0