Create sorted output from the Picking phase, and rename transcripts/genes #23

lucventurini · 2015-10-04T12:45:09Z

This is actually a bit harder than it looks. I might have to re-engineer the picking to make it more similar to what is going on during the prepare step.

The renaming is not an issue by itself, it's pretty trivial, but its requirement for it to be done only if the output is sorted (to keep the progression straight) makes this more challenging than it would otherwise be.

…nded. Sorting might still be problematic b/c we might have overlapping +/- superloci, but in general it seems to function.

, re-opened and reclosed #5

…ing functions as intended. Sorting might still be problematic b/c we might have overlapping +/- superloci, but in general it seems to function.

lucventurini pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2015

Solved issue #24, underway #23, re-opened and reclosed #5

5c94f68

lucventurini pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2015

Closed issue #23. Expanded test set, now ID tagging functions as inte…

ac6ae19

…nded. Sorting might still be problematic b/c we might have overlapping +/- superloci, but in general it seems to function.

lucventurini closed this as completed Oct 5, 2015

lucventurini pushed a commit to lucventurini/mikado that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2021

Solved issue EI-CoreBioinformatics#24, underway EI-CoreBioinformatics#23

9bebe67

, re-opened and reclosed #5

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Create sorted output from the Picking phase, and rename transcripts/genes #23

Create sorted output from the Picking phase, and rename transcripts/genes #23

Create sorted output from the Picking phase, and rename transcripts/genes #23

Create sorted output from the Picking phase, and rename transcripts/genes #23

Comments