8000 [MINPROC-2201] Update ddev metadata validator to only error on required headers by alyssamui2 · Pull Request #20419 · DataDog/integrations-core · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

[MINPROC-2201] Update ddev metadata validator to only error on required headers #20419

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 13, 2025

Conversation

alyssamui2
Copy link
Contributor
@alyssamui2 alyssamui2 commented May 30, 2025

What does this PR do?

Currently, the ddev metadata validator errors if optional headers are missing. This PR is to update the validator logic to be consistent with the actual required headers.

Motivation

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/MINPROC-2201

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
  • If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

Copy link
codecov bot commented May 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.55%. Comparing base (f32fa4b) to head (e118bf5).
Report is 53 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
Flag Coverage Δ
active_directory 93.18% <ø> (ø)
activemq 52.80% <ø> (ø)
activemq_xml 82.20% <ø> (ø)
aerospike 88.83% <ø> (ø)
airflow 93.03% <ø> (ø)
amazon_msk 89.50% <ø> (ø)
ambari 85.75% <ø> (ø)
apache 95.08% <ø> (ø)
appgate_sdp 93.93% <ø> (ø)
arangodb 98.23% <ø> (ø)
argo_rollouts 90.00% <ø> (ø)
argo_workflows 89.61% <ø> (ø)
argocd 87.16% <ø> (-0.07%) ⬇️
aspdotnet 100.00% <ø> (ø)
avi_vantage 93.83% <ø> (ø)
aws_neuron 92.42% <ø> (ø)
azure_iot_edge 82.08% <ø> (ø)
boundary 100.00% <ø> (ø)
btrfs 83.33% <ø> (ø)
cacti 87.90% <ø> (ø)
calico 84.61% <ø> (ø)
cassandra 66.66% <ø> (ø)
cassandra_nodetool 93.16% <ø> (ø)
celery 95.45% <ø> (ø)
ceph 91.35% <ø> (ø)
cert_manager 77.41% <ø> (ø)
cilium 77.92% <ø> (ø)
cisco_aci 89.43% <ø> (-0.16%) ⬇️
citrix_hypervisor 87.97% <ø> (ø)
clickhouse 94.55% <ø> (ø)
cloud_foundry_api 96.11% <ø> (ø)
cloudera 99.51% <ø> (ø)
cockroachdb 92.98% <ø> (ø)
confluent_platform 81.96% <ø> (ø)
consul 91.92% <ø> (ø)
coredns 95.65% <ø> (ø)
couch 94.76% <ø> (ø)
couchbase 85.23% <ø> (ø)
crio 89.79% <ø> (ø)
datadog_checks_base 89.54% <ø> (+0.28%) ⬆️
datadog_checks_dev 77.61% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
datadog_checks_downloader 81.37% <ø> (+3.22%) ⬆️
datadog_cluster_agent 90.19% <ø> (ø)
dcgm 93.54% <ø> (ø)
ddev 87.99% <100.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
directory 97.11% <ø> (+0.22%) ⬆️
disk 87.72% <ø> (ø)
dns_check 93.84% <ø> (ø)
dotnetclr 84.05% <ø> (ø)
druid 97.70% <ø> (ø)
duckdb 84.53% <ø> (ø)
ecs_fargate 83.71% <ø> (ø)
eks_fargate 94.05% <ø> (ø)
elastic 93.92% <ø> (ø)
envoy 95.41% <ø> (+5.46%) ⬆️
esxi 93.98% <ø> (ø)
etcd 95.56% <ø> (ø)
exchange_server 93.06% <ø> (ø)
external_dns 89.28% <ø> (ø)
fluentd 84.21% <ø> (ø)
fluxcd 88.31% <ø> (ø)
fly_io 97.13% <ø> (ø)
foundationdb 82.77% <ø> (ø)
gearmand 77.84% <ø> (ø)
gitlab 92.27% <ø> (ø)
gitlab_runner 92.76% <ø> (ø)
glusterfs 80.00% <ø> (ø)
go_expvar 92.66% <ø> (ø)
gunicorn 93.28% <ø> (ø)
haproxy 95.35% <ø> (ø)
harbor 89.08% <ø> (-0.58%) ⬇️
hazelcast 92.30% <ø> (ø)
hdfs_datanode 89.63% <ø> (ø)
hdfs_namenode 86.60% <ø> (ø)
hive 51.42% <ø> (ø)
hivemq 61.90% <ø> (ø)
http_check 94.26% <ø> (ø)
hudi 73.91% <ø> (ø)
ibm_ace 92.25% <ø> (ø)
ibm_db2 86.29% <ø> (ø)
ibm_i 82.36% <ø> (ø)
ibm_mq 91.46% <ø> (+0.13%) ⬆️
ibm_was 96.06% <ø> (ø)
ignite 46.66% <ø> (ø)
iis 95.02% <ø> (ø)
impala 97.97% <ø> (ø)
infiniband 92.34% <ø> (ø)
istio 77.86% <ø> (ø)
jboss_wildfly 47.36% <ø> (ø)
kafka 64.70% <ø> (ø)
kafka_consumer 92.55% <ø> (+1.51%) ⬆️
karpenter 95.06% <ø> (ø)
keda 88.05% <ø> (ø)
kong 88.42% <ø> (ø)
kube_apiserver_metrics 97.75% <ø> (ø)
kube_controller_manager 97.88% <ø> (ø)
kube_dns 95.94% <ø> (ø)
kube_metrics_server 94.87% <ø> (ø)
kube_proxy 96.80% <ø> (ø)
kube_scheduler 97.92% <ø> (ø)
kubeflow 93.22% <ø> (ø)
kubelet 91.09% <ø> (ø)
kubernetes_cluster_autoscaler 93.22% <ø> (ø)
kubernetes_state 89.49% <ø> (ø)
kubevirt_api 82.75% <ø> (ø)
kubevirt_controller 85.36% <ø> (ø)
kubevirt_handler 91.32% <ø> (ø)
kuma 79.03% <ø> (?)
kyototycoon 85.96% <ø> (ø)
kyverno 82.27% <ø> (ø)
lighttpd 83.64% <ø> (ø)
linkerd 84.70% <ø> (ø)
linux_proc_extras 96.20% <ø> (ø)
mapr 82.70% <ø> (ø)
mapreduce 81.99% <ø> (ø)
marathon 83.06% <ø> (ø)
marklogic 96.08% <ø> (+2.37%) ⬆️
mcache 93.99% <ø> (ø)
mesos_master 89.71% <ø> (ø)
milvus 92.30% <ø> (ø)
mongo 93.12% <ø> (+0.22%) ⬆️
mysql 89.30% <ø> (+0.15%) ⬆️
nagios 89.01% <ø> (ø)
network 93.89% <ø> (ø)
nfsstat 94.67% <ø> (-0.54%) ⬇️
nginx 94.65% <ø> (ø)
nginx_ingress_controller 98.55% <ø> (ø)
nvidia_nim 93.10% <ø> (ø)
nvidia_triton 88.52% <ø> (ø)
octopus_deploy 99.25% <ø> (ø)
openldap 96.33% <ø> (ø)
openmetrics 98.05% <ø> (ø)
openstack 55.11% <ø> (ø)
openstack_controller 94.65% <ø> (ø)
pdh_check 95.65% <ø> (ø)
pgbouncer 94.91% <ø> (ø)
php_fpm 90.45% <ø> (ø)
postfix 88.04% <ø> (ø)
postgres 93.09% <ø> (+3.44%) ⬆️
powerdns_recursor 96.65% <ø> (ø)
presto 59.09% <ø> (ø)
process 85.99% <ø> (ø)
prometheus 94.17% <ø> (ø)
proxysql 98.97% <ø> (ø)
pulsar 100.00% <ø> (ø)
quarkus 100.00% <ø> (ø)
rabbitmq 95.67% <ø> (ø)
ray 96.45% <ø> (ø)
redisdb 89.72% <ø> (ø)
rethinkdb 98.27% <ø> (ø)
riak 99.21% <ø> (ø)
riakcs 88.82% <ø> (ø)
sap_hana 90.54% <ø> (ø)
scylla 98.82% <ø> (ø)
silk 93.91% <ø> (ø)
silverstripe_cms 76.00% <ø> (ø)
singlestore 91.70% <ø> (ø)
slurm 90.86% <ø> (+1.53%) ⬆️
snmp 95.71% <ø> (ø)
snowflake 96.27% <ø> (ø)
solr 56.25% <ø> (ø)
sonarqube 98.10% <ø> (ø)
sonatype_nexus 76.69% <ø> (ø)
spark 93.50% <ø> (+0.30%) ⬆️
sqlserver 90.43% <ø> (+3.65%) ⬆️
squid 100.00% <ø> (ø)
ssh_check 91.32% <ø> (ø)
statsd 87.36% <ø> (ø)
strimzi 89.78% <ø> (ø)
supabase 93.97% <ø> (ø)
supervisord 90.14% <ø> (ø)
system_core 92.52% <ø> (ø)
system_swap 98.30% <ø> (ø)
tcp_check 92.05% <ø> (ø)
teamcity 87.39% <ø> (ø)
tekton 82.45% <ø> (ø)
teleport 98.16% <ø> (ø)
temporal 100.00% <ø> (ø)
teradata 94.27% <ø> (ø)
tibco_ems 91.98% <ø> (ø)
tls 90.26% <ø> (ø)
tomcat 60.41% <ø> (ø)
torchserve 97.32% <ø> (ø)
traefik_mesh 76.75% <ø> (ø)
traffic_server 96.13% <ø> (ø)
twemproxy 79.45% <ø> (ø)
twistlock 80.41% <ø> (ø)
varnish 84.22% <ø> (ø)
vault 95.67% <ø> (ø)
velero 85.00% <ø> (ø)
vertica 98.34% <ø> (ø)
vllm 94.44% <ø> (ø)
voltdb 96.84% <ø> (ø)
vsphere 96.62% <ø> (ø)
weaviate 76.27% <ø> (ø)
weblogic 70.83% <ø> (ø)
win32_event_log 86.54% <ø> (ø)
windows_performance_counters 98.36% <ø> (ø)
windows_service 94.53% <ø> (ø)
wmi_check 92.91% <ø> (ø)
yarn 89.93% <ø> (ø)
zk 82.30% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@alyssamui2 alyssamui2 self-assigned this May 30, 2025
@iliakur
Copy link
Contributor
iliakur commented Jun 2, 2025

@alyssamui2 should we remove the ddev validation and replace it with APW ones? maintaining both at the same time sounds like a time sink.

@alyssamui2
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alyssamui2 should we remove the ddev validation and replace it with APW ones? maintaining both at the same time sounds like a time sink.

I've been told that the plan is that the ddev validators will eventually be removed so we can consolidate into 1 validator in the future.

steveny91
steveny91 previously approved these changes Jun 3, 2025
Kyle-Neale
Kyle-Neale previously approved these changes Jun 3, 2025
@alyssamui2 alyssamui2 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 9, 2025 14:41
@temporal-github-worker-1 temporal-github-worker-1 bot dismissed stale reviews from steveny91 and Kyle-Neale June 9, 2025 14:41

Review from steveny91 is dismissed. Related teams and files:

  • agent-integrations
    • zk/metadata.csv

Review from Kyle-Neale is dismissed. Related teams and files:

  • agent-integrations
    • zk/metadata.csv
@dd-devflow
Copy link
dd-devflow bot commented Jun 9, 2025

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-06-09 14:44:31 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /to-staging
If you need support, contact us on Slack #devflow!


2025-06-09 14:44:31 UTCDevflow: /to-staging

This command is disabled.

If you need support, contact us on Slack #devflow with those details!

@alyssamui2
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link
dd-devflow bot commented Jun 12, 2025

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-06-12 14:01:21 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2025-06-12 14:01:40 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2025-06-12 18:02:13 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

@alyssamui2
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link
dd-devflow bot commented Jun 13, 2025

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2025-06-13 15:19:58 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2025-06-13 15:20:12 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2025-06-13 19:21:16 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

@Kyle-Neale Kyle-Neale added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 13, 2025
@Kyle-Neale
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

integrations-core doesn't use devflow merge queue but GH merge queue instead.

@alyssamui2
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

integrations-core doesn't use devflow merge queue but GH merge queue instead.

Ah I didn't know 😅 Thanks for adding it for me!

@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Jun 13, 2025
@steveny91 steveny91 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 13, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Jun 13, 2025
@Kyle-Neale Kyle-Neale added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 13, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit fd9914d Jun 13, 2025
456 of 466 checks passed
@Kyle-Neale Kyle-Neale deleted the alyssamui2/update-required-metadata-headers branch June 13, 2025 20:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants
0