Bump actions/setup-go from 5.2.0 to 5.5.0 #36891
Conversation
Bumps [actions/setup-go](https://github.com/actions/setup-go) from 5.2.0 to 5.5.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/setup-go/releases) - [Commits](actions/setup-go@3041bf5...d35c59a) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/setup-go dependency-version: 5.5.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Serverless Benchmark Results
tl;drUse these benchmarks as an insight tool during development.
What is this benchmarking?The The benchmark is run using a large variety of lambda request payloads. In the charts below, there is one row for each event payload type. How do I interpret these charts?The charts below comes from The benchstat docs explain how to interpret these charts.
I need more helpFirst off, do not worry if the benchmarks are failing. They are not tests. The intention is for them to be a tool for you to use during development. If you would like a hand interpreting the results come chat with us in Benchmark stats |
Datadog Summary✅ Dependencies Was this helpful? Give us feedback! |
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision✅ Passed |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: db91f80 Optimization Goals: ❌ Regression(s) detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | +10.36 | [+6.07, +14.65] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +1.61 | [-1.18, +4.39] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.48 | [+0.43, +0.53] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.41 | [+0.35, +0.46] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | docker_containers_memory | memory utilization | +0.33 | [+0.27, +0.39] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.10 | [-0.02, +0.22] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders | memory utilization | +0.10 | [+0.06, +0.14] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.05 | [-0.59, +0.69] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.04 | [-0.59, +0.67] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.04 | [-0.59, +0.68] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.60, +0.65] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.02] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.30, +0.29] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.68, +0.65] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.63, +0.59] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.03 | [-0.69, +0.64] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics | memory utilization | -0.03 | [-0.18, +0.13] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.03 | [-0.26, +0.21] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.08 | [-0.94, +0.79] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics | memory utilization | -0.09 | [-0.20, +0.03] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_logs | memory utilization | -0.20 | [-0.33, -0.08] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_logs | memory utilization | -0.21 | [-0.33, -0.09] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.60 | [-0.74, -0.47] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | docker_containers_memory | memory_usage | 9/10 | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_cpu | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_memory | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
Bumps actions/setup-go from 5.2.0 to 5.5.0.
Release notes
Sourced from actions/setup-go's releases.
Commits
d35c59achore: update discussions url (#527)29694d7Add manifest validation and improve error handling (#586)78535ddBump eslint-plugin-jest from 27.9.0 to 28.11.0 (#537)bb65d88Bump ts-jest from 29.1.2 to 29.3.2 (#582)7f17e83Bump@actions/globfrom 0.4.0 to 0.5.0 (#573)dca8468Update self-hosted environment validation and bump undici version (#556)691cc35upgrade actions/cache to 4.0.3 (#574)0aaccfdBump undici from 5.28.4 to 5.28.5 (#541)c4c1141upgrade actions/cache to 4.0.2 (#568)5a083d0Bump eslint-config-prettier from 8.10.0 to 10.0.1 (#536)You can trigger a rebase of this PR by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot mergewill merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and mergewill squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel mergewill cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopenwill reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot closewill close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)