-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Annotation field #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You need to add at least two tests showing:
- that the package can handle the 'property' tag
- that the package writes out the 'annotation' file into an ex file
(which should have been done before the implementation.)
You need to add some tests for this new code. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add a test to check that the annotation you are expecting appears in an output file.
We will need to change this annotation extraction because it would be better to have it put into a separate file that makes statements about the group. But we will leave that for after this PR. One thing that this will mean is that this information will not be available from the ex file in the near future. |
Just made the changes as requested. Additionally, I agree with having a separate file for annotation groups. |
Adding a new stored string field to the generated EX file when the XML has a 'type' (e.g. Axon or Dendrite) in its .