Numberguy6

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

• Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
• Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
• Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
• If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
• If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
• Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
• You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! Ultimateria (talk) 04:30, 25 September 2019 (UTC) *Copy Copy*Reply

I think the stress patterns may be wrong. "Eye" is at least as strongly stressed as "ap(ple)", if not more so. Would it make sense to use two primary stresses since they are two separate words? Equinox ◑ 23:03, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I think we could do that. --Numberguy6 (talk) 23:08, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

There is a current vote on this. I recommend that you consider it before creating more entries that may end up getting deleted. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 18:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hey. Thanks for your work in Icelandic. If you want something to do, and feel comfortable with it, can I ask you to look at Category:Tbot entries (Icelandic)? This is a category of lots of Icelandic entries made 10 years ago by a bot, and they haven't been checked since then so may contain many errors. Thanks in advance. --Guiri Falso (talk) 14:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

As Afrihili is a conlang with rather hard-to-access documentation, it's especially useful to reference your entries in it. If you're using William Annis's writeup, you can just reference that. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 05:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Just so you know, you never have to create categories if this is the sole content. They get created by regular bot runs every few days or so. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 18:45, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Just curious, why do you think creating thousands of formulaic entries for place names in California is a good use of your time? DTLHS (talk) 01:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for helping with a few Greek terms - but please double check when you make an entry — the translation ελεφαντόδοντο = elephant's tusk or ivory. — Saltmarsh. 06:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hey. Thanks for your work in Lithuanian. If you want something to do, and feel comfortable with it, can I ask you to look at Category:Tbot entries (Lithuanian)? Entries made 10 years ago by a bot, not been checked since then so may contain many errors. Thanks in advance. La más guay (talk) 23:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

At least the proper nouns. How wrong could Gibraltaras and Tanzanija be, anyway? La más guay (talk) 23:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

OK, maybe you're not the best guy for the Lithuanian job - you clearly edit in loads of languages, so probably aren't too familiar with any La más guay (talk) 00:25, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

You are correct. I am only copying from other editions of Wiktionary. --Numberguy6 (talk) 00:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Probably not the best idea, because people like me make Wiktionary. La más guay (talk) 00:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, stop copying from other Wiktionaries. You're not checking anything, and you're adding entries that don't meet our requirements for attestation. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 01:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Half of the definitions you are adding are wrong. With such a low accuracy, maybe you should stick to languages you do know. Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 11:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Does this meet WT:ATTEST? Are you checking whether your entries do? —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 23:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

You should not leave a mess behind like this revision. Don't make entries in languages you don't know how. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 01:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked for a month. Me and some other editors have corrected some of your Ukrainian and Belarusian edits but it's not complete. All you had to do is make some research, validate declensions, etc. but you chose not to. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 02:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Just speedy-deleted the entry 𐌰𐌿𐍂 you created (it is unattested and even when added as a reconstruction, its form would have had to have been *aurs if derived from *auraz). Based on your comments here, I will guess you added this based on another-language Wiktionary edition, such as af.wikt or is.wikt, which have the entry. But other Wiktionaries generally are often quite bad (particularly when it comes to Gothic), so exercise caution, particularly when working with languages you don't know. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 16:31, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi, where are you getting the Tibetan country names from?--Tibidibi (talk) 22:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

I am getting them from the Tibetan Wikipedia. --Numberguy6 (talk) 22:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Also, many of them have already-added translations (that I fill out) and/or entries in other Wiktionaries. --Numberguy6 (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Same question for Gagauz. If you are adding entries in a language you do not claim to know well you should add a reference or a book or journal quotation. Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 01:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please stop making Slavic surname entries. You apparently are clueless about the stress patterns and not making any efforts to verify your edits. this revision is the proof. --121.221.134.95 02:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

In January, I was blocked for one month over the Belarusian/Ukrainian entries I created, and since then, I haven't made any. --Numberguy6 (talk) 02:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello! The word "busìnacu" doesn't exist in Sicilian. The correct word is busnìacu.--86.75.47.151 20:58, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you :) 86.75.47.151 21:27, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey! Thanks for adding those words. I have an odd request - I'm currently on a mountain trip, so it's hard for me to go through them and add anything missing - could you talk them with an rfe or something (rfe would be best) so that way when I can, I can go back and add missing etymologies and such? Thanks Vininn126 (talk) 08:14, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

You should be careful when adding terms from Wikipedia, they sometimes have weird stuff on there. Kleptokracja is attestable, but not very, and I could easily see adding some term that's not actually a thing. This goes for translations, too. Vininn126 (talk) 10:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

You also need to make sure if a term is tantum=s or not. Vininn126 (talk) 10:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Many of the Icelandic entries you added around November 2020 (such as skikkanlegur) are taken word-for-word, meaning-label-for-meaning-label from Forlagið's Icelandic–English Dictionary. This is somewhat of an issue for copyright reasons and these entries would need to be deleted and written anew. Were you working from a set list of words or are you otherwise able to go through your entries and mark the infringing ones for deletion? Hvergi (talk) 19:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Will it still be a copyright issue if I add quotations to the entries? --Numberguy6 (talk) 20:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have edited the entry at skikkanlegur. Is it still a copyright violation? --Numberguy6 (talk) 20:18, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yes it is still a copyright violation when taken verbatim or near-verbatim even with some items added or switched around, not to mention when entries are copied in mass. The only solution would be to delete them and start over. Hvergi (talk) 20:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

If your give me a list of entries that may violate copyright, then I can go through and fix all of them. --Numberguy6 (talk) 03:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

You can't get a weak noun just by specifying the genitive as en, e.g. in Abstinent. You should use the following:

{{de-ndecl|m.weak}}

or similar. Benwing2 (talk) 04:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Numberguy6, you do not speak Icelandic and adding incorrect entries to a dictionary isn't acceptable. Several of your phrase translations were extremely incorrect, and your other entries continue to be either be taken directly from the Icelandic-English dictionary or contain misunderstandings from you translating information from Islex. Hvergi (talk) 11:29, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Hvergi Thank you for correcting me. Note that I took a lot of the phrases that I added directly from wikivoyage:Icelandic phrasebook (which were added by other people), so I recommend that you go through that and correct all of them.

Hello - please don't add Mongolian script entries that you've copied and pasted from Mongolian Wiktionary, as they're often wrong (and often very badly wrong). Most Mongolians who are able to access Wiktionary (i.e. those in Mongolia itself) don't read the script, so we can't just assume they've been written by someone familiar with it.

I have corrected the entry at чиглэх (čiglex) based on two dictionaries I have available to me, but I would strongly advise that you just leave these in future. Theknightwho (talk) 04:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for letting me know. I have added a warning to Template:mn-variant/documentation. Numberguy6 (talk) 04:16, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hey. Please don't add translations in languages you don't know. You seem to be copying Wikipedia titles but that's unfortunately a very bad strategy as anybody can make up anything on Wikipedia, especially the smaller ones. If mass-copying Wikipedia titles into our translation boxes were a net benefit for Wiktionary, we would already have set up a bot to do so. To give you an example where this goes wrong, in this diff you added the German Low German translation Hygromeater (without a gender, mind you). This term is absolutely not attested from what I can see. See WT:TRANS: words added to translation tables are subject to attestation requirements as well. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 12:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey, your declension table at Kavallerist was incorrect. When a masculine noun takes an -en ending for the genitive singular, it will have a weak declension. To specify this, you should use this format:

{{de-ndecl|m.weak}}

Writing "m,en,en" will cause the declension to be wrong in the dative and accusative singular. Megathonic (talk) 07:04, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Heyandwhoa (talk) 02:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ég hef aldrei séð þetta orð á ævinni, fékkstu það úr orðabók eða fann þú upp það? GrænnHundur (talk) 14:27, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@GrænnHundur [1] Numberguy6 (talk) 15:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please do not create dry pages with only one translation when the reference dictionary is full of explanations, and also, do not add unsourced etymologies, direct borrowings from French are not common, they usually come via some other language such as Russian, Polish or German. Наименее Полезное (talk) 10:02, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Numberguy6 Could you please correct the inaccurate translations you added? Наименее Полезное (talk) 13:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for linking eo wiktionary. Could you please add the relevant claims too? Taylor 49 (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't believe those claims are standardized. Numberguy6 (talk) 17:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you claim near-native knowledge of Icelandic but I seriously doubt that. What is your actual knowledge? You messed up the declension of blístur (which I've now corrected), in that it had no contraction when it should. Can you please correct your Babel box to realistically reflect your actual knowledge of Icelandic? Benwing2 (talk) 12:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

That was four years ago, and over the past for years, I have studied the language a lot. I did not have "is-4" until June 2023. Numberguy6 (talk) 16:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

All right I'm skeptical; near-native proficiency is very hard to get. But I will reserve judgment for now. I noticed another botched declension of yours btw, this one from 2022: bólusetning. Benwing2 (talk) 20:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

In addition to technical knowledge of the language, competence is also necessary, I have often seen them adding entries without references. GrænnHundur (talk) 20:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

OK, I found one you created in June 2023 that has the same mistake as bólusetning: bæling (dat and acc singular were all wrong). This is when you claimed near-native proficiency, so either you're not telling the truth or you're very sloppy; either way I would recommend you not create any more Icelandic entries. Note also that I am completely redoing the Icelandic noun declension templates so you would have to learn the new system. Benwing2 (talk) 20:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

It's because I'm sloppy. You can see at nauðung and þynging, which I created in June 2023; I did not make that mistake. Numberguy6 (talk) 21:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

OK, but dictionary editors *CANNOT* be sloppy and continue their work, expecting someone to clean up after them. Sorry. You need to do better or you will end up blocked. Benwing2 (talk) 21:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

hagamús; this from April 2024 and you utterly fucked up the declension. You obviously didn't even bother to preview the declension or you would have seen how messed up it is. PLEASE STOP EDITING ICELANDIC NOW, otherwise I will block you if I see any more sloppiness. Benwing2 (talk) 03:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

hagsmunir; another similar fuckup from March 2024. Benwing2 (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

While that's correct, you should know that this behavior isn't specific to Icelandic entries. I've been criticized for the same reason with many different languages. Numberguy6 (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, that suggests you shouldn't edit ANY language. Really, what's your excuse for being so sloppy? You haven't managed to give any nor shown any indication you will change. I should let you know that people who continually fuck up again and again and seem unlikely to change eventually get permablocked. Benwing2 (talk) 03:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply