T

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I just thought I would discuss the Exempt vs. Immunity in the infobox I don't want this trivial thing to turn into an edit war lol. Last year we used the phrase "Immune from Eviction" when HouseGuests won immunity from an eviction. Exempt is generally used if the Housemate is exempt from the entire process. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 01:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Alreet, as long as it's what it said last year that's good. I just knew that simply "Immune" wasn't right. Change it up! T (Formerly Known as FireSpike) 01:45, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

curious...how do you know who Rachel is putting up for nomination? Thanks for ruining Sunday's show for me!I have already written to CBS to let them know about this! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.26.81.2 (talk) 23:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have already notified CBS about this. I'm sure they would not be happy about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.26.81.2 (talk) 23:21, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:DiamondVeto.xcf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:50, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:DiamondVeto.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:51, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Shockingly quick rvv response on Goatse.cx. Kudos. --Lexein (talk) 01:07, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Haha - Awwww, thanks! I promise I'm not like that. I just hate that people are trying to fight me about his birthday. I'm like, ffs I think I would know his birthday. People are dumb. : ) But thanks for the support!!! <3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Littlexmonster (talk • contribs) 08:47, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

See the version I tagged; I disagreed. Ironholds (talk) 21:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, sorry to see that Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/T isn't going so well. I just wanted to say that, while it doesn't look like it will be successful, I hope you stick around, continue contributing and making yourself useful and maybe consider another RfA in six months or so if you're still interested. In the meantime, feel free to drop by my talk apge if you need anything. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have closed your application as per your request to withdraw. I know it can be a bit discouraging (I also withdrew my first RFA), but you are clearly a valuable user with a bright future should you choose to seize it. extransit (talk) 06:30, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Indeed. I had to withdraw my first RfA, but I passed my second one. It's far from the end of the world. :) As I said above, fell free to drop by my talk page any time. Happy editing, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Act of Leon Trotsky" is nonsensical. This is clearly a mistranslation of "akt" the Polish word for nude. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.204.24.175 (talk) 21:07, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi T, this user is correct. Their edits appear to be vandalism but in fact are constructive edits. –CWenger (talk) 15:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Huh, who knew? Ok, well I guess that was a mistake there. T (talk) 16:04, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:DougHurley.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm teaching a composition course at Pitt that involves researching and writing about Pittsburgh neighborhoods. For one of the students' projects, I'm having them expand existing Pittsburgh Wikipedia stubs. Everyone is new to Wikipedia editing (including myself). We've had some help already from User:Piotrus, but he also suggested I recruit other editors working on Pittsburgh projects to help us. Would you be willing to give us feedback and advice as we move along? Our deadline is 11/22, and I'd love to have feedback for students by 12/6.

My course page is here User:Llh19/pittsburghcityseminar, with links at the bottom to the pages students are editing (6 total).

Let me know if you might be willing to help. Thanks very much for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Llh19 (talk) 01:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Llh19Reply

 

Hello T, this message is being sent on behalf of WikiProject Pittsburgh. You have previously signed up as a member and we are currently trying to determine any members that have become inactive or no longer care to be a member. If you still wish to be on the member list, please sign your name here. Thank you, on behalf of the project, Grsz¹¹ 17:35, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Since you're a member of WikiProject Pittsburgh, I wanted to invite you to the Wikipedia Tenth Anniversary celebrations we're having in Pittsburgh on Saturday, January 15. During the daytime, we're going to be having a photo contribution drive where anyone can bring in their digital photos or prints and Wikipedians will teach people how to upload them and add them to articles, and maybe introduction to Wikipedia workshops as well. Then in the evening, we'll have fun at the Carson City Saloon. There will be free Wikipedia t-shirts and other goodies, as well. See the Pittsburgh meetup page for more details. I hope to see you there!--ragesoss (talk) 14:33, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FunnyJoke.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TARASIA1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:11, 11 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Greetings!

I received your message, indicating that I had defaced the Crazy 8's page. The entry you point to was a correction of a previous name that I had listed mistakenly: 2:50. Getting out the 30 year old 45 record, the name was actually listed as 2minutes50, which I corrected. I'm not sure why this would be considered vandalism?

brucemoreg 'at' yahoo dot com

206.125.72.96 (talk) 07:00, 16 June 2011 (UTC) brucemoreg 'at' yahoo dot comReply

T,

as you probably have guessed, I'm new at adding to wiki!

I'm not sure how I reference things that I have witnessed first hand? The funny thing on this particular page that I was working on references a book/article that I can't find anywhere, and doesn't seem to exist. So, as a reference, if I post a history to my own web page or blog, is this reference considered valid?

btw, I'm also a bit apprehensive to add anything else to this page for fear of being "banned" -- do I need to worry about this?

btw2, I'm trying to track down my account, but can't figure out where the email os going to, to reset my password :-(

Cheers!

206.125.72.96 (talk) 07:00, 16 June 2011 (UTC) brucemoreg 'at' yahoo dot comReply

Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh is rolling out some new features (see our discussion at WT:PITTSBURGH). We are also trying to determine how many members are active. If you could go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh/Members and move your name from inactive to the active or semi-active group (depending on your interest in Pittsburgh issue and overall activity) groups, this would be great. Hopefully in a near future you'll also receive our first newsletter with various information on what we have been doing, and what useful tools are available. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.

You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:59, 30 October 2011 (UTC).Reply

 

The article Steven Daigle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is about a non-notable person. Simply appearing on a reality-TV or game show such as Big Brother, American Idol, Jeopardy, etc. does not make one notable. Notable persons have multiple reliable sources verifying their notoriety, and why they should be included in Wikipedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jsharpminor (talk) 08:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Ian Terry (game designer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --MuZemike 23:26, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:IanTerryBigBrother14.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 23 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, could you edit the America's Funniest Home Videos article. Such as, adding a photo of the new logo and a photo of the set. Thanx. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.130.252.50 (talk) 18:31, 10 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on File:IanTerryBigBrother14.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Cheers, Riley 02:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Jean-Thomas Jobin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Shadowjams (talk) 08:56, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jean-Thomas Jobin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Absurdist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading File:MegaDiningRoom.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your upload of File:BarnstarPitt.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:55, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeopardy! Battle of the Decades, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Syndicated, Wild card and 2000s (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Dude with the Tude who can ruin your weekend. Since you had some involvement with the The Dude with the Tude who can ruin your weekend redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. kelapstick^(bainuu) 13:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ian Terry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Survivor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect To Devour a Predator. Since you had some involvement with the To Devour a Predator redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 01:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Is this a cat in a hat?. Since you had some involvement with the Is this a cat in a hat? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:43, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SurvivorFlags.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TAR11Map.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:ChickenGeorge.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 13:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect To bed, I said. Since you had some involvement with the To bed, I said redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vomit.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Damon's Grill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damon's Grill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Khornloke (talk) 05:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sent by DannyS712 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 08:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sent by User:ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeopardy! Battle of the Decades is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeopardy! Battle of the Decades until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AldezD (talk) 16:26, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kid boy chow. Since you had some involvement with the Kid boy chow redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu57 14:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 10 to 25 people desperate for attention agree to live with each other for 60 to 130 days in order to gain fame or a cash prize. Since you had some involvement with the 10 to 25 people desperate for attention agree to live with each other for 60 to 130 days in order to gain fame or a cash prize redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu57 14:10, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chuckwallis E. Cheese. Since you had some involvement with the Chuckwallis E. Cheese redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu57 14:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jumping box. Since you had some involvement with the Jumping box redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu57 14:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect How Kid boy got his name. Since you had some involvement with the How Kid boy got his name redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu57 14:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Shituation Room. Since you had some involvement with the The Shituation Room redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu57 14:49, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Zoe Dog. Since you had some involvement with the Zoe Dog redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu57 14:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Big Brother's Big Balls, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. gnu57 14:53, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Spongeboob, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. gnu57 14:54, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Might See TV. Since you had some involvement with the Might See TV redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu57 14:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Virgin Screwdriver. Since you had some involvement with the Virgin Screwdriver redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu57 15:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as The Shituation Room, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. gnu57 15:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smash Our Stuff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smash Our Stuff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

StarM 21:12, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello T! I hope you are doing well. I just wanted to let you know that I added you to Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. If you ever come back, or choose not to have your name on this list, just let me know. Hope you come back, even just to check in, Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 21:09, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sock it to me? and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 6#Sock it to me? until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article George Boswell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable reality show contestant; competed on, but did not win, Big Brother.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Oozy rat in a sanitary zoo and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 15#Oozy rat in a sanitary zoo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 00:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:BB12LowRes.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

may be allowed by MOS:TVIMAGE, but inadequately identifies the specific season, despite different background but with the same logo. Also lacks a number within the logo. May likely fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply