Word.Farmer02

Hello, Word.Farmer02, I got your message on my talk page. I have gone ahead and removed the redirect from your sandbox. In the future, all you need to do is navigate to that page (your sandbox) and erase what you find there. Just be careful not to erase the article instead :) Thanks for your contributions! I look forward to your future articles. heather walls (talk) 07:07, 29 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Face lift dentistry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

heather walls (talk) 21:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Word.Farmer02! I went ahead and made a few small changes to your article and accepted it. There are a few notes at the top, one indicates that there are too many links, you could probably remove some of them (things that people already understand, like mouth, and linking the same word repeatedly). Please in the future ask your questions of the friendly hosts at the Teahouse as I tend to have very little free time to answer right away. Happy editing! heather walls (talk) 21:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Spjærøy Church, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 10:32, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot! I really appreciate it. Sorry for the error I did when I mistakenly changed the contents of my Sandbox when I first tried to contribute this new article, which is actually a revised, improved version in English of an article originally in the Norwegian Wikipedia. More new article contributions to come. Best regards to you and to all.Word.Farmer02 (talk) 09:53, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kanban Tool is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanban Tool (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 03:19, 3 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Tyma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Tyma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. St★lwart¹¹¹ 07:37, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've been looking at a bunch of your contributions, one of which I just nominated for deletion and another which is now at WP:FRINGE/N. Were you paid to create the articles you have created? There are about a very disparate range of topics but each seems to have the same problems - promotional language, disingenuous sourcing and major WP:WEIGHT issues. I've worked with paid editors a lot and these are all hallmarks of paid editing. It's worth noting that paid editing isn't prohibited here, but conflict of interest declarations are encouraged and dishonesty and sneaky promotionalism are frowned upon. I'm happy to help and I don't care if that means helping someone to make money (so that we're clear). But the articles you've created are going to be deleted unless you pay attention to how they are created. St★lwart¹¹¹ 07:46, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply