Parsecboy

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 27 May 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Gog! The article should be in good shape. Parsecboy (talk) 23:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

story · music · places

Thank you today for the article, introduced (in 2019): "This is another entry in the series of articles on German battleships - I wrote the article originally in 2010 and then rewrote it with new sources last year"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Gerda! Parsecboy (talk) 09:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Louis Fitzgerald (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 

• Kbdank71
• Kosack
• NrDg
• TLSuda

  Guideline and policy news

• An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.

  Technical news

• The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

  Arbitration

• An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".

  Miscellaneous

• Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.

Hi Parsec, I noticed that you've reviewed an automobile FAC before and I'm wondering if you could possibly leave your comments on this FAC about the Aston Martin DB9? (This is my first nomination). The source and image review have both been passed, so I think that, because this is my first, it will need quite a lot of supports. Thanks and best, and don't feel obliged to,  750h+ | Talk  14:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, sure, I'll find some time to take a look at the article. Parsecboy (talk) 12:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Parsecboy, thanks for the comments, i've addressed those ones. Thanks and best,  750h+ | Talk  05:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Parsecboy:, sorry for the bug, but note that the nomination has four supports! I’ve responded to your concerns, thoughts?  750h+ | Talk  16:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Millennium Eye (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Nyttend

 

• JohnOwens
• Killiondude
• MelanieN
• Nihonjoe

  Bureaucrat changes

  Nihonjoe

 

  CheckUser changes

  Joe Roe

  Oversight changes

  GeneralNotability

  Guideline and policy news

• Phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship review has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including creating a discussion-only period (3b) and administrator elections (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as creating a reminder of civility norms (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the full report.

  Technical news

• Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

  Arbitration

• The arbitration case Conflict of interest management has been closed.

  Miscellaneous

• This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
• A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
• Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 9 May 2024. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!

I would appreciate any positive or negative feedback at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/CSS General Earl Van Dorn. I've taken an ironclad and a tinclad to ACR and FAC and am hoping to get a cottonclad through next. Hog Farm _Talk 02:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey Hog Farm - sure, I'll try to take a look later today. Parsecboy (talk) 10:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited USS Springfield (CL-66), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yorktown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Graham Beards

 

• Deskana
• Mets501
• Staxringold

  Bureaucrat changes

 

• Deskana
• Warofdreams

 

  Oversight changes

  Dreamy Jazz

  Guideline and policy news

• Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.

  Technical news

• The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

  Arbitration

• The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
• The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.

  Miscellaneous

• WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 

• Elli
• HouseBlaster
• Pickersgill-Cunliffe

 

• Brianga
• De728631
• Georgewilliamherbert
• Hyacinth (deceased)
• ProveIt
• The Night Watch

  Technical news

• Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)

  Miscellaneous

• The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SMS Niobe launching.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 22:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SMS Niobe in harbor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 22:52, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gazelle-class cruiser plan, profile, and cross section.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 22:52, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Isabelle Belato

 

• Ian.thomson
• Modussiccandi

  Interface administrator changes

  Izno

 

  CheckUser changes

  Barkeep49

  Technical news

• Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
• Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

  Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ

I have nominated Pre-dreadnought battleship for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 22:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the note, I'll try to lend a hand where I can. Parsecboy (talk) 16:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think I can handle most of this, except for the German stuff. It would be great if you could use a better source than Lenton for them. I'll be working sporadically one this so don't be afraid to dive in if you actually got free time!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I should have no problem with that. As busy as I've been at work lately, I wouldn't expect immediate work from me ;) Parsecboy (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ain't nothing urgent about it. I'm just waiting on the acceptance of my bid by the seller on a new house myself. That's gonna suck up huge amounts of time once I close.

Good luck on the new house! Parsecboy (talk) 14:08, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Your good wishes made the difference. House inspection in a week and then closing in a month with all repair costs coming off the top.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Glad to hear it, though I don't envy you the task of having to move. We've been in our house for 13 years, and I dread the idea of ever having to pack up and move. Parsecboy (talk) 22:09, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the reversion, but DANFS is not necessarily determinative or dispositive, as I and other naval researchers have discovered. And unfortunately, the NHHC no longer has the staff or resources to make corrections (although several of us have volunteered). Mindoro III (CVE-120) was one of the Commencement Bay class of escort carriers - the Navy initially named them after bodies of water, then began naming them for significant WW II battles or invasion sites. In contrast, Mindoro I (1899 gunboat) and her PG/PR sisters were named after America's newest Pacific island possessions (e.g., Luzon, Guam, Wake, Oahu, and probably the most famous, Panay). Most notably, there were no other Commencement Bay carriers named after the lost gunboats, hence my attempt to correct the Wiki page. Drwong64 (talk) 01:40, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I am well aware that DANFS has issues - I've raised a few of them myself over the years to NHHC to have the corrected. My point was more that there is no source provided, but that DANFS, which is cited, doesn't support the change. Parsecboy (talk) 14:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm glad to find another DANFS reader who has run into NHHC's bureaucratic brick wall. Can you revise the reference to cite to the ship's commissioning book then? http://mindoro.atspace.com/page10.htm.

DANFS is similarly inaccurate regarding the naming of Rendova (CVE-114), citing the island itself rather than the landings that took place there in the summer of '43. Thankfully nobody has reposted DANFS's inaccuracy in her Wiki page!  :-)

P.S. Speaking of the Leyte operation, will you be watching the USNI's Leyte commemoration on the 11th? Drwong64 (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you look at the older, printed copies of DANFS, you can see how the error crept into the online version (I have a set of the '76 edition, but you can see it here in the '59 edition as well). Clearly, when it was digitized, the namesake of the first two vessels was simply copied into the third.

I don't love using the commissioning book, since it's self-published and has no publication information (though that's not to say I doubt its accuracy, it just doesn't meet Wiki's sourcing standards). I trawled through Google Books and came up empty-handed there. We might have to just omit the mention of a namesake in the absence of a better source.

I've been following Pocklington's Youtube channel for some time now (amusingly, he started it by running Wiki articles that I and others had written through a voice generator), and had seen his announcement for the panel discussion. It looks like it'll be interesting, but I'll have to watch after the fact. Parsecboy (talk) 12:21, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Drwong64: - I emailed the NHHC when we discussed this on the off chance that they'd get back to me, and as luck would have it, they did! They updated the DANFS page this morning, and I've fixed our article as well. Parsecboy (talk) 15:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hallelujah! That's fantastic news - thanks for following up on this! On a related note, do you want add the cruise book under the "External Links" heading (since it's not authoritative enough to be listed as a "Reference")? Drwong64 (talk) 17:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

That's a good idea - it's still a useful reference for interested readers. Parsecboy (talk) 12:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Pppery

  Interface administrator changes

  Pppery

 

  Oversighter changes

  Wugapodes

  CheckUser changes

 

• Courcelles
• GeneralNotability

  Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.

  Arbitration

• Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
• Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
• The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.

  Miscellaneous

• Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
• A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

story · music · places

Thank you today for SMS Helgoland (1909) introduced (in 2010): "Helgoland was a German battleship built before World War I, the ship saw extensive service throughout the war and played a central role in the Wilhelmshaven mutiny. This article is comprehensive; it includes information from a widely known (at least in the field) diary of a sailor from the ship as well as the recently published book (Feb. 2010) by Gary Staff."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Gerda! Parsecboy (talk) 11:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

My story today features a pic I took from my position in the choir, I can also offer varied delightful music, some from Venice, also with pics I took, - note the rose in the clarinet ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

My older daughter had her instrument fitting last week - she tried the clarinet, but didn't like it as much as the trumpet, which is what she settled on. Though I imagine it will be some time before she produces any sounds that could be classified as delightful, haha! Parsecboy (talk) 16:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 

• Asilvering
• Significa liberdade

 

• Good Olfactory
• Hesperian
• I JethroBT
• TommyBoy
• Woody

  CheckUser changes

 

• Barkeep49
• Izno

 

• Doug Weller
• Spicy

  Guideline and policy news

• Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
• Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.

  Arbitration

• The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
• An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
• Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).

  Miscellaneous

• If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Wespe (1876) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article SMS Wespe (1876) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:SMS Wespe (1876) for comments about the article, and Talk:SMS Wespe (1876)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you have listed this for TFA at pending for November. I have tentatively reserved a date for it, but if you would still like it be considered you will need to nominate it at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests, which is now open. Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey Gog, thanks, I'll do that (but I haven't nominated something there, so I'll have to see if I can remember!) Parsecboy (talk) 19:59, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

My mistake, it was PM. I'll ping them too. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Alright - took me a minute to write up a blurb, but it's been posted. Thanks! Parsecboy (talk) 20:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

• Is there a way to say " The Prinz Adalbert class was an improvement of the earlier armored cruiser Prinz Heinrich, but with improved armament and armor." a little more tightly? Would ' The Prinz Adalbert class was based on the earlier armored cruiser Prinz Heinrich, but with improved armament and armor.' work for you and the sources? Gog the Mild (talk) 21:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Works for me - and looking at that sentence with fresh eyes, it's apparently one I rewrote one times too many! Parsecboy (talk) 22:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Otter (1877) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:45, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Jäger you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:43, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article SMS Jäger you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:SMS Jäger for comments about the article, and Talk:SMS Jäger/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Crocodill (1860) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 17:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I see you've made 150 edits (over 82 percent) to that ironclad warship article we disagreed about, including the first and last. Been through a lot over the last four and a half years, too, getting it to and maintaining it at GA status. Not only do I think this makes you a reasonably unbeatable opponent, but possibly an unbeatable proponent and just the sort to teach modern English readers what a barbette ship's even all about, once and for all. If not, fine. Just think about it. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

That's been on the back burner for a long while now - I wrote a fairly significant chunk of the barbette article (shockingly, it's been a decade since then), and we could probably spin off some of that content to start a fairly basic article (like central battery ship). I'm in the middle of another project right now, but it might be time to move barbette ship up on the priority list. Parsecboy (talk) 14:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

And now we have a blue link. It's just what was in the barbette article, which has been summarized, but it's a start at the very least. Parsecboy (talk) 23:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article SMS Crocodill (1860) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:SMS Crocodill (1860) for comments about the article, and Talk:SMS Crocodill (1860)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:04, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Parsecboy,

My name is Mr. Petersen, and I am new to Wikipedia editing. I'm a big fan of Prinz Eugen and the head chairman of the Prinz Eugen Association.

I recently added information to the Prinz Eugen page and related pages based on materials I have, including a book by Fritz-Otto Busch and various collector items. I noticed you reverted most of the edits, and I’d like to discuss how we can collaborate to ensure the page remains accurate. Much of my information is from sources that are not part of mainstream media but are still credible.

With kind regards,

Mr. Petersen Mr. Petersen (talk) 14:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mr. Petersen. The issue is, we have to write articles based on WP:Reliable sources, so whatever sources you want to include would have to meet the requirements there. Generally, they'd have to be published by a reputable publisher (in other words, not by a vanity press or self-published). Busch's book is cited in the article already - what other sources do you have? Parsecboy (talk) 14:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Parsecboy,

Thank you very much for your thoughtful reply. I appreciate your guidance and I understand. I’ll take some time to gather the additional materials and sources that I have, and I’ll return to you once I have everything ready. I hope that is okay. I look forward to working together to improve the article. Given that Busch's book is already cited in the article, I was wondering why the information about Prinz Eugen being a flagship isn't included, even though Busch clearly states it. Would it be possible to add this specific detail from the book to provide more accuracy to the article?

With kind regards,

Mr. Petersen Mr. Petersen (talk) 15:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't have Busch's book on Prinz Eugen - do you have the specific page number? Parsecboy (talk) 16:26, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Warning: much text:

Busch´s book: page 149 chapter 12, sentence:

“In pursuance of this policy the heavy cruisers Prinz Eugen and Admiral Scheer also received orders and on February 20th, 1942, only seven days after the break-through of the channel, the flotilla left Brunsbüttelkoog for Norway, with Prinz Eugen as flagship with an Admiral, the Commander-in-Chief of battleships, on board”.

While his name is not directly mentioned in the chapter, there's enough written evidence to suggest that the on board Admiral, was Vice-Admiral Ciliax, as they describe his actions and command during the Channel Dash, which Ciliax was in command of.

On page 187 chapter 15, sentence (About Vice-Admiral Thiele):

“The deteriorating situation on all fronts, which worsen steadily month by month, made it seem likely that the vessels in the Admiral's command - Prinz Eugen, Admiral Scheer, Lützow, Schleswig-Holstein, Nürnberg, Leipzig, Köln, Emden, Hansa and, from Autumn 1944, the Admiral Hipper, too - would have to take a hand in the war at sea. The Prinz Eugen was named as flagship should this be so, a fact which gave a great boost to the morale of the ship's company”

Further down the same page

“On the evening of August 18th came the order that the ship should be ready to put to sea at 0700 hours on the 19th. Escorted by five torpedo-boats, the Prinz Eugen sailed with the Vice-Admiral´s flag flying from the foretop.”

Same chapter further ahead on page 193:

“On the morning of October 10th the Prinz Eugen, flying the flag of Vice-Admiral Thiele, the Lützow, three destroyers and four big torpedo-boats put to sea. The group was already known as “Battle Group Thiele”, a name which in the final months of the war achieved some renown.”

On page 199 chapter 16 (just after the collision with Leipzig):

“His arguments were convincing, and every member of the conference realized how terribly important it was that this cruiser, the flagship, should be quickly restored to readiness for action”

On page 210 chapter 18:

“From March 10th-22th the battle group was led by Vice-Admiral Rogge, Vice-Admiral Thiele having taken over another group with the Lützow.”

From there on out, it's implied that Prinz Eugen either kept her flagship status all the way to the surrender in Copenhagen or lost the title just prior to entering Copenhagen.

These are all the places in Busch´s book that more directly talks about Prinz Eugen as a flagship. Mr. Petersen (talk) 18:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I added a mention of being Thiel's flagship, but I'd like to have confirmation that she continued on as Rogge's as well. At some point, I'll get around to incorporating Hildebrand et. al.'s Die Deutschen Kriegsschiffe, and they generally do a good job of tracking command and flagship changes (and Prinz Eugen was a significant ship, so their chapter should be fairly detailed). I'm in the middle of a series of German gunboats (for example SMS Wolf (1878), the current project), but perhaps I'll at least check for Rogge once I'm done there. Parsecboy (talk) 13:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Hi, you've moved Russian yacht Livadia (1880) to Russian yacht Livadia because "unnecessary dab". By that logic you need to move Russian yacht Livadia (1873) to Russian yacht Livadia too. Have fun. DuncanHill (talk) 12:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

You know, you could have just pointed out the other article - your smartass attitude isn't strictly necessary. Perhaps someone should have created an index at at Russian yacht Livadia, which was a red link when I looked this morning. I guess that wasn't fun enough.

Sorry, I was trying to be lighthearted. Next time I'll just suggest you read the first sentence of an article before moving it. DuncanHill (talk) 16:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your move of an article to Russian corvette Vityaz is incorrect. There was another corvette named Vityaz launched in 1884. Please move the article back to its correct title. Mjroots (talk) 11:11, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

That someone may someday create that article is no reason to disambiguate the one we have now. Preemptive disambiguation causes problems when people forget to create a redirect or index at the base name (which is what happened in this case and the one above - and if there is only one article currently, it causes a disservice to readers who land on the index first, and then have to click to reach the only actual piece of content we have). If we eventually have an article on that ship, we can cross that bridge when we get to it (and there's an argument that only 2 articles don't require an index - compare SMS Moltke and SMS Moltke (1877); the former is the primary topic, and disambiguation can be resolved by hatnotes). Parsecboy (talk) 12:06, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article SMS Otter (1877) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:SMS Otter (1877) for comments about the article, and Talk:SMS Otter (1877)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:22, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Fuchs you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 03:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 19 December 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/December 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 00:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article SMS Fuchs you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:SMS Fuchs for comments about the article, and Talk:SMS Fuchs/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 20:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

 

  Administrator changes

 

• Crisco 1492

 

• Babajobu
• Daniel
• Elf
• Jayron32
• Thue
• Wugapodes

  CheckUser changes

  Maxim

  Oversighter changes

  Maxim

  Guideline and policy news

• Following a discussion, the discussion-only period proposal that went for a trial to refine the requests for adminship (RfA) process has been discontinued.
• Following a request for comment, Administrator recall is adopted as a policy.

  Technical news

• Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

  Arbitration

• RoySmith, Barkeep49 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2024 Arbitration Committee Elections. ThadeusOfNazereth and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
• Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections.
• The Arbitration Committee is seeking volunteers for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.

  Miscellaneous

• An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

Hi, Parsecboy. I'm just posting to let you know that List of battleships of Japan – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for December 2. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Where did you get that image? — Ирука¹³ 19:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

It was originally on Commons (and apparently since deleted) - hence why it has "local" in the file name. Parsecboy (talk) 19:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Reply

Hi, maybe noteworthy to add a footnote on Paschen? Paschen was executed by the Nazis on grounds of defeatism. Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 14:59, 15 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey MB, good to hear from you! I think it's probably beyond the scope of the Lützow article, but I wonder if Paschen is notable enough for his own article. It seems he developed the German counterpart to the dumaresq, and wrote a significant German account of Jutland, so while he doesn't appear to have reached flag rank, he may still be notable. Parsecboy (talk) 15:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

He has a German article, see de:Günther Paschen. I saw a documentary on him. Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Interesting - I have very long range plans to tackle more German naval officers (I've only done a handful so far, and it'd require tracking down a set of Hildebrand's Deutschlands Admirale) and that would be a good one to add to the list. Parsecboy (talk) 13:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Viper you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:41, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

story · music · places

Thank you today for SMS Friedrich Carl another German armored cruiser built in the early 1900s that was mined and sunk in the early months of World War I, though most of the crew was evacuated by other ships. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Gerda! Parsecboy (talk) 11:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Parsecboy, I noticed that you were the one who added the light cruiser numbers to the Plan Z page I'd just like to know where you got the number from as from what I can see there were only 6 M-Class cruisers planned and Germany only had 6 light cruisers at the time so 12 seems more accurate to me but, I've also found wildly different numbers other places. So If you could just link where you found it whenever you can that would be great. Also please don't interpret this as passive aggressiveness or doubt I just can't find the information anywhere else. Thanks in advance. ARealHumanPersonGuy (talk) 13:12, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The table comes from Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1922–1946 - the page number is cited here. Parsecboy (talk) 13:13, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I believe this may be a typo, under where ship numbers are listed it states that "It must be pointed out that German sources and books differ surprisingly in the figures for the 'Z-Plan'; the figures given here are based on the projects quoted in this book." but then under the cruisers section (specifically light cruisers) starting on page 229 it only mentions 12 ships the Emden, Konigsberg, Karlsruhe, Koln, Leipzig, Nurnberg, and the six M-Class cruisers. I see no later mention of light cruisers excluding the scout cruisers which leads me to believe this is human error by one of the books authors. I would also like to say that based on the first part of the quote and other information I've seen the plan may have called for either 23 or 44 ships depending on the iteration I have no definitive source for this idea but it is something to consider for further research. Also to be completely honest 13 light cruisers seems like an exceptionally small amount compared to the large number of destroyers. ARealHumanPersonGuy (talk) 14:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article SMS Hay (1860) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SMS Hay (1860) and Talk:SMS Hay (1860)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 14:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hoi Parsecboy, I noticed your comment on moving the firecontrol text to the Bismarck-class and that's fair enough to me, but would the Characteristics chapter not be better balanced if there would be one line each, to document the presence of the surface and anti-aircraft fire control at least ? Now this chapter mentions about a ship's newspaper that was printed just one time, and about the transfer of 600 mans from Karlsruhe; that seems less relevant to me than the fire control.

Kind regards, Klutserke (talk) 21:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

You have a point that the rangefinders should probably at least be mentioned - I'll put something back. I also don't think the crew paragraph is ideal - probably the stuff about each division should be in the class as well. Parsecboy (talk) 10:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article SMS Hay (1860) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:SMS Hay (1860) for comments about the article, and Talk:SMS Hay (1860)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 20:24, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article SMS Viper you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:SMS Viper for comments about the article, and Talk:SMS Viper/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SMS Brummer (1884) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article SMS Brummer (1884) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:SMS Brummer (1884) for comments about the article, and Talk:SMS Brummer (1884)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 17:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hoi Parsecboy, I'm coming often across expressions like "They were mounted in six Dop. L. C/31 twin mounts amidships". Dop. L. is not a typification like "Mark VII" or so, it is the abbreviation of DoppelLafette, so twin mount. Hence the same thing is mentioned twice, just in different languages. Is this fine or should it be addressed, like changing it in: "They were mounted in six twin mounts ( German:Doppellafette, abbreviated Dop. L.) amidships" ?

Kind Regards, Klutserke (talk) 22:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Klutserke - I'm guessing you're referring to the Scharnhorst-class battleship article. When I wrote that some 15 years ago, I assumed it was part of the designation (since the Navweaps source I used seems to [still] indicate that it is). I think it'd be easier to just cut the abbreviation, since it's not especially relevant to the ship page, but it probably should be mentioned on the 10.5 cm Flak 38 page, which is a bit thin on details. Parsecboy (talk) 00:34, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply