Shorn again

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mistle thrush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jethro Tull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 8 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

With regard to your deletion of a perfectly acceptable compromise, I looked up the reference to which you directed me and modified the WP article accordingly. If you had any responsible editorial curiosity about a musician with an obviously foreign name, you could have done that yourself. Sweetpool50 (talk) 09:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have been busy working on the article on Damien Lovelock so have not had time to comment on the change you want to make to the description of Mangeot in the Isherwood article. First of all, in an article about Isherwood, the main focus ought to be on him, so a link to Mangeot's article is sufficient. There's a Manual of Style article that covers this sort of thing. On the other hand, he has a foreign name so a brief qualifier such as "naturalised musician" could be in order. I would have preferred simply "the musician". Calling Mangeot a "French-born English musician" draws away the attention, in my view, and can give a wrong impression. Damien Lovelock, for example, could be described as "an English-born Australian singer", and be true to the facts, except that insisting on the accident of his birth in England would give the wrong impression in that case. His parents retained their Australian citizenship and Damien was brought up in Australia from age 1 - his nearest English relations were four generations back. The Grove description of Mangeot as an English musician is their ambiguous shorthand for saying that his working life was passed in England. But what they say under the constraints of space does not need to be used to give a wrong impression on WP. Mangeot was born in France, had his musical education in one of the most impressive French institutions, called his second son by a French name and spoke French in the household (as well as to Isherwood). Calling him English could therefore give the misleading impression that he was taken to England as a child. That's my impression as a working editor, anyway.

I can perhaps suggest a pointer for furthering your interest in André Mangeot the writer. You could take a look at Ancestors Net or FindMyPast; certain families also have an online presence maintained by researchers that give a lot of information. My guess would be that the writer might be a grandson of the musician via either Fowke or Sylvain. Seren Books describes André2 as being "from an Anglo-French family", so if he is in the direct line that's a clue to how they think of themselves. Further back in time, the literary Maturins are described as coming from a family of Huguenot descent, although the connection (like that of Damien Lovelock with his forebears) goes back a long way. Sweetpool50 (talk) 04:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate your more detailed thoughts and constructive tone. Let's review further as needed regarding the Isherwood article on the talk page there for broader visibility - perhaps the language used by the younger André and some different phrasing or structure could suggest a way forward. Shorn again (talk) 01:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

By all means use me as a sounding board for your ideas. In reality, I find Isherwood a rather unsatisfying author. My intervention in his article was chiefly because editors were tending to take his Lions and Shadows as more autobiographical than it was meant to be! Sweetpool50 (talk) 09:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Weasel words, lack of NPOV, etc. on article: Gab (social network). The discussion is about the topic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gab_(social_network). Thank you. --~~~~ Commandur (talk) 19:09, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading File:Fantome-logo.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply