Nirmaljoshi

Welcome, welcome, welcome Nirmaljoshi! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:53, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Tigers in Nepal indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for notifying. One user had blanked the article Gaver Tigers for no particular reason. I have restored the article and added few more article for this category. Best! nirmal (talk) 10:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Chariotrider555 (talk) 21:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Chariotrider555: You should make habit of reading them in the first place. And also you should read what is written in your source properly. Happy editing! nirmal (talk) 01:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for contributing to the article Kans Quila. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies on reliable sources (especially for history). Please remember to review the changes and edit summaries being made and the reason for which content is added or removed before simply reverting edits. Chariotrider555 (talk) 21:48, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Nirmaljoshi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of longest running hydroelectric power plants, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Glacier lake outburst flood indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@LizI re-added one article. It was removed by some editor. This is a resonable category to have. Best! nirmal (talk) 01:29, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Takoutaue-ike Dam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takoutaue-ike Dam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BryceM2001 (talk) 17:55, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply