MarkR06

There's no need to note that all episodes exist; it's a given. If there are episodes missing, we do note that in the appropriate sections below. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 14:45, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please stop changing back the links for the Fifth and Tenth Doctor. We can't have two similair looking links to two different articles. — Edokter • Talk • 22:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Roy Stewart, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.    SIS  22:52, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Five Doctors. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. You have been asked by more than one editor to discuss on the talk page your constant reversions. If you continue to rvt without discussion you may be blocked for edit warring. MarnetteD | Talk 23:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Declan Napier. Thank you. --Ged UK (talk) 19:42, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to List of Doctor Who serials, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Maccy69 (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Maccy69 (talk) 19:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi there!

I have recently nominated Neighbours for Wikipedia:Good articles status. I'm just wondering if you would be interested in working with me to bring the article up to good article status and help me ensure that it remains there by meeting the Wikipedia:Good article criteria?

No reason why it can't be a good article! You are a frequent contributor to the page and your contributions are always valued which is why I thought I'd ask you --5 albert square (talk) 14:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! Neighbours is currently being reviewed for good article status. You will find the reviewers comments (once he's added them) on the appropriate link at Talk: Neighbours. Please contribute in any way that you can to get Neighbours up to good article status. Any questions ask me on my talk page --5 albert square (talk) 01:35, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello MarkR06. Thanks for your editing efforts. Please be aware that there is a longstanding consensus that credits in the Doctor Who infoboxes are as seen onscreen. The words "Voice of" are not used in the credits for the actors who voiced K9. Please stop adding it to various Doctor Who articles. Your help in this will be appreciated. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD | Talk 17:41, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. That's why I changed them as every on-screen end credit for K-9 reads "Voice of K9" followed by John Leeson or David Brierley.... MarkR06 (talk) 18:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

10,000 apologies. You are correct. That is what I get for not checking the DVDs first. I have fixed the entries that I reverted thru Shada but I thought that I would let you continue making the changes thru Warriors Gate - and K9 & Co and the Five Drs. I have not checked the DVDs for the new series or The Sarah Jane Adventures but if they continued using the "Voice of" in those credits then you should add it to the episodes that have included K9 also. Thank you for being more thorough than I was and again 100,000 (I thought that I would add 90,000 since you deserve them) apologies. Cheers and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 23:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are forgiven :-) I have changed the remaining ones. I don't watch Sarah Jane Adventures so I'm not sure but I'm guessing it's still 'Voice of' like "School Reunion" etc in the new Doctor Who series have him listed as.... MarkR06 (talk) 21:01, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your understanding. On a different note I saw your edit to The Five Doctors and I wanted to fill you in on something in case my edit summary was too brief. You altered the credits to put them in the order as seen onscreen. I used to do that too. It turns out that, per the instructions as seen on the page for this Template:Infobox Doctor Who episode, that multi-Doctor episodes are handled differently than regular stories. Thus, I have changed it back. Have a great rest of your week. MarnetteD | Talk 21:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

OK if you prefer it that way. I've altered 'The Three Doctors' to be in the same style.... MarkR06 (talk) 22:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Good catch. I hadn't taken the time to check that article so I'm glad that you got there first. MarnetteD | Talk 22:23, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello Mark

Please note that the Neighbours character pages do not have episode numbers attached to their first and last appearance dates. Please stop adding these, thanks in advance for your co-operation.--5 albert square (talk) 22:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi

The Home and Away page does. I don't see why the Neighbours one shouldn't really as long as it's accurate.... MarkR06 (talk) 22:05, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Malcolm has not departed yet. Please do not add false information to his article or remove him from the cast list until he does leave. - JuneGloom Talk 17:42, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Neighbours does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! - JuneGloom Talk 13:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of soap opera villains, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - JuneGloom Talk 18:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Doctor Who vehicles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Inferno and The Three Doctors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sixth Doctor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Doctor in Time and the Rani, but it is misleading to say he "plays" the Sixth Doctor-->)<br/> ''[[Dimensions In Time]]'' (charity special)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm 5 albert square. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Toadfish Rebecchi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 13:04, 7 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Armitage (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Llewellyn. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jackie Woodburne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Fletcher.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bonnie Langford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Masked Dancer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm DarkGlow. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Alexandra Mardell, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! – DarkGlow • 07:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Meena. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Millie Gibson, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! – Meena • 22:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Family Fortunes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andy Collins.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Neighbours, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – JuneGloom07 Talk 18:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Seriously? You literally just read the news and still couldn't be bothered to add it as a source. The burden is on you to add a source when you add/change information. Please start adding references where possible. You also failed to provide an edit summary, which is helpful to other editors, so they can see what changes were made. - JuneGloom07 Talk 18:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply