[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Valene Ewing

edit

Hi, HorrorFan121, I'm beginning the copy-edit to the above article that you requested at the GOCE request page. Please feel free to contact me, correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. I'm sorry you've had to wait a while for the copy-edit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:22, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Done - feel free to contact me about any ongoing issues with the copy-edit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Here Comes Honey Boo Boo.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Here Comes Honey Boo Boo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 03:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Rachel Berry

edit

How are you doing? Long time no see, at least on the Glee articles.

I was wondering what you were planning to do with Rachel's article. At the moment, leaving it with a "Season 2-3" heading just isn't acceptable, along with a complete elimination of the events of Season 3. If you're planning on straightening this out in the next hour or so, I'll leave it, but if not, I'm going to revert so it at least has some recent events and no odd combination of seasons ... assuming someone else doesn't beat me to it. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:56, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hey! I was going to do some work on the article when I got a chance. Last night I was just doing "band-aid" work on it. It's fine that you reverted. I'll add some sources for those later. Hope you're doing good! :) HorrorFan121 (talk) 19:15, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Rebecca Sutter

edit

Hello there - Just to make you aware. I will be redirecting the article mistitled Rebecca Barnes in one weeks time if no improvement has been made. As you may know I have expressed my disappoint with Dallas related articles in the past. I will not accept these incomplete articles anymore - nor will the general community. As for the GA articles such as Sue Ellen - they need to be reassessed because 99.9% of the information available is not included in the article. As you know, I have been aware of the situation since (well before) June 2012 - to let it continue into 2013 would be unfair on the general reader.Rain the 1 02:40, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have just noticed that you did the same with Elena Ramos. You stated that you would do more work on the article "later". Maybe working in a sandbox is a better option - that way you will not leave incomlete articles behind. It is great that you have bothered to make a start on the articles and try to improve them - they just need the final push in the right direction.Rain the 1 18:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. The articles have amazing potential given all the publicity the show has received in the last couple of years, particularly for the main three (J.R., Sue Ellen, and Bobby). Unfortunately, I just haven't been able to find the time to put the necessary work into them due to my personal life taking away from my editing. Feel free to redirect Rebecca Barnes. HorrorFan121 (talk) 19:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
I did hope you would be motivated to complete them. I did not want you to retire. I hope you do return some time and contribute again. Bye for now and good luck.Rain the 1 20:29, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
No, it wasn't you. I think it's a combination of things, mainly my lack of time to edit. Plus, I've been putting off many major edits for some time. I don't think it's right to make promises that I can't hold (at least for now). Like you said, it's been a couple of months since we discussed changes to Sue Ellen Ewing, but I just haven't been able to really sit down and edit. But, who knows? I'm a spur of the moment person and those sources that you brought to my attention will always be available on the talk page. The urge to complete them might come to me someday. Would you consider Pamela Barnes in good shape? HorrorFan121 (talk) 22:55, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Happy New Year! I think Pamela's article is certainly better than the Sue Ellen article. Sometimes there is an overuse of quotes. But not to worry. We can find more sources in the future for all of the characters. I would quite like to work on the show's articles - buut I would probably need some help. So you'll have to let me know when you are free again. I just created an article for a Dallas character. Meet Marta Del Sol.Rain the 1 01:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Victoriaprincipal.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Victoriaprincipal.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit
File Copyright problem 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Princessdi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:55, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Not sure if you're active still, but we received an email from the Reagan Library stating that this image did not originate with them. If you can provide a valid source and use rationale then great, otherwise it will have to be deleted since we have no idea where it truly came from and who holds the copyright. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:59, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Just to let you know, this file is under discussion at wikimedia commons. DrKiernan (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Victoria Principal as Pamela Ewing.jpg

edit
⚠ 

Thanks for uploading File:Victoria Principal as Pamela Ewing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Laura spencer horton a history 1 laura tom 230x160.jpg

edit
⚠ 

Thanks for uploading File:Laura spencer horton a history 1 laura tom 230x160.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:United states of tara.png

edit
⚠ 

Thanks for uploading File:United states of tara.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:18, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:WillSchuester.JPG

edit
⚠ 

Thanks for uploading File:WillSchuester.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Emmapillsbury.JPG

edit
⚠ 

Thanks for uploading File:Emmapillsbury.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Terrischuester.jpg

edit
⚠ 

Thanks for uploading File:Terrischuester.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply