Hoponpop69

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Gerbilling, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sorry for the generic template for newbies, but it was a newbie move you made.Asher196 (talk) 17:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

It was not a newbie move. The source intact referenced my edit, the article was even titled "From Gere to Eternity" and specifically mentions Richard Gere.Hoponpop69 (talk) 17:52, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Can we please not do that? Per WP:BLP1E it is unlikely to stay. Prodego ^talk 08:08, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why? This version is sourced, contains information that isn't in the shooting article, and resembles a biography of a living person rather than a stub.Hoponpop69 (talk) 08:12, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I think it's different when the AP says, flat out that Loughner is "an ardent atheist" and the Guardian says he is "a vigorous atheist". Neither reporter is quoting JLL's classmates. Isn't this why we rely on "reliable sources" -- at some point a statement becomes more of a fact and less of an opinion? If you see what I mean. --Kenatipo (talk) 19:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

That's fine, then just merge that info and source into the current sentence instead of having the article with two similar sentences back to back.Hoponpop69 (talk) 19:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

As I indicated in the edit summary, I think the quote you inserted regarding Loughner's mental state may violate WP:BLP policy. Could you discuss this on the article talk page? I've started a section for this. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

On 27 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jared Lee Loughner, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Jared Lee Loughner was detained at the Federal Correctional Institution at Phoenix after the 2011 Tucson shooting? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 06:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've already asked you not to re-add speedy tags once a speedy has already been declined. I'm not sure if you realize that your persistence with this might start to come across as disruptive. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 17:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are receving this because your user name is listed in Category:WikiProject Punk music members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile and move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list.
Cheers

--Guerillero | My Talk 01:57, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Mikey Erg. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I noticed your edit to Hardcore punk, specifically at the section "Influence on other genres." Removing referenced information, particularly an entire referenced section of a page, can be considered vandalism.

You commented that "it has nothing to do with anything relating to this article." If you truly feel that way, than discuss it at Talk:Hardcore punk. However, information about the fusion of hardcore punk subgenres and electronic music could not be in a better location. The section "Influence on other genres" appropriately contains information about the fusion of hardcore punk and a variety of other genres. Best wishes and happy editing :o) --♫ Chris-B-Koolio ♫ ... (Talk) 17:39, 30 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, several of your edits on the hardcore page were marked as minor and had no rationale, but these edits were in fact removing bands from the page. According WP:VANDTYPES, marking non-minor edits as minor can be seen as gaming the system and a type of vandalism. I am sure that you meant no ill intent, but please refrain from doing this in the future. Thanks,--3family6 (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

It would be good to use a small amount of common sense with the discography section of the AC/DC article. The non-Australian release of High Voltage was not at any point issued or marketed as a compilation, and in terms of almost the entire world, it was unreleased material. I assume you are not saying that High Voltage and Iron Man 2 are essentially the same type of album. High Voltage was the first release outside Australia, and to omit it from a discography is misleading and confusing. Nobody's saying we should add Greatest Hits albums, which is what those small discography sections are supposed to omit. If anything, the two Australian albums should be set aside from the rest, with a proper international discography underneath - that would be the sensible route to take. Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:33, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I am using common sense, it doesn't matter if it wasn't available in most of the world, it is still old material being reissued, and not a studio album. If you look at other pages discography sections, like The Clash, you don't see the distinct U.S. and U.K. versions of their first album listed.Hoponpop69 (talk) 00:55, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, in that case, obviously - the thing to do is to remove the local issues. I see you just edit war in lieu of a proper discussion. You are wrong, but it's just a case of "I'm right, and the page 'will reflect my views". Top editing. Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have started a discussion at Talk:AC/DC#High Voltage in discography section, where a consensus can be established. Your analogy of The Clash is not really the same issue, and your claim that "it doesn't matter if it wasn't available in most of the world" appears to be unsubstantiated. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:02, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Will you stop edit-warring? I left the discography section at your preferred version to avoid an edit war which you were intent on continuing, and started a discussion. Then you start another edit war at the lead section, over the pettiest thing. Start a discussion if you don't like something, per the guidelines. Bretonbanquet (talk) 10:12, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry, but I just don't see how that at all can be considered a controversial edit. It's simple common sense, to either list all the dates or none of them, as it is currently completely inconsistent. It seems like you are picking on me, and just trying to goad me by reverting non-controversial edits. I find it hard to believe that you honestly think the version listing two exact dates, and years for all the rest, better than a consistent version.Hoponpop69 (talk) 17:53, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

So you keep doing it... read WP:3RR. You keep reverting to your version, away from the established version, despite the fact there's a discussion going on? Anyway, what are you even talking about - "all the rest"? Only three albums have a release date mentioned, and two have the full date - the first and the last. I'm picking on you? When you edit-war against me and others on a daily basis over trivial matters? I'll tell you what's non-controversial, and that's having a full release date for a couple of albums in the lead. I don't care one bit what you find hard to believe. You need to try engaging in discussion instead of reverting to whatever version you like best, not doing both. Bretonbanquet (talk) 18:28, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please file a complaint. You have openly admitted that you refuse to discuss this issue, and it's clear from this page that I have tried quite hard to get you to discuss this properly. Take it to whatever admin page you want. Bretonbanquet (talk) 13:51, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, the page is now protected. It would be worth us discussing the matter sensibly, either here or at the article's talk page, so that there's no recurring problem when the protection expires. Don't assume I'm harassing you - I have no issue with any of your edits apart from this one, and the High Voltage issue which was resolved in the proper manner. Bretonbanquet (talk) 15:55, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

And I will now be reporting you for harassing me.Hoponpop69 (talk) 19:49, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on AC/DC. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

A report has been made here [1] Mlpearc powwow 14:50, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Read the protecting admin's edit summary. Consensus was reached. And consensus does not mean a simple majority (although in this case, the majority does favour not including this info. Read the talk page. It's pretty clear. freshacconci talktalk 16:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Ina Garten. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:30, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Dog Eat Dog (band), as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Removal of content of any kind does not constitute a minor change.

Check this out before making incorrect statements. And please don't disrupt a good article. Thanks. Scieberking (talk) 22:22, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Is four people agreeing enough for a consensus?Hoponpop69 (talk) 03:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Can you find no better source than Fox etc? Some quality broadsheet newspaper, for example? I realise that it is subjective but if you had something from, say, The Times then you would have a far better chance of the project retaining the statement. Personally, I do not give a fig about the Kardashians but the heat there is ridiculous in part because of the nature of the sources that are used. - Sitush (talk) 02:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Added a source from the New York Times.Hoponpop69 (talk) 03:30, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

You have done it again, Look, please read WP:BLP and stop adding stuff that is sourced to gossip-type columns in newspapers etc. It is not acceptable. Does this again and I may seek an administrator's review of what is going on because you clearly do not have consensus. - Sitush (talk) 14:20, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kim Kardashian. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 14:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I am unsure what your issue is with Kim Kardashian but you really are warring against several people now. Why not take it to the talk page and try to get some consensus? - Sitush (talk) 01:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited La Plebe (band), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mick Jones and Ensenada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I noticed you made an edit to the article List of television series notable for negative reception, removing a bunch of "unsourced" edits. I appreciate the help, but in the process you took out a bunch of ones that were indeed sourced, although in the text (e.g. names of book and author, ranking on already-cited lists) and not with a traditional citation or <ref> tag. I reverted the article back to the one before your edit, not out of spite or vandalism, but to restore the erroneous removals. Over the course of tomorrow, I'll weed out the ones that are truly unsourced (and there are quite a few in there that do need to be removed, either for lack of sources or for merely being mediocre and not among the worst or most poorly received, which was what the point of that article is supposed to be). So please don't take offense! J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 03:38, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello Hoponpop69. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Futureproof (album), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Band article is kept - A9 cannot apply. (applies to all other albums as well). Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 20:15, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by In actu (Guerillero) on behalf of WikiProject Punk. You are receiving this because your user name is listed in Category:WikiProject Punk music members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile, remove the category from your profile, and/or move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list. Thanks.

 16:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Tim Mathern, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fargo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Falling in Reverse, you may be blocked from editing. Refrain from making edits such as this [[2]] where you remove information, updated images, and past members from the article. Thank you. TJD2 (talk) 18:56, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

My bad, that was an accident. I meant to just restore the sources that were removed.Hoponpop69 (talk) 01:08, 22 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by In actu (Guerillero) on behalf of WikiProject Punk. You are receiving this because your user name is listed in Category:WikiProject Punk music members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile, remove the category from your profile, and/or move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list. Thanks.

Cheers,

benzband (talk) & Guerillero | My Talk 06:30, 24 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited A Million in Prizes: The Anthology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I'll Be Seeing You (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please restore the mothers section and merge it into the couples section. Why was 'Henry and Anna Crocker' removed? A lack of evidence? 174.22.15.55 (talk) 06:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Delivered by In actu (Guerillero) on behalf of WikiProject Punk. You are receiving this because your user name is listed in Category:WikiProject Punk music members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile, remove the category from your profile, and/or move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list. Thanks.

Cheers,

benzband (talk) & Guerillero | My Talk 00:30, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrick Murphy (Florida politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Delivered by In actu (Guerillero) on behalf of WikiProject Punk. You are receiving this because your user name is listed in Category:WikiProject Punk music members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile, remove the category from your profile, and/or move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list. Thanks.

Cheers,

benzband (talk) & Guerillero | My Talk 22:08, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Out of print, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Youth Brigade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:21, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marty Walsh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dorchester (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baseball color line, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Smith and Jose Santiago (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arthur W. Coolidge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Bradford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Hoponpop69,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Sound & Fury (1982 album) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound & Fury (1982 album) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:01, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Blizzard of 78 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cn

The Young Adults (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Hoponpop69. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Broadside Electric, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article was the subject of a previous AFD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadside Electric) and not eligible for CSD. Thank you. Mkdw^talk 21:49, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oakland Athletics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bash Brothers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Screeching Weasel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prospect Heights (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big D and the Kids Table, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devil Doll (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Robert Kelly (comedian) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• in Baghdad. Kelly claimed on the ''Opie and Anthony Show'', that while there he saw a werewolf.{

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:56, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of WikiProject Punk. You are receiving this because your user name is listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Punk music/Zine/Recipients (if you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove your name from the page). Thanks.

Cheers,

benzband (talk) & Guerillero | My Talk 04:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Offspring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page D.I. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:13, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

This user helped promote Blink-182 to good article status.

Well done. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 11:02, 19 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aberdeen, Washington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Freeman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christy Darlington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trinity Christian Academy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 23 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tooth & Nail Records. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christy Darlington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heritage Christian Academy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ryan Seaman, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fairview and Gob (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Damned (band), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Music for Pleasure and Brian James (musician). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mass Giorgini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Man Army. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 27 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to In My Head (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• citation needed|date=April 2013|reason = |Spray Paint the Walls by Stevie Chick Page 374-375 = }} } It was released in 1985 on [[SST Records]], and was their final album before their reunion in 2013.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sharpies (Australian subculture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Femme. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ramones Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Youth Brigade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Was there any discussion or consensus about this move or did you act unilaterally? Just curious. - CompliantDrone (talk) 01:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

I acted unilaterally, as the article had a single sentence worth of sourced content.Hoponpop69 (talk) 05:37, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Kerry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopalian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moshpit Tragedy Records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Virus (band). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frequency Deleted Records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revenge (band). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Channel 3 (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cerritos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Hoponpop69. Regarding a deletion like this one you made, I ask that you keep WP:Preserve in mind. Even preserving such content on the talk page, noting why you removed the material, is preserving it. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Opie with Jim Norton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Norton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I've started a discussion on the Talk page for Discordianism to discuss the massive amount of content removed as being unsourced. Please participate in the discussion to help us come to a consensus. -Osho-jabbe (talk) 19:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Screechingweaselalbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Screechingweaselmybrainhurts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bad Religion may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Bad Religion Cover) |publisher=ThePunkSite.com |date= |accessdate=2013-02-19}}</ref> [Frank Turner]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.punknews.org/article/39998/frank-turner-my-poor-friend-me-bad-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:59, 8 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Untitled 21: A Juvenile Tribute to the Swingin' Utters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since January 2011.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:29, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Htmeaip.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Raw (Sex Pistols album - cover art).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:08, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bo Diddley beat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Not Fade Away. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately, this was an undesirable change in a number of respects, and the way you did it (unilaterally without any prior consultation of any kind, as far as I can discover) made it highly inappropriate. If you want this merger to go through, then start the process rolling in the proper manner -- by adding the correct templates to the tops of the articles involved, stating your reasons for the merger on the suitable article talk page, and waiting for favorable and/or unfavorable discussion to occur. AnonMoos (talk) 12:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

The purpose of tags such as "citation needed" is to single out passages which are in need of special attention. If you automatically add tags to the end of every paragraph, then you aren't accomplishing anything too meaningful, since tagging everything without distinction is functionally the same as tagging nothing... AnonMoos (talk) 12:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

As I told you before directly above, indiscriminately adding tags to the end of every paragraph or sentence is really rather useless, since it goes against the basic purpose of such tags, which is TO SINGLE OUT PARTICULAR PASSAGES IN NEED OF SPECIAL ATTENTION. Indiscriminate "pockmarking" tagging really accomplishes very little except to annoy other people... AnonMoos (talk) 00:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Then use sources. If you don't want people to ask for sources don't have unsourced content.Hoponpop69 (talk) 15:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

"Citation needed" tags are to be used on Wikipedia with common sense and to serve a useful purpose (and not whatever you're trying to use them for). Basically all of the assertions that you've been pointlessly tagging up can be found on http://www.principiadiscordia.com/book/41.php , which is the very first link given on the page! The URL http://www.principiadiscordia.com/book/41.php is not going to be linked at the end of every single sentence, because that's not the way Wikipedia works. If there's something significant in the article which is not supported by http://www.principiadiscordia.com/book/41.php or any other provided reference, then it's OK to add a specific "citation needed" tag with discretion. What's not OK is to go on a meaningless indiscriminate pockmarking rampage... AnonMoos (talk) 15:09, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Then use sources. If you don't want people to ask for sources don't have unsourced content.Hoponpop69 (talk) 03:44, 25 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

If you do not wish to see this article reverted to a redirect I would concentrate on finding sources establishing notability. rather then making cosmetic changesSlatersteven (talk) 15:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Black Republican. Since you had some involvement with the Black Republican redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bob Dole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Anderson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello Hoponpop69. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Spitshine Records, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: claims coverage in a book, releases by notable band. Thank you. SOWHY 09:11, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hardline Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Redfield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lost Gems & Rare Tracks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Freeman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

The Dopamines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Stephen Egerton

The Prozacs (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Guts

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 7 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

JFK (disambiguation) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dorchester

List of memorials to John F. Kennedy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dorchester

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:4trib-vindicitives-leavehome.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:05, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Out of Print (Youth Brigade album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out of Print (Youth Brigade album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:59, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry Shearer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BMG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rufus Gifford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hiding Place (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello Hoponpop69. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Roaring Jack, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: having a notable member indicates signficance. Thank you. SoWhy 10:16, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello Hoponpop69. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Prodigals, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: having a notable member indicates significance. Thank you. SoWhy 10:16, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Perry Caravello, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Prison camp and The Adam Carolla Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I reverted your a7 tag of the above article. The tag was completely meritless. I strongly urge you not to tag any articles as you obviously don't know what you're doing. If I see you do it again, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:13, 25 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your wisdom and revert, but I'll be ignoring your rudely worded advice and be tagging whatever I want, whenever I want.Hoponpop69 (talk) 02:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coward of the County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Adam Carolla Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Alternative Tentacles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Black Flag, MDC, Duh and BGK

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

I removed the dailymail reference that you added to Mark Wahlberg. Please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, the Daily Mail is not a reliable source and should not be added to articles as a reference. Schazjmd (talk) 18:12, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Jesus Hates You has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album. Article unsourced since June 2012.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koridas ^talk? 18:43, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hardcore punk, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages In My Eyes and Good Clean Fun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Queers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Black Flag and Manhattan Beach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hi Hoponpop69! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Donald Trump that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:36, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hardcore punk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArnabSaha -- ArnabSaha (talk) 13:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Hardcore punk you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Hardcore punk for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArnabSaha -- ArnabSaha (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hardcore punk, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robo, Scream and Thundercat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hardcore punk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Count Me Out.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Howdy. I have a dilemma you might be able to help me with.

I saw in the edit history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discordianism&type=revision&diff=750397473&oldid=742679404 that you're the one who gave Ek-sen-trik-kuh Discordia: The Tales of Shamlicht its own paragraph in Discordianism. It was removed in this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discordianism&oldid=1006830376. The editor's notes for that edit say, " Ek-sen-trik-kuh Discordia: The Tales of Shamlicht is not considered a major Discordian work and this edit was placed here by the author."

Now here's my dilemma. I believe it is notable enough to be included in the article. You can see the paragraph at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discordianism&oldid=1006819520#Ek-sen-trik-kuh_Discordia:_The_Tales_of_Shamlicht That paragraph, in one form or another, has been there for years. My problem is that book has a number of contributors, and I am one of them. So my adding it back in might look like shameless self-promotion or some such.

I am friends with the primary author, who claims he is not you. So would you consider adding that paragraph back in?

Thanks for your consideration. Alden Loveshade (talk) 20:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Feel free to add it back, I don't remember adding it in the first place. I mostly just removed unsourced content from that page.Hoponpop69 (talk) 22:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate the suggestion, but I'd really rather not, especially as part of the reason for removing it was alleged conflict of interest/shameless self-promotion. I understand if you don't want to add it back yourself; if not, I could mention it on the article's talk page. Please let me know what you prefer. Alden Loveshade (talk) 23:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sure, mention it in the talk.Hoponpop69 (talk) 00:54, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the suggestion. I added a note to the talk page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Discordianism#Ek-sen-trik-kuh_Discordia Alden Loveshade (talk) 20:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, BBC Sessions: 1964-1977, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 03:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Regarding Rock Against Sexism, I don't think it's a good idea to delete all the prose from an article and then nominate it for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A7. If you believe the article should be deleted, I recommend taking it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion instead. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:58, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

So you'd rather content that has never been sourced be left up there?Hoponpop69 (talk) 15:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

• No, but nominating the article at WP:AFD, as you did, was a more appropriate response. As it turns out, the article was sourced as a result. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Big Shiny Tunes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Wave.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AFI (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Squat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

 

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:25, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

If you are claiming a subject is notable and it's quite contentious, at the very least you need to throw out anything yellow, red or grey at WP:RSPS. This isn't to say if you have a bunch of green sources you'll be fine, but I don't understand why people keep using deprecated or generally unreliable source and are then surprised when others object on a highly contentious BLP. Nil Einne (talk) 18:43, 4 August 2021 (UTC) Thank you kindly!Hoponpop69 (talk) 21:43, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Hoponpop69. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BBC Sessions: 1964-1977, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Hoponpop69,

I was just handling a couple articles you tagged for PROD deletion, Joseph King (musician) and Canvas (band). I thought you might want to follow up on these nominations by considering PRODding their albums which can be found in Category:Joseph King (musician) albums and Category:Canvas (band) albums. Thank you! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samiam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Brooks.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Matt Yonker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a single reference is exclusive to Matt Yonker. It is all about the band. The single that does mention him, ref 6 is non-RS, meaning is not a reliable source. Fails WP:MUSICBIO, WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 13:34, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Yonker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Yonker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 00:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walk Together, Rock Together, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I am not quite sure what you meant with this edit: [3]. The article Theory of mind currently has 158 citations and no citations-needed-tags at all. Are the current citations not good enough, or do you really think that 158 is not enough? Or am I missing something? I do not want to sound ironic and am genuinly interested in your reasoning. Mark in wiki (talk) 18:25, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Take a look at the article, there are sections of it with large chunks unsourced such as "Philosophical and psychological roots", "Development", "Theory of mind in adults", etc. In fact, just about every section has at least one thing lacking a citation.Hoponpop69 (talk) 20:29, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear Hoponpop69, Hi... have removed the PROD from this article.. I think if you have a look at GS: (https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22Norm+entrepreneur%22&oq=) you can see a lot of articles using the term and I think this page is therefor of some use (and the term is notable). This is the thing other than WP that Googling the term comes up with (https://www.freiheit.org/southeast-and-east-asia/norm-entrepreneurship#:~:text=What%20is%20a%20Norm%20Entrepreneur,%2C%20multilateralism%2C%20and%20international%20cooperation.) Anyway - just letting you know. BEst wishes Msrasnw (talk) 16:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi Hoponpop69,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 17:39, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey! I was just reaching out to explain why I reverted your edits on those pages. To preface, I think they were very good-faith edits. I also think common sense makes it clear who the allegations are discussing (and I'll just say here that I've heard things elsewhere that make the allegations painfully believable, so I didn't delete them due to any personal disbelief). I deleted them because of general WP:BLP (Biographies of Living Persons) guidelines that would have made edits like those unacceptable. None of the sources specifically say "these allegations are about Justin Sane." They all say, "People have connected the allegations to the lead singer and the band subsequently disbanded." Regardless of common sense, the page has to reflect what is safest for the reputation of a living person who hasn't gone through a formal trial or something. It wasn't personal or anything, either. Hope you understand. Have a great day :) —Afddiary (talk) 17:47, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect Marty Walsh (ice hockey has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 11 § Marty Walsh (ice hockey until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Hoponpop69

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Mdann52, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Foot in Mouth (EP), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mdann52}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mdann52 (talk) 06:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ted Nugent, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Global, Slash and 2008 presidential election.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ted Nugent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Riptides (Canadian band), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Riptides (Canadian band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ice Cube, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White devil.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

An edit that adds two references is not a minor edit. Please read Help: Minor edit. Cullen328 (talk) 08:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Hoponpop69,

I noticed that the page for "Los Olvidados (punk band)" was reverted to a redirect after I added content highlighting their role as pioneers of skate punk, their association with notable compilations like Thrasher SkateRock, and other contributions to punk rock.

Could you help me understand the reasons for the reversion? My intent was to create a well-sourced and informative page. Would it be better for me to refine this in my sandbox and submit it for review instead?

I appreciate your time and guidance in helping me improve the article.

Thank you,

ATXHustle ATXHustle (talk) 05:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ted Nugent, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 4-F and Bill of Rights.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Hoponpop69,

Thank you for your response. I noticed an automated notification mentioning that I added links to disambiguation pages on the Ted Nugent article, but I have not made any edits to that page. My recent contributions have been focused on the Los Olvidados (punk band) article.

Could you help clarify if this is an error? I’d also like to ensure my approach to editing aligns with Wikipedia's guidelines, especially regarding the Los Olvidados article.

Thanks again for your time and assistance.

Best regards,

ATXHustle ATXHustle (talk) 21:39, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Hoponpop69

I wanted to clarify a few things and seek your help regarding the Los Olvidados (punk band) page. I have been working on improving that page, but I noticed that my edits were recently reverted. Upon reflection, I believe the edits I made were legitimate, and I was attempting to replace the redirect with accurate content that reflects the band's history and contributions. Could you please provide further clarification on the issue?

Additionally, I’ve noticed some suspicious activity related to my account, and I wanted to make you aware of it. It seems there may have been some edits made that weren’t from me, which could indicate a potential security breach. I have since updated my password and taken other measures to secure my account.

Could you kindly assist me in understanding the situation and help ensure that my edits can be reviewed and restored appropriately? I appreciate your guidance in moving forward.

Thank you for your time and assistance.

Best regards,

ATXHustle ATXHustle (talk) 22:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply