Killswitch Engage

Please don't post SmackDown! match results/match listings on WrestleMania 22 until the show has aired in the United States. Thanks. Eenu (talk) 23:09, 24 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I am sorry you are upset about this. I did not make the policy. There are a lot of people in America who like to watch the show without knowing the results. I'm sure you would expect the same courtesy if it was you doesn't like to be spoiled and who didn't see the show until 24 hours later. Feel free to add RAW results, as I believe that show is live in Canada. Eenu (talk) 23:21, 24 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Are you talking about Userboxes, the list of boxes that have facts about me on my Userpage?

OK,
1. Put this on your user page:
{{Boxboxtop|About Me|right}}
{{Boxboxbottom}}
2. Explore Wikipedia:Userboxes for userboxes you want to use.
3. When you have found one you want to use, copy the text it tells you and put it inbetween the above tags. For example:
{{Boxboxtop|About Me|right}}
{{subst:user xbox}}
{{subst:user fox}}
{{Boxboxbottom}} creates:

About Me   This user prefers the Xbox over the PlayStation 2 and GameCube.   This user contributes using Mozilla Firefox.

Tell me if you have any questions. Oh, and make sure to use the {{ and }}. I went ahead and added one for you as an example. Eenu (talk) 01:24, 25 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

It looks good. That's as fancy as I know how to do, as you can see, haha. Eenu (talk) 21:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

To join add your name (alphabetically) here and if you want you can add this userbox to your user page {{Template:User WikiProject ProWrestling}} Eenu (talk) 22:02, 25 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've reverted your change at Playboy. Please see the talk page for that article regarding celebrities and the list on the page. Dismas|^(talk) 05:05, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

You may want to edit your signature file - last I saw there was an extra "Killswitch Engage" tagged onto the end hehe. --Naha|^(talk) 05:19, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much.Loom91 18:15, 5 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I removed a number of items from the Mike Comrie article based on a number of concerns. The part about Comrie being booed read like it was from personal experience of the author, which I now see was you. For information about why this is not good, please read the policy regarding no original research or the policy what Wikipedia is not. I also felt that this was relatively unimportant information for an encyclopedic article. Just think off all the NHL players that have ever been booed at any time in their careers. Would we put this information in each one of thier articles? The last reason, was that there was a hint of it being against our NPOV policy. -- JamesTeterenko 21:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Me and the soon to be departing (hopefully not) Moe Epsilon are setting up a project to deal with the music of this great business. It will be Wikipedia:WikiProject Music of wrestling. Join if you are remotely interested - every little helps! Thanks. Kingfisherswift 17:09, 29 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

See the thing is that while you saw it, the rest of the country didn't. WWE deliberately releases its commercials and promos on future events, spoiling the outcomes of matches and whatnot, to the local media. This is stupidly done to attract the interest of fans in that local area. The same thing happened with the Vengeance DX promo. That promo spoiled the return of the DX at Vengeance as it was released roughly 2 months before Vengeance. Another thing is Wikipedia Policy which forbids the addition of spoilers as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. So please do not post spoilers until they are officially announced on either Raw, SmackDown!, and ECW or WWE.com. Thank you. 3bulletproof16 17:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Its cool, as long as it's legit and comes form an official source (Raw, SD!, ECW, WWE.com etc.) Just remember that Wikipedia is absolutely no place for fan rumors, gossip, spoilers, and other nonsense. If you could help me remind newcomers about the Crystal Ball Policy I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. --3bulletproof16 06:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

What is the deal with Khali? What happened to him, and how did people find out, nothing on wwe.com.

I don't think you will need to since in Canada SmackDown will be moving to Fridays(it was announced by The Score at the same time they made their press conferance about RAW). TJ Spyke 02:31, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Here is a link to a copy of it: [1], they announced that SD in Canada will be moving to Friday at 8PM ET(the same time it airs here in the US). TJ Spyke 02:34, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sorry people, my page was vandalised, so i have to restart it. Killswitch Engage

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --James Duggan 23:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

You attacked me with this edit: [2] James Duggan 23:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Correction, telling someone to grow a spine is offensive, making it a personal attack. Read the policy. --James Duggan 23:55, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Then you don't know what personal character means. Telling someone to grow a spine attacks their personal character as it is directed at the person. In no way can that comment be considered a comment on the content. James Duggan 00:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Telling me to grow a spine is the same as saying I'm spineless, which is definately an attack on my personal character. The policy says to comment on the content, not the contributor, meaning ANY comment toward the contributor can be considered a personal attack. James Duggan 00:12, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

• There is a chance Jeff could go to ECW or Smackdown, but nothing is set yet. WWE.com not updating doesn't mean much. Sometimes they update things, while other times they don't. Many times in the past they have listed fired people on the roster for a bit, before they finally remove them. RobJ1981 18:43, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's 100% confirmed by Dave Meltzer, who writes the Wrestling Observer newsletter, the most trusted news source in all of wrestling.

The news in the link I provided to LordsofPain.net is from Meltzer's newsletter. Dave posts some updates on his website (wrestlingobserver.com) but most of the inside stuff is only in his print newsletter and that's where LoP.net got it from. To get the news straight from Meltzer's site, go this link[3] I provided, and press "Ctrl" and F on your keyboard, type Lita and you'll see where Dave mentioned she is leaving.

When you said "PWI", do you mean the magazine Pro Wrestling Illustrated or website Pro Wrestling Insider? Neither one is really considered reliable (especially the magazine), and PW Insider mostly uses second hand information they got from the Observer Newsletter and Pro Wrestling Torch.

If you don't think Meltzer or the Torch are reliable, just read Mick Foley's books as he mentions them both and even used Wrestling Observer's Dave Meltzer as a source for his book Foley is Good. Do you work for PWI or something?

Please stop deleting the information I added, because it's 100% confirmed. I had trouble with people deleting the same sourced info for Trish Stratus and I was totally vindicated when it was mentioned on WWE.com and Raw yesterday, and I'm right about this too, so please don't delete it anymore. .--CJ 04:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! --RobJ1981 05:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Vision.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Dan Knott.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

To give the source, click on "Edit this page" on the image page at Image:Dan Knott.jpg. Then provide a URL or other information on where you obtained the image. If you took the image yourself, then say "I took this image myself" or something of the sorts. There also is not a license specified on the page. If you did take the image yourself, you then need to specify what license you wish to release the image under. I recommend {{cc-sa}}, but there are many others you could use and it it your choice. However, in order to remain on Wikipedia, the image must be released freely, under the GDFL. If you wish to maintain copyright, then the image cannot stay. If you did not take the picture, then you need to look at the website (or other location you found the image at) and determine what license applies. Good luck! Let me know if you need more help. --MECU≈talk 20:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Down at the bottom of the page you can see it says "(c)2004 Dan Knott School All rights reserved" which means the image shouldn't be on Wikipedia. It seems you have an interest in this school, so you could take a picture yourself and upload it to Wikipedia (though Commons is preferred) and then include that image in the article. Also, attempting to use it under fair use is not acceptable since it would be easily replaceable. I request you put {{db-author}} on this image and remove it from the articles it is on. Once you upload the image you take (if you do) you can then use the same name and re-install it into the articles. If you do not do so, I will list it under the Wikipedia:Copyright problems section and it will most likely be deleted shortly. I'm sorry it didn't work out this time. --MECU≈talk 20:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have put a speedy delete tag on it. WP:AFD says how to nominate an article, just for future reference. TJ Spyke 05:24, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:SwantonBomb.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've reverted this edit. Not only was it rude, but it also removed sourced, relevant material. The fact that he was beating his home team was brought up several times by both commentary and journalists, including in interviews with the Ward family. --Wafulz 04:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey, no problem. I had totally forgotten about that exchange. Thanks for the apology though. --James Duggan 04:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yep, see my userpage and the "My Edits" link. You can use that for youself as well at [[4]. So if you want to put it on your userpage or talk page, it would be [5]. TJ Spyke 05:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Are you really a wrestler? If so, what's your name and what feds have you worked in? I'm just curious. TJ Spyke 07:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Killswitch Engage! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 23:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Such a great band! (your username). -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

how come u erased what I put (below on the wrestlemania page...)

It should be noted that some big names will not be wrestling at WrestleMania. Unless there is a Royal Rumble like in years past stars like Carlito, Rick Flair, Chavo Guerrero (the cruserweight champion, Bob Holly, and Chris Masters among others will not be wrestling at WrestleMania 23.

well it is actually notable, when you dont have a 16 time champ wrestling in the biggest event and people that have been getting big pushes not being in the biggest event of the year...Can you explain how that is not botable and I will leave the page be...

I am a huge wrestling fan, I am just trying to point it out on the page so incase other people didnt notice it...

ok, that is cool I guess... I was just trying to help a little...

But I wasnt listing every wrestler...just the bigger ones...

nice talking to you....

Peace

It looks much better. It could use some references though, but so do a lot of wrestling srticles. TJ Spyke 21:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Here is one page: [6]. There may not be that many though. TJ Spyke 23:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

It is generally reliable, I have used it for a lot of references in the Shelton Benjamin and Bryan Danielson articles. TJ Spyke 23:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

This page should help: Wikipedia:Citing sources#Footnotes. TJ Spyke 00:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Rockers were notable. OWW isn't theonly source, they were just the first one that came to mind. TJ Spyke 03:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well for one, the info is not used in wrestler articles because the info is already found in Music in professional wrestling. And second, you also removed the referrence section of the article.-- bulletproof ^3:16 03:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Damn Marks-- bulletproof ^3:16 03:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good god... You know, I bet this is WWE's way at getting back at Wikipedia for being IWC central-- bulletproof ^3:16 04:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's ok. I did the same thing once or twice when I was starting out. Don't worry about it. Gavyn Sykes 05:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 04:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

An automatic notification by BrownBot 23:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 23:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Killswitch Engage (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Unfair shared IP block

Decline reason:

Follow instructions below. - auburnpilot talk 05:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

1. If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
   Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
   If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
2. Try to edit the Sandbox.
3. If you are still blocked, copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "IP blocked?" section.
4. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing.

{unblock-auto|ip address|Unfairly blocked because of shared IP|User:Bongwarrior}

I don't know my IP adress. Help me.

Please follow the instructions above exactly, or we are unable to unblock you. Sandstein (talk) 07:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

The WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter Issue V — December 16, 2007

Project News IWGP World Tag Team Championship has been elevated to Featured list status. Its nomination page can be viewed here. WWE One Night Stand failed Featured list nomination. Its nomination page can be viewed here. Randy Orton failed its Good Article nomination. AJPW Triple Crown Championship and Royal Rumble are currently Featured list candidates. Their respective nomination pages can be found here and here. Briscoe Brothers, Don Kent (wrestler), King of the Ring (1994), Mickie James, and WrestleMania III are currently Good article candidates. No Way Out (2004) and SummerSlam (2007) have each been listed for peer review. Please review these articles and make suggestions for their improvement. Their respective peer reviews can be found here and here. Current Events Ric Flair's 19-year-old son Reid Fliehr has been signed to a developmental contract by World Wrestling Entertainment. Jake Roberts took up an offer from World Wrestling Entertainment to pay for drug rehab for any former WWE wrestler. Collaboration of the Week The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for December 16 through December 22 is The Fabulous Moolah. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The monthly featured article collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, December 23. Cast your vote to select the monthly featured article collaboration! — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!

Member News Based on the members list, there are currently 298 members participating in WikiProject Professional wrestling On the calendar: Dec. 16 - WWE presents Armageddon Dec. 23 - Paulley's birthday Dec. 24 - Racer38's birthday Dec. 27 - Truco9311's birthday From the Editors The WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter is starting up an interview segment that has been in the works for some time now. The current schedule for interviews can be seen here. If you would like to submit a question for an interviewee, please do so by following the instructions here. We are accepting questions for any future interviews. If you would like to sign up to be interviewed, then you may do so here. We hope that this segment will be one of the most popular this project's newsletter has to offer, and promote a greater sense of community amongst the project members. The first interview will be published in next week's issue, and will be with TJ Spyke. In other matters, we are still running low on current events. If you know of any in the wrestling world that you believe merit mention in the newsletter, or wish to comment on any other aspect of the newsletter, then please contact us here. Thanks everyone, and enjoy the holiday season. ~ The Hybrid T/C Contributors to this Issue: GaryColemanFan (talk · contribs) LAX (talk · contribs) Nikki311 (talk · contribs) The Chronic (talk · contribs) The Hybrid (talk · contribs) TJ Spyke (talk · contribs) Discussion • Suggestions • Feedback

You are receiving this because because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you would rather receive a notification of the newsletter sent to you, please add your name to this list. If you no longer wish to receive any notice of the newsletter, please add your name to this list.

Please stop changing the infobox. That Lowe has to get approval from Katz (and EIG) to make his moves is because the ownership of the team is in flux, not because it has completed the change. It is blatantly untrue to state that Katz is the owner of the team at this time, because he has not been confirmed as such by the NHL Board of Governors. That is why the infobox says that a sale is pending to Katz. Until this step is complete, the formal owner of the Edmonton Oilers is EIG. Until the BOG vote, Katz is not the owner, he merely has an agreement to purchase the team. There is a significant difference between these two statements. Regards, Resolute 06:22, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

"All intents and purposes" is not fact, and rather is blatantly POV. The BOG vote is just a formality, I agree, but that does not mean that Katz will be confirmed as the owner of the team until the vote is complete. Wikipedia deals in verifiable truth, not "well, it's going to happen, so lets change it now." And my location is completely irrelevant. Personally, I think the sale to Katz will be a very good thing for the Oilers, as EIG has been a decidedly mediocre owner of that franchise. Regardless, the change has to wait until the sale is complete. Resolute 06:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't disagree that it is guaranteed to happen, but the Edmonton media reporting it as a fait acompli doesn't make it done. I had to protect the Johan Santana article last week for much the same reason - everyone knew he was going to be a New York Met in a matter of days, but until the deal was actually signed off on by the league, he was still formally a Twin. Much like the BOG vote, the updating of this article should wait until the sale is complete. There is no harm in the current statement - that EIG still formally owns the team, with a sale to Katz pending league approval. Resolute 06:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Actually, the statement is completely true. Katz does not formally own the team until the BOG approves. The need for the business to gain the approval of an incoming owner is a standard business practice, and does not invalidate the statement as it stands. Resolute 06:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

what i did on cenas page is notable to me and others so keep it it provided info to a progect i was doing as well as other people to both me and another user came to agreements on this as he was the first triple treat takeover so please keep it this is an enciclpedia and it was help ful to me and freinds so it must be notable as i'm studing wrestling so think mabey not notteble to you but is to others KCDavis (talk) 19:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I can explain. The reason as to why former NWA champions in TNA are usually also called former TNA champions isn't necessarily because TNA considers NWA title reigns as part of the TNA title's history. Its actually because they held the NWA title within TNA. It’s the same reason as to why Randy Orton is sometimes called the youngest WWE champion in the history of the company even though he became the youngest champion with the World Heavyweight title and not the WWE title. It’s just a much easier way for both companies to add some relevance to certain reigns in current events than to go into a more complex explanation for fans to understand. -- bulletproof ^3:16 04:35, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply