Doc Taxon

Thanks for uploading Image:Pallas PS.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, — Edwin Stearns | Talk 21:50, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Yes, that paper would be very helpful. Thank you. Shyamal (talk) 03:55, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

You wrote:

Dear Iss246! You are from New York? Is it possible to provide me with a copy of following? http://clio.cul.columbia.edu:7018/vwebv/holdingsInfo?bibId=5082330

   * Anon. (1799): Obituary of James Bolton. Leeds Mercury or General Advertiser, Saturday, january 19th, vol. 32, no. 1668: p. 3

Holding: Butler Library, 535 West 114th St., New York, NY 10027 I only need a copy of page 3. If You can help me anyhow, I will be very glad and grateful, Kind regards, Doc Taxon (talk) 05:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

I would have been able to get what you wanted a month ago but not now. For more than 25 years I taught a biostatistics course for the Dept. of Psychiatry, and by virtue of that appointment had access to all CU's libraries. I took advantage of the library card too. Like Walter Alston of the Dodgers, I had a series of one-year contracts. But alas, I was not renewed on July 1. My library card is no longer operative. I wish I could have helped you.

If you or someone you know knows a Columbia student, that student can have access to the document, and transmit a copy to you. You probably know someone who knows someone who knows someone who is either a student or faculty member at Columbia. I imagine that by the time I have written to you, you will have solved your problem of access. Best wishes. Let me know if you succeeded.Iss246 (talk) 12:27, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I shall be in Leeds Central Library sometime this week, I'll see what I can find. Regards, Mtaylor848 (talk) 11:33, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'll see what I can do.--droptone (talk) 20:22, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

thanks a lot in advance! Doc Taxon (talk) 09:09, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Filled.--droptone (talk) 19:19, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

You know those pages refer to the notes and appendix, and that the book is in Spanish, right?--droptone (talk) 17:43, 12 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Here is the file.--droptone (talk) 15:19, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello Doc Taxon, I'd much appreciate any help you can offer! Let me know - thank you. Best, WikiJedits (talk) 18:27, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Doc Taxon, sorry for the delay. I haven't been on here for a while. Thanks very much for the additions to the article – I think you filled in the name I'd not been able to read, which was what I wanted. Thank you!

I have no idea how to transfer a file – I have never done this on Wikipedia before. Let me see if I can find out. Some of the regulars on the resource exchange desk seem to be uploading them to Windows Live sites http://cid-d7eef6a0e20c1e42.office.live.com/browse.aspx/Wikipedia or Google sites https://sites.google.com/site/droptone/ but I do not know how they set this up. Best, WikiJedits (talk) 18:03, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank for the message on my talk page. Yes, it is still open as far as I'm concerned although user:Edison was the primary objector to the article's statements on Jedlik. I see the section has acquired a new reference from Nature 53 1896 since I last looked. However, the insertion is from a now blocked user who was placing a lot of dubious Hungarian related material on Wikipedia. Are you able to obtain a copy of the Nature article? We need to verify that it does contain an article on Jedlik, and if so, that it supports the claim made. SpinningSpark 06:33, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Doc Taxon, and thanks for your note on my talk page. I am not able to scan those articles for you, but you might ask for information at the San Diego Natural History Museum, http://www.sdnhm.org/about/directory.html . Or you could ask the San Diego Public Library directly, http://www.sandiego.gov/public-library/services/asksdpl.shtml . Good luck with your research! --MelanieN (talk) 13:12, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've been busy dealing with drama and some other stuff, sorry :| - No I no longer need those. Also, next time, let me reply to someone on my talk page. ;)Mitch32^{(Transportation Historian)} 14:20, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, apologies about the delay - been busy in the past week. I do live in Manchester but I'm not a student at the University of Manchester. Although I'm a college student at a college in Manchester - the problem is that local students (from Greater Manchester colleges) are only allowed to just visit the library for reference (not borrow books). And even then, you have to sign up for access pass, which I am told is an unnecessary long winded process by my college librarian. Sorry, I couldn't be of more help - regards Stevo1000 (talk) 16:37, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Thank you anyway, Doc Taxon (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

The place of death is not clearly stated in doi:10.1098/rsbm.1997.0010, but he lifed in Farnham Common.--Stone (talk) 09:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

thank you! Doc Taxon (talk) 16:14, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Doc Taxon. You have new messages at Mr.choppers's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

My friend (who works in the Columbia University Law Library) got me the book today, and I finished scanning it. I need your e-mail and then I can send you the whole shebang. Best regards,  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 17:57, 2 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

In regards your request for the article from the Carnegie Library, I'll see what I can do. It may be a week or two. — AlekJDS ^talk 05:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi! That request is now closed. Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 20:10, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much! It was very kind of you to pick this up, I didn't like to ask again so you've done me a big favour! I'll go and update WP:REX now. Cheers. Nortonius (talk) 16:43, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

you're welcome! -- Doc Taxon (talk) 17:20, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

I am unable to access that Evernote notebook now. I don't remember accessing it in 2009 either. JMiall₰ 21:53, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi Doc Taxon. Thanks for asking, already got it. I've marked the topic as "resolved". Best wishes, Filip em (talk) 15:18, 31 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Doc, Well, I'm not sure how active the Resource Exchange is, but I doubt I'm going to get any further response. So probably it's fine to archive. - Nunh-huh 13:52, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello there - sorry for the delay in reply as I have been really busy. Basically the request has not been solved - I know that it has been some time now since the request was made, but I would still be interested in finding the information some how. I thought it was worth a try there given the collectors status Jackie magazines have.Rain the 1 17:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'll try to help you getting this interview. -- Doc Taxon (talk) 18:08, 7 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you - I would be really happy for the help. :)Rain the 1 21:00, 7 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the request is still open. Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 16:45, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much! WhisperToMe (talk) 17:31, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

It would be a copy of the episode so I can watch it and confirm what is stated on it. A transcript would also be good. I do not know if a transcript exists. WhisperToMe (talk) 17:48, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

• Yep, it's Undercurrents :) WhisperToMe (talk) 19:45, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Just posted the info on Lead's page WhisperToMe (talk) 18:35, 10 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi! It's still active! Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 15:14, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

WP:REX#The Builder 1948 Vol 175 can be closed, thanks. Bencherlite^Talk 15:37, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

whisper (dot) world (at) yahoo (dot) com :) WhisperToMe (talk) 16:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC) Thank you! WhisperToMe (talk) 16:22, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Doc! WhisperToMe (talk) 22:54, 15 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's not been satisfactorily resolved since different sources differ on the dates. The article now includes the differences for lack of a better solution. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 12:01, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Not necessarily. It was in the middle of a dispute back then, and hence the over-referencing. In fact the article has quite a substantial amount of over-referencing incidents. Some pruning would be greatly helpful. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 03:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

You recently added a birth year to his article. Any editor can remove this as unsourced but I didn't. Do you have a reliable source for it?--Canoe1967 (talk) 16:47, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have had huge battles over birth dates before. I even emailed Mr. Erickson about his source for Sondra Locke's. I will avoid it with his article though. If he reads the article he may decide whether it is accurate or not properly sourced.--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code that was emailed to you.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 18:11, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes I got the email - many thanks. I thought I had already replied but clearly my mind is playing tricks on me. Very interesting and useful reading. Thanks very much for your help. Bencherlite^Talk 17:46, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I found your listing at WP:REX and I'm hoping you can help me. I need a very specific piece of information (and, ideally, a quote and page number) from this book:

• Strieder, Peter (2012). Dürer. Langewiesche K.R. ISBN 978-3784591421.

In previous editions of the book (in the 1970s and 1980s), Strieder did not accept Lotte Brand Philip's identification of a picture at the Germanisches Nationalmuseum as being Durer's portrait of his mother and therefore part of a diptych of his parents (see the wikilinked article for background). I need to confirm whether Strieder maintains the same position in the 2012 edition of the book—but it has only been released in German, so it's not very easy to find in the US.

I noticed that WP:REX has a link to de:WP:BIBA; would that be a good place to start? Any advice would be welcome. Maralia (talk) 20:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for ordering the book to help me with this—I just couldn't get my hands on it over here in the US. A few notes that may help you find the right passage:

• The information I'm looking for would likely be in a chapter about Dürer's earliest work; he painted these in 1490, when he was 19, and they are his earliest surviving paintings.
• You can see the portraits here: Portrait Diptych of Dürer's Parents.

Strieder's opinion on this is important because in addition to being a Dürer expert, he was for 25 years the head curator of paintings at GNM (which holds the mother's portrait). Thanks again for looking into this for me. Maralia (talk) 15:10, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so very much for the quotes! I get the meaning of them, but I would also appreciate a translation to make sure I've not misread anything. Really appreciate your help, and excellent timing: I am working on the article right now. Maralia (talk) 18:39, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Doc Taxon. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 20:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 20:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request#Boletus_atlanticus. GabrielF (talk) 15:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.

It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitz gmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, WP:The Wikipedia Library has record of you being approved for access to Oxford University Press's humanities materials through the TWL partnership described at WP:OUP . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email from User:Nikkimaria several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at Wikipedia talk:OUP/Approved. Thanks much, Sadads (talk) 22:11, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Note: You are receiving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at Wikipedia talk:OUP/Approved.Reply

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi! You seem to be reverting my changes to Wikipedia entries and MediaWiki Commons items which involve logos of the Namecoin project. Please stop: the purple logo is incorrect and is being pushed by an outsider who goes by the name "Sudo" and "Sudoquai". This person is not an official contributor to the project and these logos have NOT been adopted by the Namecoin project. You can verify this for yourself by checking out Namecoin.org.

The only place this logo has been used is on unofficial social media accounts controlled by Sudo. These accounts have been publicly admonished by the Namecoin team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indolering (talk • contribs) 12:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

please consider the summaries to further edits in the article. -- Doc Taxon (talk) 17:31, 10 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

test

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

I am afraid it has been sitting in my Sandkiste for a long time. If that were en:wiki I would have opened a sandbox on the article- transferred it over then invited other users to correct it. My written German is not strong enough to do a full copyedit but the facts are fine and referenced. So I have done the next best thing I have copied over the text- and added it in comment brackets on the article page. If you have time- please do use it to replace the stub. -- Clem Rutter (talk) 17:12, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

whispertotheworld (at) gmail (dot) com

Thank you :) WhisperToMe (talk) 19:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Doc Taxon. You have new messages at De728631's talk page.
Message added 17:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

De728631 (talk) 17:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your category addition on iron. Iron (native) is under telluric iron and meteoric iron. Thx --Chris.urs-o (talk) 03:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

There is no time limit, only when the issue is resolved. GiantSnowman 19:40, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello there.

I see that you offered your help with this request on the resource exchange. I was wondering which pages you could help the requester with.

The reason why I'm asking is that I can access all of the requested materials except for The History of the Duke of Cornwall's Light Infantry, 1939-45. However, it would require me to go to the library and scan the pages.

Please let me know which ones you can do, and I can cover the other ones except for Duke of Cornwall's Light Infantry. Thanks. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

@MrLinkinPark333: yes, you are right. The only possible thing is to go to the library and to scan the pages, even for me too. Often it's not possible to get the materials by online access. But there are many libraries here, who could help to receive the article. But it takes a little more time than usual. If you want to fetch the materials or if I fetch the materials, it's both the same. Doc Taxon (talk) 07:00, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Doc Taxon: We could divide up the sources. I can't access Duke of Cornwall's Light Infantry. If you could access that one, that would be great. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:28, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

yes, it'll be okay. Thank you, Doc Taxon (talk) 20:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Doc Taxon. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

- LouisAragon (talk) 13:46, 6 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

 

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 22, April-May 2017

• New and expanded research accounts
• Global branches update
• Spotlight: OCLC Partnership
• Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 23, June-July 2017

• Library card
• User Group update
• Global branches update
• Spotlight: Combating misinformation, fake news, and censorship
• Bytes in brief

Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017

• User Group update
• Global branches update
  • Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
• Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
• Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
• Bytes in brief

Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017

• OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref
• User Group update
• Global branches update
• Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia
• Bytes in brief

Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018

• #1Lib1Ref
• User Group update
• Global branches update
• Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
• Bytes in brief

Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018

• #1Lib1Ref
• New collections
  • Alexander Street (expansion)
  • Cambridge University Press (expansion)
• User Group
• Global branches update
  • Wiki Indaba Wikipedia + Library Discussions
• Spotlight: Using librarianship to create a more equitable internet: LGBTQ+ advocacy as a wiki-librarian
• Bytes in brief

Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 28, April – May 2018

• #1Bib1Ref
• New partners
  • Rock's Backpages
  • Invaluable
  • Termsoup
• User Group update
• Global branches update
  • Wikipedia Library global coordinators' meeting
• Spotlight: What are the ten most cited sources on Wikipedia? Let's ask the data
• Bytes in brief

Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018

• New partners
  • Economic & Political Weekly–10 accounts
• Wikimania
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018

• Library Card translation
• Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref spreads to the Southern Hemisphere and beyond
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018

• OAWiki
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019

• #1Lib1Ref
• New and expanded partners
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019

• #1Lib1Ref
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019

• Partnerships
• #1Lib1Ref
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• Global branches update
• Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

@User:Doc Taxon: Bitte den Filter umgehend deaktivieren. Du hast damit die gesamte deutschsprachige Wikipedia in den read-only-Modus gesetzt. Chaddy (talk) 01:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Folgende Fehlermeldung erscheint: "Fehler: Diese Aktion wurde automatisch als schädlich erkannt und deshalb nicht ausgeführt. Wenn du denkst, dass deine Aktion konstruktiv war, wende dich bitte an einen Administrator und schildere ihm, was du versucht hast beizutragen. Kurzbeschreibung der verletzten Regel: unerwünschter externer Weblink (alle ns) " Chaddy (talk) 01:03, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Jetzt funktioniert alles wieder. Chaddy (talk) 01:06, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019

• Wikimania
• We're building something great, but..
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
• A Wikibrarian's story
• Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019

• #1Lib1Ref January 2020
• #1Lib1Ref 2019 stories and learnings

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Regarding both your edits at Wikipedia:Requests for page importation and at User talk:Bay Staatsoper, you are basically barging in and telling well-informed people who gave correct answers that they are wrong and you are right and the matter is closed. I don't know if this person is a friend of yours, or you just decided to act as their proxy here for some other reason, but it comes across and imperious and dismissive, while also being incorrect on it's face because you clearly haven't taken the time to be sure you understand how these processes work here, now, on this project. Your OTRS evidence is not only irelevant but actully supports the reasons for issuing block, so making notifications about it won't change well-established policies like WP:ORGNAME and WP:ROLE, both of which I had already referenced and explained what the problem was, twice, before you came along and insisted you'd fixed everything when you haven't at all.

In short, you may think you are doing this person a favor but you are actually just muddying the waters. It's important that they understand these rules if they want to edit here, and they need to make their own request to be unblocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:56, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Beeblebrox: Please make sure that I am not a friend of this user. I don't know him. I checked the policies you stated above and now I understand. Sorry for the problems. Please note that I'm right because of the request of page importation because the contents of CC licenses are all the same in every Wikipedia project. It also belongs to the threshold of originality. user:Graham87 was right with his statement, I copied the article in the workspace of this user, who also is editor of the article in German wikipedia. Kind regards, Doc Taxon (talk) 00:05, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Doc Taxon, you may like to avoid expressions such as "Please note that I'm right", because there is a possibility that some people may see it as arrogant and imperious. You may find it goes down better to say something such as "I believe that I was right", even if you are in fact absolutely certain in your own mind that you are right. I see that you refer to the relevant Creative Commons licenses (though not the GFDL). Presumably therefore you are aware of the requirement for attribution, which is missing from the copy you have made. Since you are so certain that you are right that you can dismiss Beeblebrox's concerns so forcefully as you have done, you may like to explain what mistake I have made in thinking that the lack of attribution makes the copy a copyright violation, so that I don't make the mistake of deleting it. Or perhaps you could admit that you are wrong, and put your mistake right. (You may also like to re-read the heading of this talk page section.) JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 21:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

@JBW: I try to explain: first "Please note that I'm right" has been come from my not so good English speaking. I'm sorry if the words have been chosen wrong.

next: Creative Commons license, attribution BY:

if the author of the text and the translator (or the copying person) of the text are the same person, we don't need to identify the author in the translation's revision history once more. (This is also valid, if there are two different account names of this one author.) The following revisions of the German article done by other persons are so very minor, that they are not within the threshold of originality. So in this case there is no need of an importation of the revisions of this article. Doc Taxon (talk) 10:51, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

So are you saying that Anna (Bay Staatsoper) is another account of yours? JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 12:40, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

No, but I acted on the behalf of this account, as intermediary. Doc Taxon (talk) 13:09, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

And your "help" in this matter has been uniformly unhelpful. Why you again crated the userpage I previously deleted, I can't imagine, except that you once again wanted to show how very right you are. There's no reason for it. Nobody, at any point in this entire affair, has expressed doubt that this account isn't exactly who they say they are, so offering your proof again and again is just meaningless noise. Since you seem determined to keep un-helping in this manner, I have opened a thread about your recent behavior here. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:51, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

• Well, I give up. I drew your attention to your failure to attribute the work you copied, to give you a chance to correct your mistake. It really didn't occur to me that you might not take up that chance, but you didn't; instead you quoted at me a passage which included "if the author of the text and ... the copying person ... are the same person" and "This is also valid, if there are two different account names of this one author" (my emphasis). I was at first somewhat taken aback by your apparent inability to see that the passage you yourself had quoted in defence of your own action actually explained why your action was wrong. There seemed to me to be only one possible rational explanation, and that one seemed extremely unlikely: that the two accounts were in fact both yours. I therefore asked you about that, for two reasons. Firstly, if the accounts actually were both you, you could explain that they were. Secondly if (as seemed much more likely) they weren't both you, but you had somehow failed to notice those words in the passage you quoted, then mentioning it would draw the matter to your attention, and you could deal with your mistake. You appear, however, to have still failed to understand that what you had quoted applied only if the person who did the copying was the same person who had written the material in the first case. Previous things you had said gave the impression that you have significant difficulties understanding what is said to you and what you are doing, but this shows the difficulties are more severe than I realised. I don't think there is any point in further attempts to help you.
• To remove any doubt, none of what I have said about difficulty in understanding relates to English not being your native language. The failures to understand are at a completely different level. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 22:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Soviet professional wrestlers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:49, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 37, November – December 2019

• #1Lib1Ref
• Wikimedia and Libraries User Group

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

hi, i am sorry - i am not very skilled in heraldy - simple flags with templates for elements are ok - i am not able to create coat of arms - perhaps have a look at

• de:Wikipedia:WikiProjekt Wappen
• c:Commons:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology
• en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology

--Mrmw (talk) 18:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020

• New partnership
• Global roundup

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020

• Library Card Platform
• New partnerships
  • ProQuest
  • Springer Nature
  • BioOne
  • CEEOL
  • IWA Publishing
  • ICE Publishing
• Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020

• New partnerships
  • Al Manhal
  • Ancestry
  • RILM
• #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
• AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 41, September – October 2020

• New partnership: Taxmann
• WikiCite
• 1Lib1Ref 2021

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020

• New EBSCO collections now available
• 1Lib1Ref 2021 underway
• Library Card input requested
• Libraries love Wikimedia, too!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021

• New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
• 1Lib1Ref
• Library Card

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

The precedent and current consensus is that government/official documentation such as the one you used to source a date of birth should not be used. This is for two reasons: first, there is no indication that the person in the document is the same person in the article. Second, documents such as these often contain very personal information such as a home address, phone number, etc. which (unless widely disseminated and/or easily found online) constitutes a violation of WP:OSPOL #1.

Including a DOB is often a very controversial move on BLPs, mainly due to the (sometimes unwritten) rules about proper sourcing, so I just wanted to let you know a bit more about why I removed what you felt was appropriate information. Primefac (talk) 10:51, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021

• New Library Card designs
• 1Lib1Ref May

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021

• Library design improvements continue
• New partnerships
• 1Lib1Ref update

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 46, July – August 2021

• Library design improvements deployed
• New collections available in English and German
• Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021

• On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
• Search tool deployed
• New My Library design improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

		The Diligent Librarian Barnstar
		For exemplary service at the Resource Exchange, tirelessly delivering the reliable sources on which this encyclopedia depends, please accept this award. :) Gazal world (talk) 09:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much! I'm always doing my best ... Doc Taxon (talk) 10:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank You very Much for helping me with a source! I added the information from Dr. Würsig into the article: [1]. Good luck! Эйхер (talk) 15:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021

• 1Lib1Ref 2022
• Wikipedia Library notifications deployed

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022

• New library collections
• Blog post published detailing technical improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 50, March – April 2022

• New library partner - SPIE
• 1Lib1Ref May 2022 underway

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)Reply

Hello, Doc Taxon. I'd like to personally thank you for fulfilling the request about Adrienne Boulvin's book. I searched the pages you sent me, and, as a bonus, discovered another variant of The Children with the Golden Locks (a Georgian tale of type ATU 707).KHR FolkMyth (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@KHR FolkMyth: cool, this reads amazing. Your welcome, – Doc Taxon • Talk • 07:24, 16. Jul 2022 (UTC)

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022

• New library partners
  • SAGE Journals
  • Elsevier ScienceDirect
  • University of Chicago Press
  • Information Processing Society of Japan
• Feedback requested on this newsletter
• 1Lib1Ref May 2022

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Doc, it's been a while since you fulfilled my resource request for Deutschlands Generale und Admirale about Konrad Haase. I wanted to ask if you might know about the image permissions for the book. Is there an appendix somewhere that lists the image sources? I would like to know when the image of Haase was taken, who holds the copyright, and if I could use it onwiki. I think the terms are life + 70. I have tried to search the Bundesarchiv, but did not find anything online. Toadspike (talk) 14:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Toadspike: This will take some days, please be patient. Kind regards, – Doc Taxon • Talk • 14:46, 14. Sep 2022 (UTC)

@Toadspike: sorry for waiting. No, there's no image list. The photograph should be made before 1946. Because the photographer is unknown, the picture is not free yet. You must not use it, sorry. – Doc Taxon • Talk • 13:26, 18. Oct 2022 (UTC)

That’s alright, thank you! Toadspike (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  The Wikipedia Library

 

Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022

• New instant-access collections:
  • SpringerLink and Springer Nature
  • Project MUSE
  • Taylor & Francis
  • ASHA
  • Loeb
• Feedback requested on this newsletter

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Doc Taxon. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ciridae (talk) 05:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Doc Taxon,

Thank you for creating Torsten Haß.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the page! This was previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torsten Haß. Currently, almost all refs are still retrieved from September 2021, has additional refs emerged allowing WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR, or other criteria of WP:NBIO to be passed? Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 08:34, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

@VickKiang: Thanks for your info! Please let me know: is there any problem with biography guidelines? – Doc Taxon • Talk • 09:07, 11. Nov 2022 (UTC)

Most of the refs are Bibliographic records (non-SIGCOV) or non-independent reviews by Torsten himself. Other refs, e.g., 1, appear also to be trivial mentions (e.g., the one here is a staff listing). I would appreciate if you could list two or three of the best references not previously listed or discussed in the AfD (where the community found consensus that those sources were inadequate) showing a meeting of WP:GNG or WP:BASIC, or alternatively if other criteria of WP:NBIO is met, for instance, demonstrating that one of Torsten's books received multiple independent reliable in-depth reviews. VickKiang (talk) 09:12, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Torsten Haß requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torsten Haß. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:29, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022

• New collections:
  • Edward Elgar
  • E-Yearbook
  • Corriere della Serra
  • Wikilala
• Collections moved to Library Bundle:
  • Ancestry
• New feature: Outage notification
• Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

		A beer on me!
		Here's a beer for your fine efforts on improving Wikipedia! Cheers! On behalf of all beer-loving Wikipedians, thank you for facilitating fastidious fact-checking! -- NotaBene 鹰百利 Talk 21:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Fine! You're welcome! – Doc Taxon • Talk • 00:12, 11. Dec 2022 (UTC)

 

MBlaze Lightning (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

MBlaze Lightning (talk) 09:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022

• New collections:
  • British Newspaper Archive
  • Findmypast
  • University of Michigan Press
  • ACLS
  • Duke University Press
• 1Lib1Ref 2023
• Spotlight: EDS Refine Results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Doc Taxon. I remember you showed me what was said of Fritz Neumayr in the book Legenden in Weiß und Blau. 100 Jahre Fußballgeschichte eines Münchner Traditionsvereines - do you think you could also let me know what is said of Fritz Sommer and Otto Oeldenberger (if they are covered)? I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks, BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:00, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I have the whole lexicon of most important players and trainers as chapter within the book. Unfortunately it's in German language only. I can send you the whole chapter, and translate the parts of these two footballers (yes, they are covered). Please send me a wikimail to provide you with the chapter. Kind regards, – Doc Taxon • Talk • 19:26, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I sent you a wikimail. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@BeanieFan11:   Sent – Doc Taxon • Talk • 08:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023

• New bundle partners:
  • Newspapers.com
  • Fold3
• 1Lib1Ref January report
• Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Doc! You sent me an email but it hasn't arrived. Would you mind trying again? Jenhawk777 (talk) 03:15, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply