BernardaAlba

I reverted your edit to Spain as it does not match the figure in the article text which are supported by citations. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:48, 17 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I reverted your recent additions of   European Union to the infoboxes of all EU members. Please read WP:ICONDECORATION to find that such kind of decoration is not supported on Wikipedia. Tomeasy _{T C}

Please stop adding pictures of EU flag to various articles.

Please keep in mind that replacement of existing pictures with EU flag may also be considered as vandalism. Kérek kerék kerek (talk) 22:51, 1 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'd be glad to help, if I'm able. Therequiembellishere (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. In Democratic Party (Luxembourg), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Centre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited Union, Progress and Democracy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rafael Sánchez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Elections to the General Council of the Principality of Asturias, 2012 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WarlordFrederick (talk) 00:01, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Gorka Maneiro Labayen has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Whenaxis talk · contribs | DR goes to Wikimania! 22:29, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I noticed that in Ignacio Prendes you linked years/dates. Please note that this is not normally done on en.WP. Thanks. Tony (talk) 05:50, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Castile (historical region) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Toledo, Cuenca, Santander, La Rioja and Ávila

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I'm Polish.

Hello, BernardaAlba,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Polish parliamentary election, 2015 should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polish parliamentary election, 2015 .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Müdigkeit (talk) 22:12, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited LIDEM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:51, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Why are u changing the numbers from the UK? According to eurostat (and it's not a forecast anymore) the british economy grew at a 0% rate! From where do the -0.2 percent come from?Olliyeah (talk) 12:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Por favor, deje de realizar cambios injustificados en la pagina Spain, o me obligará a denunciarlo por no consensuarlos. Es un artículo enciclopédico, no una revista de fotografias. Gracias, un saludo. --Bashevis6920 (talk) 19:08, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

No dudo de su buena voluntad, pero por favor, deténgase. Está alterando todo el artículo. Si quiere realizar cambios, consensúelos, esa es la política de Wikipedia. Algunas de sus aportaciones han sido correctas, pero otras fueron completamente desafortunadas e innecesarias. Saludos. --Bashevis6920 (talk) 19:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

No se trata de saturar el artículo con imágenes. La foto de Almodóvar es irrelevante, innecesaria y con una más que cuestionable importancia histórica, teniendo en consideración, que el director de cine español más influyente internacionalmente fue Buñuel.

Le ruego que no añada más imágenes. Un saludo.--Bashevis6920 (talk) 19:33, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cartagena and Jaén (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Castile and León, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page León (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coat of arms of Castile and León, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Realism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from removing the 'Spanish nationalism' item in the Ideology section of the Infobox. This is correctly cited. If you disagree with its inclusion, make your case in the Talk page. Thanks! Tomclarke (talk) 10:57, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

This is the English version of Wikipedia so it's not really appropriate for you to make your arguments in Spanish.

I will respond again: because the party itself doesn't describe itself as nationalist, doesn't mean that it isn't. Based on policy, external analysis and now Rosa Diez's most recent articles, it is clear that UPyD doesn't embrace or propose an anti-nationalist or a post-national agenda in any way. It is clear, in point of fact, that UPyD is "unequivocally national". What could this possibly mean if it isn't that the party is dedicated to the protection and promotion of the Spanish nation? I've provided links to back up this argument. In response, you revert my edits without any attempt to explain or cite sources, and no attempt to build consensus. Simply commenting on my talk page that UPyD isn't a nationalist party isn't the same as trying to engage in debate or build consensus. I will add this comment to your Talk pages as well. Tomclarke (talk) 12:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi BernardaAlba. Why have you found it necessary to revert the change I did to the European Union article on 19 October, when I changed the "main article" link under "History" to only link to History of the European Union, instead of linking both to that article and the very, very wide article History of Europe. You have now re-inserted the link to History of Europe, and I can't understand why, as you haven't given any reasons for your change (while I did). A check back in the article history, shows that it was you who added that link on 3 October, the same day you also added the equally very wide article Western culture to the main article links under "Culture and sport".

The article is about the European Union, not about Europe in general. Extremely few who call up the article European Union will at that point be interested to read about how Homo erectus migrated into Europe almost two million years ago. If they are, they can just click on the link Europe in the very first sentence, as that will take them to all the general articles about Europe. To keep that link would make as much sense as to add it to every article about every country in Europe - and to the articles about EFTA, NATO and the Warsaw Pact.

So, can you please explain your reasoning behind having that link there? Best regards, Thomas Blomberg (talk) 11:30, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your reply on my discussion page. However, I don't find your argument, that the EU is the result of European history that goes further back than the creation of it, a valid reason for linking an article about Europe's history to the article about EU, especially not when the already linked History of the European Union explains that context in its first chapter. So, I'll remove the link again. Thomas Blomberg (talk) 15:34, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please read History of the European Union instead of just adding History of Europe. I'm sure you'll find that this covers everything that led up to the creation of the EU. Its first chapter links to the main article Ideas of European unity before 1945, which covers things like William Penn's proposal for a European Parliament in 1693, Abbot Charles de Saint-Pierre's proposal for a creation of a European league of 18 sovereign states in 1728, people like Marquis de La Fayette, Tadeusz Kościuszko, Wojciech Jastrzębowski and Victor Hugo, who wanted to create a United States of Europe from the late 1700s to well into the second half of the 1800s, etc. etc. In short, that article covers all the previous ideas of a European union. Some people like to see Napoleon's dream of Europe as something similar, but that's as absurd as the notion of the Roman Empire or the Holy Roman Empire being forerunners of the EU. If so, Hitler's Third Reich could also be included. A union must be voluntary, not the result of occupation. Thomas Blomberg (talk) 04:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Spain does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 00:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Elizium23 (talk) 00:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gothic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Market Garden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belgium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles V. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello BernadaAlba, Great job on your latest additions to Spain, I left everything you added, but I had to reverse only a few edits that were changing previous information or images. It would be great if you could post your suggestions for changes in the talk page first to allow discussion before changing previous content. I removed only one picture you added: Sant Climent de Taüll, because as far as I can tell is not a World Heritage Site. I did like how you ordered the monuments by ages, makes sense. And many of the good pictures and information you added. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:26, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

I guess we were both typing at the same time. ;) I agree with you, that the article is now better, please do check the changes, I only reverted a few. And we can talk in the discussion page about the others.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:30, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

My appologies, feel free to add it back, but I would make mention to Boí Valley in the caption.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 15:45, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

The edits I reversed and you re-reversed twice are all changes to previously existing content and can't be done without reaching consensus in the talk page first. Why should the picture of El Cid be removed? or that of Columbus landing?, or the Aqueduct of Segovia?. If other editors also think is a good idea then great. Its ok to add new quality content, but if you want to change what is in the article you should go through talk firs. If you want to include Tull, that is fine, but then you have to remove one of the other ones you added Cathedral of Burgos or El Escorial, because they don't all fit. I think both of them are more representative. If you would like to remove the Aqueduct or the walls of Avila, please request it in talk. Please do not reverse anymore before debating in talk as it would be considered edit warring. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

I think many of those arguments are good, why not post each argument to the talk page individually, I propose changing ... because ... . And after 2 or 3 days if no oposing arguments add the changes. I personally agree with most of them. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for understanding, and for your work. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:38, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

I like that idea, since the picture of Avila was added by me, go ahead and do the change, but if anybody challenges it, we need to go to the talk page. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:12, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Can you help me with the languages thing i am trying to change? I am trying to correct it putting the official language, the regional official langguages (that were missing) and then the partially recognized, but i am not being capable of doing it right. --BernardaAlba (talk) 17:16, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

I will give it a shot. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:47, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Still trying to improve it. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:16, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Since we can't add aditional sections into language, I added the regional languages below. Please check the talk page to see what you think about Occitan language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crystallizedcarbon (talk • contribs) 18:48, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Basque and Romanesque. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Talk:List of countries where Spanish is an official language were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved by another user. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:03, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Spanish art into Spain. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Juan López de Uralde has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gronk Oz (talk) 15:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please, stop adding random candidates to this article section without enough sourcing. Your additions for Teresa Rodríguez and Pablo Echenique are very poorly sourced. In no case do those sources say that either Rodríguez or Echenique are possible contenders for party leadership or to stand as Unidos Podemos candidates in the next general election (for Echenique you even added a source from 2014 (in fact, one that says that Echenique withdrawed his alternative-supported candidacies for Podemos' Assembly back in that year). You surely don't intend for us to take that seriously), and your additions for López de Uralde and Carmena are not sourced at all (Carmena is not even assured to run again as Madrid Mayor, much less as Unidos Podemos' Prime Minister candidate for the next election to take place between 2017 and 2020). Cheers. Impru20 (talk) 19:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cáceres. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tartessian and Phoenician. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francisco Serrano. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Natural park and Frías (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please add sources to the articles you create, such as Jueces de Castilla. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 12:19, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Enlightenment and Seneca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 25 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gothic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Copy of what I put in talk at those articles.

An identical copy of this substantial new section has just been placed in at least 5 articles. I think that this is good work that needs to be placed somewhere but placing 5 identical copies in 5 articles seems like a bad idea. Probably we should revert and ask them to just put it it in the most relevant article. BTW I plan to do the same with this post in all of those articles.  :-)

May I suggest that you pick the best place for this material, and self-revert the identical additions at other articles. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 00:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Would you please use the talk page before adding images to India. The images are curated by consensus and it is disruptive to add images that haven't gone through a consensus process. While we are at it, it is also disruptive to revert without using edit summaries or a discussion and doing such things is not a good prognosis for long term survival on Wikipedia. Best, --regentspark (comment) 15:27, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Peter1170. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Peter1170 (talk) 14:16, 13 October 2018 (CEST)

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with European Union. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Peter1170 (Peter1170) 14:16, 13 October 2018 (CEST)

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on India. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 16:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

He just made reverts again. Rocarus (talk) 12:38, 14 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Rocarus (talk) 12:31, 14 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Opposition Bloc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Russian in Ukraine

Ukrainian parliamentary election, 2019 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Russian in Ukraine

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Opposition Bloc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian in Ukraine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 24 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Green politics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social ecology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Dimsar01. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Eurovision Song Contest 2019, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Dimsar01 ^Talk ⌚→ 09:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 00:43, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

I would like to state for the record that the capitalization in my previous edit summary was for your benefit. Please discuss on the talk page before making any further edits. ―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 00:55, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, why you still doing unnecessary changes in the article about European Union? These edits are unconstructive and was reverted by many users. Another thing is, please start to use edit summary. When you edit a page, there is a small text entry field labeled Edit summary located under the main edit box. Its very helpful for other users to see, what kind of changes you did. Thank you. Peter1170 (talk) 20:19, 1 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baleares (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tragic Week.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Spain, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

 

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. If you want, you can copy the page's code to your sandbox and make all the changes there, and then bring it to the page. So there won't be so many consecutive edits that make it difficult to view the page's history. − Allice Hunter ^(Inbox) 20:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Next Generation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.. Subtropical-man (✉ | en-2) 09:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You are unreformable . You still break the rules of Wikipedia, first edit-warring, personal attacks, xenophobia, infringement of copyright and this time: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Meatpuppetry. If you do not stop such activities immediately, I think I will start the procedure of blocking your account indefinitely. Subtropical-man (✉ | en-2) 20:36, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply