Amaryllis25

Add a _ so that it reads User_talk:Amaryllis25 to make it correct, the current way doesn't link here Ctjf83

Thanks! Amaryllis25 ^{"Talk to me"} 22:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

P.S. Shes a bitch. I'm Eric Ladenthin you stupid whore.

You tagged Elizabeth Jane via as being against NPOV and the creator would like to know your reasoning. Please let them know at the talk page, here. Thanks! - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:48, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for sorting that out -i wasn't certain -it was here at the bottom that quite rightly made me think so. Cheers ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 10:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Was there some original version that actually had content instead of patent nonsense? I'll have to check the history but I'll say this. If it is posted again with legitimate content, then yes, I suggest AfD. If it gets posted with nonsense again, he gets a lovely vacation. If it gets posted under another similar name (I saw that they have at least one more account), then it'll get sent to the salt mines. Thanks you for the vigilance on the new pages! Cheers, CP 21:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

That's the third time I've deleted that page. The earlier two revisions were blatant attack pages, so there's no need to prod it. If you see it again, you can speedy it. Thanks for your continued vigilance! Cheers, CP 18:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Greetings from the League of Copyeditors. Your name is listed on our members page, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the members page to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the new requests system, which has replaced the old /proofreading subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial backlog which still exists there. The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both old and new. While FA and GA reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Wikipedia's highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing, The League of Copyeditors.

Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 18:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Template:User financial aid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

My tag was correct, this is not a recreation of another wiki project, it is just a lady jabbering in Dutch. Beach drifter (talk) 18:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The tag is confusing. I wish there was one for just non-english stuff as well. Beach drifter (talk) 18:33, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

My name is Brenton Stewart. I am an African American, doctoral student at the University of Wisconsin- Madison in Library & Information Studies. Currently I am conducting a study on the motivational factors of African American Wikipedians. I am asking for your help by participating in this short online survey which will take take approximately 5 minutes to complete. Please feel free to distribute to other Black Wikipedians. The survey will be available from Tuesday July 1, 2008 until Tuesday August 5, 2008. Thank you so much for your participation.

Survey is here: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=HlzQGQIRUjncj7O09zgy4g_3d_3d —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emelian1977 (talk • contribs) 06:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Amaryllis25! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:01, 25 October 2011 (UTC).Reply

Hi Amaryllis25,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply