CharlieMehta

Hi CGGCA201! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --🐦DrWho42👻 12:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I am truly grateful to be a part of Wikipedia, and I am eager to contribute and make a positive impact in any way I can. Thank you for your warm welcome and for sharing important tutorials and links. Your kindness will always be remembered. CGGCA201 (talk) 12:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Dl2000. I noticed that you recently removed content from K. N. Pandita without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dl2000 (talk) 17:46, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

I saw you struck your comments on a couple if discussions on advice from Liz. Thanks for that. For note, however, there is a neutral way to bring the attention of the discussion closer to the fact that a Single Purpose Account is contributing to a discussion. Have a read of Wikipedia:Single-purpose account. You can use the subst per the instructions there when, as here, a new user comes in and starts !voting on deletion discussions without having any other other edits. Just something to bear in mind in the future. Take care, and happy editing. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Sirfurboy Thank you for sharing this important tutorial on SPA. At the moment, I find myself overwhelmed by the multitude of Wikipedia rules. I believe I require some time to process and internalize them. CGGCA201 (talk) 08:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oh yes, we all do. But don't worry, new editors in good faith are given plenty of latitude as they become acquainted with the rules and guidelines. Good to see you here. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Dahoru. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Adani Group have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Also requesting to explain, which policy has been violated Dahoru (talk) 05:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Including earnings reports in the lede is not relevant. Refer WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Charlie (talk) 05:36, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@User:CharlieMehta Thank you for responding. I have thoroughly reviewed the policy and believe that the information I provided meets the criteria for encyclopedic value. The policy says, In order to ensure encyclopedic value, it is important to provide data in context with explanations that are referenced to independent sources. I have taken utmost care to incorporate this requirement into the content I provided. Additionally, I have included the relevant references to support the information presented. Considering the above, I kindly request you to clarifying why you believe the content violates the policy? Dahoru (talk) 06:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, after waiting for your reply I have reverted your edits. I have cited sources that establish the policy as per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. If you think the edit is not constructive you can start discussion here Talk:Adani Group. Requesting to not revert the edit again without any proper explanation. Thank You. Dahoru (talk) 16:40, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Dahoru I have previously addressed your concern, citing the relevant rule. To delve deeper into this matter, kindly navigate to your talk page, where you can provide a response at your convenience. Charlie (talk) 18:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@User:CharlieMehta Thanks for your response, I will request you to understand what Wikipedia actually is. It's not just about updating negative things on the page, what exactly you are doing. It's a platform that strives to provide neutral and unbiased information to its readers. So, before you jump to conclusions and make changes, please take a moment to grasp this concept. It is not a tool for personal biases or agendas. However, I must remind you that Wikipedia is not controlled by any single individual or biased perspective. So, If you have any issues or concerns with the content, I kindly request that you discuss them on the talk page. It's always better to have a discussion and consider other editors' points of view. Dahoru (talk) 18:37, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello! This material is very poorly written, nearly useless, and borderline unintelligible. Consensus is for this hot garbage to not be included – especially not within the lede (MOS trumps you). If you want it in: you'll need to hammer it out on article Talk. Further attempts to shoehorn it without consensus after PP was lifted will be reported swiftly(-ish) to AIV; so you better really hammer it out first… Good luck, and Happy Trails! -- dsprc ^[talk] 12:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, CharlieMehta,

This is a request to please change your signature that you used to sign your messages or AFD reports. Right now, both your User page and talk page show up as green links. This means that you have directed editors to a Redirect page rather than your actual User pages. I'm not sure why you are doing this unless you have changed your username recently but it would be better to just have a regular signature that includes your username and direct links, especially to your User talk page. You can access your Signature options through your Preferences. Thank you for seeing to this. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Also, do you have any connection to editor DJ InstaMalik? They are a new editor who has commented on all of your AFDs which is highly unusual. If they are an alternative account of yours, please declare this on your User page and do not have them editing to support your position in deletion discussions. Without a disclosure, this could look an awful lot like sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry if they are an associate of yours. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Liz Thank you for informing me about the signature issue. I have corrected it following your instructions. Also, I want to clarify that I have no affiliation with DJ InstaMalik. However, it appears that this account is attempting to comment on all the AfDs I've recently nominated. Interestingly, on one specific page, the same account copied text from Bajaj Finance's page, which I had contributed, and pasted it onto Sanjiv Bajaj, the founder's page. I have already reversed the changes in good faith. Charlie (talk) 07:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023

• Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
• Tech tip: Library access methods

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, CharlieMehta,

Your draftification was reverted. Please ensure you have read WP:DRAFTIFY thoroughly, and follow the guidelines on when draftification is an appropriate action to take and when other alternatives should be pursued. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Liz, Sorry. I made a mistake because I got mixed up by how the quality of the article at the top of the page was shown ("An unassessed article from Wikipedia"). I will not repeat this again. Charlie (talk) 14:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Arak Oil Refinery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arak. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023

• Three new partners
• Google Scholar integration
• How to track partner suggestions

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. may I ask what is wrong with the page thet made you move it to a draft? explananing your acts can halp me to fixs what ever you feel needs to be corected, but whithout one I dont see who one can know what is needed to be done. Pen Man (talk) 10:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @איש עיטי Thank you for getting in touch. I have just responded on Sanjeev Singla's draft talk page. Charlie (talk) 15:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024

• Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
• 1Lib1Ref results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Just a quick thank-you for your enthusiastic and careful editing; it's great to have your contributions! Klbrain (talk) 09:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Klbrain Thanks for being patient and understanding. I am just trying to learn the basics. Charlie (talk) 12:37, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dear Charlie Mehta On what grounds you want to delete this page or wanted to nominate to delete it?? Everything was well sourced and with upto the mark citation please help us to understand or justify your point. If you don't consider leading news paper then help us with the example of right sources

Please help or restore the page as per 20th March 24 FrankoSayHi5 (talk) 18:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, CharlieMehta. Thank you for your work on Lonuziyaaraiy Park. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@SunDawn Thank you. It's great to hear that you have reviewed my article. Wishing you and your family a wonderful and blessed day too. Charlie (talk) 12:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, CharlieMehta. Thank you for your work on Institute of Petroleum Safety, Health and Environment Management. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Needs work to make the text more explanatory. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@North8000 Thank you. Charlie (talk) 17:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi CharlieMehta, thank you for your work on E-ShodhSindhu. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of our new pages patrol and left the following comment:

A brief article on a relatively new body; the history of the former consortia it was formed from could well be used to develop this page further.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 08:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Klbrain Agreed and Noted. Thanks. Charlie (talk) 17:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024

• IEEE and Haaretz now available
• Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
• Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

An article which I have recently created, Turning Point: The Bomb And The Cold War, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved my own draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where I can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When I feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, I will move it back or submit it for a review. Charlie (talk) 05:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Turning Point The Bomb And The Cold War.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi CharlieMehta, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 22:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Just Step Sideways Thank you for approving autopatroller rights. I have just set up the Rater and StubSorter scripts. Let me take some time to familiarize myself with them, and then I will definitely consider applying for the NPP. Charlie (talk) 05:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi CharlieMehta, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! – Joe (talk) 06:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Charlie (talk) 03:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

You should probably consider slowing down in your speedy tagging. For example, WP:G5 does not apply just because a page was created by a blocked user. I've removed two G5 tags of yours.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:38, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Slowing down. Let me go back and check the recent G5 tagged articles I marked, review them, and remove the tag. Thank you for the advice. Sorry, I got a bit carried away. Charlie (talk) 16:50, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi CharlieMehta,

I noticed that you moved my article, "Arab Bank Maroc," to Draft:Arab Bank Maroc. Could you please explain the reasons for this action? I would like to understand any issues with the article so that I can address them effectively. Thank you for your guidance and assistance. Best regards, Adil Faouzi (talk) 11:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Adil, please ensure that the page meets the WP:NCORP, WP:ORGCRIT guidelines and includes at least three references according to WP:RSP. You can refer to few bank pages and use them as standard templates - Arab Bank , Bank Al-Maghrib etc. Charlie (talk) 16:58, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Charlie, I hope you are doing well. I suggest using the MoveToDraft tool whenever you need to draftify articles. It will automate the process for you, including notifying the creator with the specific reason behind the draftification, which was not done when you moved this article. GrabUp - Talk 03:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Grabup I am doing well, thank you. I hope you are doing great too! I just installed the MoveToDraft tool like you suggested. Thanks for the tip and for helping me out. Lately, I goofed up with the NPP review. I am taking a step back and seeking some assistance to learn. If I find it to be too overwhelming, I am going to surrender my NPP rights and get back to basic editing. Charlie (talk) 04:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your reply and I am also doing well. Your NPP reviews seem good, but your CSDs, especially G5, are problematic. I suggest you continue reviewing but learn more about CSDs before tagging. GrabUp - Talk 05:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 63, May – June 2024

• One new partner
• 1Lib1Ref
• Spotlight: References check

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I want to thank you for reviewing my draft, it had been pending for a while.

You declined my submission for this draft stating a copyright issue. However, the contents of the page you mentioned are licensed under GODL which is accepted as a copyright free license on Wikipedia.

Some additional questions:
1. How did you arrive at the % overlap figure?
2. How do I become a reviewer of drafts that other people have created? Skratata69 (talk) 18:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Skratata69 Thanks to you for creating this draft. From what I understand, it's okay to use GODL for images and diagrams on Wikimedia Commons. For text, it needs to be free of copyright from wherever it comes from. I might be wrong, so I suggest you ask about this at WT:AFC. Answers to additional questions; If you want to check your draft for copyright overlap, please use this tool: https://copyvios.toolforge.org/ and to become an reviewer of drafts, visit: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Participants. Charlie (talk) 01:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Skratata69, you do not qualify to become a reviewer. You do not have a sufficient number of edits. I suspect you're not qualified for other reasons as well, but no need to go into that.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, was just asking since there seems to be a huge backlog Skratata69 (talk) 04:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I will ask a question there Skratata69 (talk) 04:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please delete that material, and ask for a CV-revdel.

When reviewing and declining as a copyvio but not flagging the entire draft for deletion, the decline box has a big red banner. This means we, the declining reviewers, have work to do before we move on. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I will make this work my top priority this weekend. Charlie (talk) 17:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

In case this is about my draft, please don't delete my draft yet. I worked hard on it and there isn't a clear copyright vio (yet) Skratata69 (talk) 18:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please don't worry, I will not get your draft deleted. However, it does need some trimming to conclude my review. Charlie (talk) 18:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Skratata69 It was a general comment to guide Charlie for the future in case they were unaware. I'm sure they were. loads to know al at once when entering a new area.

Charlie - the AFC decline parameter "cv" shoudl go to 'cv-cleaned" once you have done whatever you need and requested cv-revdel.

Good to meet you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:59, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

If it helps, I've just looked at the CV report]. It appears to me that the words copied are technical terms which cannot be rewritten without altering the meaning. While not exactly a false positive I think this may well not be a copyvio. You may disagree. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:10, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Timtrent Nice to meet you. I revised the page and lowered the plagiarism percentage from 33% to 18%. I also added a "further reading" section at Draft:Sovereign_Gold_Bond. Since the draft was rejected again, should I request a CV-revdel? Charlie (talk) 02:43, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I almost never take the percentage as a guide. I use the CV detector tool and examine what the duplicated words are. Looking at this draft I can see that most are strings of words that cannot reasonably be changed. Actual names for things trigger the detector, and these are, in the main, actual names for things.

What I would do is to look at your previous decline, and change the cv parameter to cv-cleaned, and treat it then as "job done", because I cannot see anything to delete/hide. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I should rephrase that. I use the percentage to tell me it is worth my effort to redact. >50% is likely to be worthwhile, <50% less likely. <40% unlikely 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:25, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

thanks for creating the article Nahid Islam X (talk) 18:53, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Xoak Thanks. Charlie (talk) 09:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I've moved this to Draft:Nahid Islam. It would appear to be a controversial topic and needs an independent review. Could you please work on it there? It may need to be protected. Deb (talk) 08:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Deb Hi Deb, I just saw your message. I have also been noticing that the page has been losing its neutrality and drifting away from its original purpose. I appreciate you moving it to draft, but it has been moved back to the mainspace through AfC. Should I move it back to draft, or would you prefer to handle it and add a move restriction? Charlie (talk) 15:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I'll do it. Deb (talk) 17:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Nahid Islam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. C F A 💬 15:45, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @CharlieMehta, the page I created for The Morning Context was put back into drafts for better sourcing, lack of neutral language, and better structuring. I'd like to understand the issue(s) better so I can improve the article and can use the information for future ones I write. Thanks! SageRoot29 (talk) 12:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@SageRoot29 Thank you for making the draft and showing that you're willing to work on it. To improve it further, use trustworthy and reliable sources, like well-known publications and independent references. Make sure the language is neutral and objective, avoiding any promotional tone, and keep the descriptions balanced and based on facts. Also, follow a clear structure typically used in Wikipedia articles, refer WP:MOS, to present the information logically and coherently. Charlie (talk) 04:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello User:CharlieMehta. I hope you are fine. I created an article Tasha K. Take a look and review it. I need know if I am on the right track here. Best. Laurengoldstreet (talk) 23:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC) .Reply

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 2024-09-11 00:00:00. For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 11:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi charlie Mehta, Can you please tell me why are you in favour of deleting Gurukripa Career Institute Page. I am not getting why u felt that it is promotional. Mike20008 (talk) 09:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

• Charlie, just a heads up: I filed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Skajlajjn1996‎.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Seems, Charlie, that you kicked over a sock drawer. Bbb23 thanks for filing the SPI 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  @Bbb23 Thank you. I had my doubts, but I chose not to mention them as puppets in order to preserve the necessary civility in our communication.

  @Timtrent I am @DreamRimmer's student at NPP School. I am simply doing my best to learn as much as I can from them. Charlie (talk) 14:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You have a good person to learn from. It's always good to find (your first?) sock drawer, even if you weren't the one to file the SPI. You're walking a good road. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 64, July – August 2024

• The Hindu Group joins The Wikipedia Library
• Wikimania presentation
• New user script for easily searching The Wikipedia Library

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello @CharlieMehta - thank you for looking over the Rose Betts page that I have been working on. You left a 'citations needed' tag, which I didn't understand at first, but now realise was a prompt to see if there are any other reliable sources, to strengthen the case for notability. I have now found several new sources - including two independent UK 'BBC' sources, and hope that this will help resolve any uncertainty. Thank you Chaiten1 (talk) 18:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Chaiten1 I put the tag due to my ongoing NPP school training, where Rose Betts' page has been chosen as part of the assignment. I apologise for not putting an appropriate edit summary. Charlie (talk) 06:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

No problem at all, thank you! Chaiten1 (talk) 06:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NLC Dolly Gunj Solar Power Plant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NLC Dolly Gunj Solar Power Plant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thewikizoomer (talk) 16:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roche Caiman Power Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roche Caiman Power Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thewikizoomer (talk) 16:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your accusation of being an alleged paid editor may be taken up at appropriate forums as per policies. Your comment. Also understand that AfD pages are not meant to have discussions that don't belong there. You're welcome to discuss any of my actions that may have not been in line with the policies of Wikipedia.

Also understand and learn to assume good faith. Thewikizoomer (talk) 17:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

You seem to be trying to discuss about me being a paid editor on Afd page here. As said earlier, understand that AfD pages are not a place for that and the accusation although false, maybe taken up at appropriate forum. Thewikizoomer (talk) 17:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Thewikizoomer This is not meant as a personal attack. If it came across that way, I am sorry for it. However, your edit history is fully accessible. I sincerely wish you the best and hope you approach things more constructively and with a clear mind. Charlie (talk) 04:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, I have over 5000 edits on Wikipedia, I have created and edited lots of articles, all this, because I like improving articles, I like editing on Wikipedia. Just because you didn't like some of the edits of mine, you can't simply call me a undisclosed paid editor.

Also I have proposed merger of many PSUs too for ex. DFCCIL, ent. articles: Jabardast and lot more.

I have edited IndiGo, Akasa, DPDPA-2023, Power Grid, Vijayawada Airport, Gudivada, Vijayawada, Visakhapatnam Railway station, Vijayawada railway station, governors in India, Odisha, NIFT, US presidential election 2024, so did they all pay me or something. Don't accuse someone of being a paid editor unless ypu have a solid evidence of such activity. I edit random pages because I like wikipedia editing and not because I'm paid or anything.

My edit history speaks for myself, I follow policies, be civil and assume good faith. Hence it felt like a personal attack. Thewikizoomer (talk) 08:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Also regarding the NTPC merger, after recent merger of NIFT articles, I decided to nominate NTPC stations for merging. Because even POWER GRID has lots of substations, but every station is notable, so it's done as part of my daily random editing and nothing else. Note that I'm active in prodding and AFDing articles which don't meet the criteria and I'm still new here when compared to more regular users here, so I'm learning just like you. Thewikizoomer (talk) 08:17, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Power stations and sub-stations are two different things all together. Anyway, thanks for dropping in and wishing you all the best. Charlie (talk) 10:24, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi CharlieMehta, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 65, September – October 2024

• Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Wikipedia Library
• Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
• Tech tip: Mass downloads

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey,

You've created this.

Thank you, that's what I asked for; that if a translated topic is deleted, then at least there's a consensus about that.

BTW, can I also vote? IdanST (talk) 07:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@IdanST You are welcome, dear. Certainly, you can vote. Please provide individual citations regarding the IWI Galil Sniper. All that's needed is substantial evidence explaining how the sniper rifle differs from the main gun. Charlie (talk) 07:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply