Wikipedical

 

Hello, Wikipedical. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is wikipedia email - Newspapers.com.
Message added 23:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 23:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Monument Valley 2, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 18:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please make sure to cleanup up the links to the old page. @Amakuru: As info. -- ferret (talk) 18:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hopefully the WP:DISAMBIGPROJECT will come along and sort these out soon!  — Amakuru (talk) 21:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

• See User talk:Anthony Appleyard#Request to revert undiscussed move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Airtel digital TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Multiplex, Topper, ETC, Prime News, Masti, ETV 2, Paras and Peace of Mind

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, The Opposition with Jordan Klepper, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

PRehse (talk) 11:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The One Percent (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The One Percent (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Radiphus 22:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 01:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

One piece in the NYT and one in Roll Call is hardly "significant coverage". Especially since it is not over time, but only in the context of a political campaign that he has not won (because it hasn't happened yet). I created that as a redirect because that's the appropriate way to handle this. I do not want to take this to AfD but I will if you don't self-revert it back into a redirect. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:45, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Significant coverage" refers to the depth of coverage, not the number of articles. Those two long profiles certainly establish notability. Even having said that, a quick peek at Google News shows that there's a good deal of coverage about Greg Pence – and not just mere mentions. Moreover, per WP:NTEMP: "once a topic has been the subject of significant coverage in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage." So it does not matter that he hasn't received coverage "over time." I believe that the article currently satisfies notability guidelines and should be improved rather than deleted. If you still have concerns, you should bring the article to AfD. -- Wikipedical (talk) 16:03, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Paramount Pictures logo (2013).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Wikipedical. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac (talk) 01:40, 9 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Escape at Dannemora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brett Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

I've restored yet again the perfectly valid prodcodes per the cc.com site. If you want to remove prodcodes go take a look and the completely unreferenced and incorrect ones at List of Teachers (2016 TV series) episodes. Also that article is completely not keeping with the standard practice of leaving ratings below millions unrounded. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 22:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. I saw you moved List of Super Bowl champions back in 2012 (and immediately reverted yourself). Your edit summary: "Not just winners, a list of games" makes a lot of sense. I've been thinking about it and the page probably should be moved to List of Super Bowls as the list is very much about more than just the champions; it includes information about Super Bowl participants, stadiums, cities, attendance, etc.. Before I open a move request on the talk page I figured I would ask you if you had any specific rationale for moving it back that I should take into consideration?

Thanks, - Paul^T+/_C 19:19, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Originally posted to my talk page. Moved here to keep the discussion all in one place. I hope you don't mind.

Hey there. I believed (and believe) the name should be moved – because the lists describe much more than just the winners/'champions' – but as I recall I noticed there are many, many other similar pages like List of NBA champions, List of Stanley Cup champions, List of Wimbledon gentlemen's singles champions, etc. So a much larger naming conventions discussion should be initiated instead of a single page move. -- Wikipedical (talk) 16:20, 22 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure that a huge discussion beyond something at the talk page of the article is necessary. Just because those other pages exist doesn't mean that they necessarily dictate anything an the Super Bowl page. Unless, is there specific MOS guidance on the topic? I'm not aware of anything that might be relevant. - Paul^T+/_C 03:59, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I don't know of any MOS discussion, but noticing that consistency exists with other articles was my rationale for moving it back. -- Wikipedical (talk) 17:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Deadwood film. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled Deadwood film redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ah! Then how to link TikTok profiles to list? List of most-followed Instagram accounts have same format. -- CptViraj (📧) 14:06, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Joker (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Joker (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

For the WDSMP note, it will only be included on the bottom of the page, it will not disrupt from the labeled distributor of the film by 20CF or whoever else, please try to come to some compromise that will allow the mention WDSMP note on the page. The case for 20CF is different from that of Universal or WB, as their owners don’t operate film divisions, for Disney, they have a distribution system that can easily be listed as a small note in the notes section and still allow 20CF to be listed in the primary section. 184.54.163.113 (talk) 03:32, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

I agree with your OP statement about my comment about it possibly being filmed already. But I would just tell you the film is listed on the Industry standard website IMDB PRO(a valid professional source) as specifically in Pre-production(preparing for filming) with an official Teaser Poster(uploaded just 3 days ago) and logo supplied by the production company. Meaning that it is not in "development hell"(as that is listed on site as "in development") but has in fact been greenlit and is an active film production looking to begin filming with a projected April(/Easter) 2021 release date and an estimated(from the Script) runtime of 167mins.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5795232/

So it is indeed an active film project, and not stuck in development. It's mainly slightly too early(like 6 months really) for a film page just yet. I hope you don't take it the wrong way, just telling you the film is indeed a real legit production with an official projected release date.Colliric (talk) 07:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

• User:Colliric, Imdb is generally not considered a reliable source but is used as an external link. Moreover, a film's listing supplied by its own production company is not independent of the subject. Notability is recognized by significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Plus, as WP:NFF notes, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles." -- Wikipedical (talk) 19:18, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Found this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Archive_74#Revisit_on_RfC

--172.58.99.162 (talk) 18:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, 2020 in television, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:19, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

• Hi User:CASSIOPEIA, I'm a little confused- 2020 in television is purely a disambiguation page and no different than 2019 in television. -- Wikipedical (talk) 19:04, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Wikipedical, In mainspace now. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 22:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Deuce.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:The Good Fight#About the lead section. — YoungForever^(talk) 16:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

The same editor is back to restore his or her edits for nth time without discussion. — YoungForever^(talk) 17:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your edit here but please don't insert headers with the same name unless it's somehow necessary. That is confusing for MediaWiki software and (e.g.) if you are trying to make an anchor to one of those sections, it's needlessly cumbersome. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:New60minutes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Run (upcoming TV series). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 6#Run (upcoming TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 22:07, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Lost task force/Archive 2. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 7#Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Lost task force/Archive 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 20:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Lost task force/Archive 1. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 7#Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Lost task force/Archive 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 20:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please don't do this. ‎ WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE says don't link into the article body from the infobox, and Template:Infobox television says only put a list article (a separate article) into that parameter. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 13:48, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Peter Gould (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Big Time.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:32, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:50, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Horace Mann School seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Somebody Somewhere (TV series). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 15#Somebody Somewhere (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Narky Blert (talk) 08:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thank you for your message. I agree that some shows might benefit from such a column if the episode is mostly centered around them, but Euphoria only uses prologues to explore a particular character's past and these only last a few minutes, so I'm still not convinced this is a beneficial contribution to the article. We could open a discussion on the talk page, though, and see what other contributors think. I would personally remove the featured character from the bottom note section as well, because it's already blatantly obvious from the first sentence of the summary. --TheVampire (talk) 13:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Wikipedical,

I was looking over some articles you PROD'd and noticed that you didn't post notifications of the deletion tagging on the article creator's talk page. Please do so in the future. Most editors and admins do this by making use of Twinkle to tag articles for all types of deletion. Once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", then Twinkle will post these notices on your behalf which makes things easy. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:46, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Scenes from a Marriage (upcoming miniseries) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 30#Scenes from a Marriage (upcoming miniseries) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 23:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Wikipedical,

Regarding Cải lương, if you are fixing a bad page move, you often want to leave a redirect behind, not because it makes for a good redirect but because by not leaving a redirect, you create a lot of broken redirects as you can see here. Unfortunately, Wikipedia bots are very swift and when an editor or vandal moves an article to a bad title, all of the existing redirects to that article are changed to point to the new, bad title. If you leave a redirect behind when you move it back to the correct name, then the bots can fix all of these double redirects to point to the correct target again. When you don't leave a redirect behind, then any existing redirects show up on our broken redirect lists. So, I have created a temporary redirect from the bad title to Cải lương. We can always tag this redirect later for speedy deletion once the double redirects are corrected.

The best way to avoid this happening is to check "What links here" before moving an article. If there are a lot of redirects to the page, then leave a redirect behind or you can choose to manually fix all of the redirects yourself. If there are no redirects to the article, then you needn't leave a redirect behind when you are correcting for a bad page move. Thank you for all of your work on the project! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Albert Einstein has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Federalist Papers has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:05, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

McCarthyism has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:New60minutes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Where is my hatnote? You didn't merely move it. You deleted it.

If you don't reverse this action, I will create a disambiguation page, whether it is desirable or not.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:45, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

The previous hatnote no longer applies at In the News because In the Know no longer redirects there. Instead, I added a hatnote to In the Know. And your latter comment seems a little aggressive, remaining civil would be appreciated, thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 17:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

In The Know did still redirect there, so I didn't realize what was taking place. But you didn't make clear where you moved the hatnote to, so I didn't consider that. Sorry.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Arrested Development has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of deal of the day services is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of deal of the day services (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evil (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paramount. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Do you mind reverting the move to NOBULL? Not only was an RM just open earlier today, but it's been moved before and been contested at WP:RMT (permalink). I would undo it, but I thought I'd ask first to avoid move warring. Thanks! Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 15:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 17:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Brown v. Board of Education has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Tall Tales of Jim Bridger, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tall Tales of Jim Bridger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article List of Arrested Development cast members has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to and WP:FORK of List of Arrested Development characters

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --woodensuperman 14:49, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Arrested Development cast members is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Arrested Development cast members until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--woodensuperman 11:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can you please remove the episodes of The Busy World of Richard Scarry and move them to a different page? 2601:1C1:837F:EFE0:69AB:5A:49F8:B446 (talk) 15:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Wikipedical. I think you are favoring the term 'miniseries' in the discussion at WP:RMTR. If so, do you want to respond to the latest comment? EdJohnston (talk) 19:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Joseph McCarthy has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:12, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply