Talk:Learjet

 

Image:Logo learjet.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:27, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Image:Logo learjet.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thought I would add that little piece of info about how the learjet is mentioned in the song "Money". Main point is that it's pop culture. Bending Unit (talk) 05:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC) Bending UnitReply

Am I allowed to say "WTF" on Wikipedia? Can we remove this and the rest of the masturbatory statement? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.178.41 (talk) 11:12, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Particularly the first paragraph sounds as if it were straight from a corporate PR brochure. Can this be cleaned up and reduced (or maybe expanded?!) to just the facts, please? Stizzleswick (talk) 02:13, 10 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

According to the page linked in 'Marvel', it was a 60's era STOL -prop- aircraft, with roots in the 50s. How can the early lear designs be based on it if lear was started in the 1940s? Furthermore, this page says that jets were subbed in for turboshafts, but the Marvel only had one turbo-prop-engine (nitpicky, I know, but still). Of course, it makes mention of the ducting for the prop, but the timing is still screwy, especially since the article says Lear got the new design out in the early 60's, right around when the Marvel test bed was built, let alone the actual thing. Exactly what does the listed source say for this? Is it supposed to mean that Lear was originally going to go with a ducted-prop-driven-from-a-turbo design that was perhaps floating around in the 40s and (definitely) 50s? 76.251.164.216 (talk) 02:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

What aircraft do you refer to? Ruslik_Zero 20:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

I think the phrase "in the 40s..." is somewhat editorial in nature and probably doesn't belong here, for reasons beyond the timeline confusion it has obviously created. So, I'm going to delete it. JohnDWashington (talk) 21:11, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Learjet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080304165234/http://www.yearoflearjet.com/ to http://www.yearoflearjet.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080414213444/http://www.learjet85.com/ to http://www.learjet85.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Learjet Bombardier. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 13:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

if this aircraft is "based on" something else, could that something else be expanded somewhat? to what extent is it copied/elaborated on it? many years ago i met someone with paper engineer drawings og something very similar, and he confided that the jet nearly was called studerjet after some swiss designer/engineer. No idea if that is true, but seeing it has swiss roots brought up this memory. 193.143.240.100 (talk) 20:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC)Reply