Talk:Jamsheed Marker

The changes I have made do no more than remedy a lamentably one sided account which suppresses the urgent, and well documented, questions about Marker's role in East Timor. For "Ross" to delete them is no more than partisan censorship. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bangkokesque (talk • contribs) 15:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

And yet when I added them back, you deleated your own posts. Maybe before reverting, you actually read the article --RossF18 (talk) 15:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Further, balancing is too be applauded, not deleated. However, until the added balancing comments are sourced, they either carry the "to be sourced" tag (which in good faith will remain) or as is often the policy, unsourced claims are deleated. I did not subscribe to the policy of automatic deleation of unsourced claims, but neither should you deleat sourced claims even if you disagree with them. Add sourced alternative views if you must, but do not deleat sourced points of view simply because you disagree. --RossF18 (talk) 15:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

The background stuff about East Timor is irrelevant here; it's well covered on other pages. My additions are sourced - now by page number. The web site of the university which employs Marker isn't an independent source. I haven't deleted any sourced claims. The word "delete" is not spelled "deleate" or "deleat". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bangkokesque (talk • contribs) 15:48, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Looks much better now that you've sourced your claims. Although now academic, you did remove the sourced East Timor background information without discussion. It's fine, but let's not kid ourselves about you not removing sourced parts of the article without discussion. Lets keep in mind that you also removed much of the header, which was sourced in one of the top newspapers in the nation. This is not a legal proceeding and hersay rules do not apply, especially when sourced by leading newspapers. Please do no delete things you disagree with (and I'm not talking about the irrelevant East Timor "stuff.") Also, thanks for the spelling lesson. --RossF18 (talk) 17:32, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

The following seems to be very peacockish...

However, some journalists reporting the East Timor referendum regarded Marker as excessively indulgent towards Indonesian officials, military and police officers who would go on to play key roles in the deadly violence inflicted on the territory after the vote for independence.

Who is "*some* journalists"? - I only see Parry's reference. Thus, I suggest the above be deleted or heavily edited and limited to facts. --Merbabu (talk) 22:36, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

PS, I’ve since decided to remove it for now. It can be reinstated if it is shown that it is indeed “some journalists”, and not just Parry. I am suspicious the phrase in this instance is based on Parry’s specific comments alone (which I have of course left in the article). --Merbabu (talk) 22:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jamsheed Marker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20130118064926/http://www.bluechipmag.com/bc/content_detail.php?content=681 to http://www.bluechipmag.com/bc/content_detail.php?content=681
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081203171337/http://www.eckerd.edu/academics/irga/faculty/marker.php to http://www.eckerd.edu/academics/irga/faculty/marker.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jamsheed Marker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160306011046/http://ashacentre.org/index.php/about/inspirational-women/item/106-arnaz-marker to http://ashacentre.org/index.php/about/inspirational-women/item/106-arnaz-marker

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply