Talk:Hilston Park

The text and the info box are quite clear that date of completion was 1838. I do not have a copy of that volume of Bradney to check, but the article also says "on 12 September 1838, the house was destroyed by fire." Was such a large project as this really undertaken and completed in less than four months? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hilston Park/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gilderien (talk · contribs) 21:00, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'll start this within 72 hours.

Initial thoughts... Well, its obviously not a quick fail, no tags, copyvios, etc. "reported to have lived here at one time"? By whom? Is there a reference for this? All the other references seem reliable, although ref 4, on page 672 does not mention the words "Hilston Park", according to Google books, though I am willing to AGF that it is a different edition. Prose is readable, GA standard but not nearly FA. Any ref for it becoming a school? Also, could you find some images of the grounds et. al, and also, definitely need a citation for the fact it is an SSSI, mentioned twice with no reference.

--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 13:32, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ref added for SSSI. Lead doesn't have to be cited, so only once.. The fire in ref 4 is mentioned here.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:39, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Okay thanks. I'll have a look on commons for some images.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 14:20, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

There aren't any, I looked of course.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

As did I. I'll formally evaluate the criteria tomorrow.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:02, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

One quick point I forgot to say, why is it a SSSI, and since when, etc?--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 14:21, 10 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ooo just found more info on the CADW page. It mentions the reason and the review was done in 1990 so presumably this is the date. Actually can you review this later this evening I've found info on the grounds which could improve this in the meantime.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:26, 10 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

...Okay, probably. Just give me a ping.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 14:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:  

   B. MoS compliance:  

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:  

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  

   C. No original research:  

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:   and much better, good expansion regarding the grounds.

   B. Focused:  

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:   No problems here.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:  

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:  

All Done.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 15:51, 10 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Have alerted the MONMOUTHPEDIA folk to try to get somebody to take images. No more on geograph or flickr.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hilston Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415154601/http://www.gwentoutdoorcentres.org.uk/Hilston_Park.html to http://www.gwentoutdoorcentres.org.uk/Hilston_Park.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120609053555/http://www.gwentoutdoorcentres.org.uk/aboutus.html to http://www.gwentoutdoorcentres.org.uk/aboutus.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304061956/http://www.coflein.gov.uk/pdf/CPG275/ to http://www.coflein.gov.uk/pdf/CPG275/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply