Talk:Escalera's bat

[1] Ucucha 22:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:Myotis escalerai/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk) 00:58, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Criteria:

1. Well-written:
 

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;  and

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. 

2. Verifiable with no original research:
 

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; 

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);  and

(c) it contains no original research. 

3. Broad in its coverage:
 

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;  and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). 

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  This, and all of the above, with a few changes I made, checks off easily! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 01:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  Very stable. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 01:09, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  All good. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 01:08, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content;   and

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. 

This article passed! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 01:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2011.08.010 Ucucha (talk) 23:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The second sentence of the lead is a problem. The first part of the sentence, and the rest, don't fit together. Since I'm not sure if there's a missing word or some other problem, I don't dare touch it. Would someone who knows what it's trying to say give it a look, please? - Denimadept (talk) 04:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

It looks okay to me. You might have to read it through a second time so all of the clauses come together in your mind. 130.156.3.254 (talk) 14:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Myotis escalerai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101105215033/http://www.eurobats.org/documents/pdf/MoP6/record_MoP6/MoP6.Record.Annex5-Res.6.2-AmendmentAnnex.pdf to http://www.eurobats.org/documents/pdf/MoP6/record_MoP6/MoP6.Record.Annex5-Res.6.2-AmendmentAnnex.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727101928/http://www.museugranollersciencies.org/latela_media/museu/pdf/quiropters/Flaquer_etal_Galemys22_29_61.pdf to http://www.museugranollersciencies.org/latela_media/museu/pdf/quiropters/Flaquer_etal_Galemys22_29_61.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726042014/http://www.eurobats.org/documents/pdf/National_Reports/nat_rep_Fr_2010.pdf to http://www.eurobats.org/documents/pdf/National_Reports/nat_rep_Fr_2010.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726042035/http://www.eurobats.org/documents/pdf/AC15_StC4/Doc_StC4_AC15_12_Rev1_DraftResolution_6_2_AmendmentAnnex.pdf to http://www.eurobats.org/documents/pdf/AC15_StC4/Doc_StC4_AC15_12_Rev1_DraftResolution_6_2_AmendmentAnnex.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726042055/http://www.eurobats.org/documents/pdf/National_Reports/nat_rep_Por_2010.pdf to http://www.eurobats.org/documents/pdf/National_Reports/nat_rep_Por_2010.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100629174024/http://www.isciii.es/htdocs/centros/epidemiologia/boletin_semanal/bes0834.pdf to http://www.isciii.es/htdocs/centros/epidemiologia/boletin_semanal/bes0834.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply