Talk:Creamy layer

This definition from "Sattanathan Commission" is debatable. It looks like the commission wants to maintain the nomenclature defaming "Off Backward Class" and withdraw the facilities. BalanceRestored 09:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

i dont feel the need to give more reference than already stated..as the calculation is quite simple..divide 250,000 by 4 for one individual..then divide by 365 to get per day per hEAD.. then divide by 40 to get the value in dollars...simple!!Cityvalyu (talk) 20:56, 12 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Any information about why the creamy layer has been put "ONLY" for OBC and not for SC/ST? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.2.252 (talk) 04:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

The article talks about "SCs" and "STs" but fails to explain what they are. Could someone please explain this? JIP | Talk 18:14, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

These unexplained appbreviations are called out with ^{[clarification needed]} tags now, and should remain so until they are clarified. Le Prof 50.179.252.14 (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

The period to which the current and interim rupee creamy layer income caps apply is not stated in the lede, but may reasonably be presumed to be per annum (per 1 year), since this appears with the 100,000 rupee original figure. However, in the main body, the 600,000 figure is stated to apply to a 3 year period. This discrepancy between main body text and lede needs to be rectified.

At the same time, the article as a whole needs to be read by a person informed on Indain matters, but familiar with Western English-speaking audiences, so any remaining ambiguities of abbreviation and nomenclature are removed. There were, before I began today, three different abbreviation of rupees (symbol, INR, and Rs), and two different presentation of numbers on the order of 100,000 (general Western style, versus Indian style). I have standardized all of these, hopefully without error, but the edits would be checked by someone with both Indian and Western understandings. Le Prof 50.179.252.14 (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Creamy layer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.business-standard.com/common/news_article.php?leftnm=3&autono=319771

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:04, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Creamy layer/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 18:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 12:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Creamy layer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120711025932/http://www.jee.iitm.ac.in:80/ to http://jee.iitm.ac.in/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have just added new link regarding creamy layer. Creamy layer can't be excluded from backward classes on sole basis of economy.Just take a look of it. Similar to that of Indra sawney case. Steel pluto (talk) 12:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply